Judicial ethics
In: The library of essays on legal ethics and the enforcement of law
802 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The library of essays on legal ethics and the enforcement of law
In: Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, Band 18
SSRN
In: Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: McGeorge Law Review, Band 42, Heft 1
SSRN
In: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 363, S. 36-43
ISSN: 0002-7162
While the ethics of the US judiciary cover a broad spectrum, both good & bad, the general overall level of judicial ethical performance is relatively high. Most judges are honest & honorable. Where dissatisfaction is apparent, it is far more frequently directed at judicial competence 'than at judicial integrity & ethics. Corruption, dishonesty, susceptibility to pol'al pressure & other ethical lapses are, however, not unknown & on very rare occasions have been extremely bad. The ethical obligations of the judiciary extend far beyond the basic essentials of honesty, impartiality, & fairness. Judges must not only avoid evil or wrongdoing, but must also avoid any appearance of suspicion of impropriety, both on the bench & in private life. Selected ethical problems are identified together with some of the areas where signif ethical lapses are to be found. While our judiciary has done well in meeting its ethical obligations, improvement is still needed. The best assurance for high ethical performance comes from insistence upon outstanding integrity from those selected for judicial office. HA.
In: 89 Fordham Law Review 1197 (2021)
SSRN
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 363, Heft 1, S. 36-43
ISSN: 1552-3349
While the ethics of the American judiciary cover a broad spectrum, both good and bad, the general over-all level of judicial ethical performance is relatively high. Most judges are honest and honorable. Where dissatisfaction is apparent, it is far more frequently directed at judicial competence than at judicial integrity and ethics. Corruption, dishonesty, sus ceptibility to political pressure, and other ethical lapses are, however, not unknown, and on very rare occasions have been extremely bad. The ethical obligations of the judiciary extend far beyond the basic essentials of honesty, impartiality, and fairness. Judges must not only avoid evil or wrongdoing, but must also avoid any appearance or suspicion of impropriety, both on the bench and in private life. Selected ethical prob lems are identified together with some of the areas where significant ethical lapses are to be found. While our judiciary has done well in meeting its ethical obligations, improvement is still needed. The best assurance for high ethical perform ance comes from insistence upon outstanding integrity from those selected for judicial office.
In: LAWYER AND JUDICIAL ETHICS: IOWA PRACTICE, Thomson-West Publishers, 2007 Edition
SSRN
In: Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Band 26
SSRN
In: New York Law Journal, October 21, 1996
SSRN