Independence of the Judiciary
In: Social scientist: monthly journal of the Indian School of Social Sciences, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 65
300 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social scientist: monthly journal of the Indian School of Social Sciences, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 65
In: The Ralph Nader Congress Project
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 60, Heft 358, S. 365-367
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee: VRÜ = World comparative law : WCL, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 335-341
ISSN: 0506-7286
In: (Da Capo Press reprints in American constitutional and legal history)
In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee: VRÜ = World comparative law : WCL, Band 9, S. 335-341
ISSN: 0506-7286
World Affairs Online
In: NBER Working Paper No. w0110
SSRN
Working paper
In: The review of politics, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 357-376
ISSN: 1748-6858
The conventional wisdom on the basic philosophy of the constitutional concept of the separation of powers is well stated in The Federalist. In No. 47, citing the authority of the "celebrated Montesquieu," James Madison wrote that "the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." Clearly the Founding Fathers feared the corrupting influence of power. As Madison asked in No. 51, "what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary." Another concise statement of the separation of powers concept is found in the famous remark made by Justice Brandeis in 1926, in his dissenting opinion in the Myers case, that "the doctrine of the separation of powers was adopted by the Convention of 1787 not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy."
In: The review of politics, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 357-376
ISSN: 0034-6705
THE CONCEPT OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS IS NOT ONLY A POLITICAL THEORY IN THE US, IT IS A RULE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW WHICH IS ULTIMATELY ENFORCEABLE IN THE COURTS. THUS NEARLY ALL SEPARATION OF POWERS ISSUES ARE DECIDED BY THE COURTS.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 74
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/wu.89096558390
"December 20, 1972." ; Cover title. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 9-10). ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: The review / International Commission of Jurists, S. 34-36
ISSN: 0020-6393
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 918-937
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 38, S. 918-937
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The Allyn and Bacon series in American government