Suchergebnisse

AbstractGoodgovernance is an ideal form ofgovernance management, governance practices influenced bymany things, one of which is quality human resources, in the bureaucracy known as civil stateapparatus. The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) is a new form of governance with respect to theavailability and empowerment of state employees. Law Number 5 Year 2014 states that civil servantcivil servants are civil servants and government employees with employment agreements, this is verycontradictory to Law Number 8 Year 1974 on the Principles of Personnel which only talk about CivilServants. In the implementation of duties and obligations of civil state apparatus is expected to beable to carry out their duties and obligations properly in order to provide good service and quality forthe community, therefore the discipline of a civil state apparatus is very influential on the quality ofpublic services and wheels of government in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to know andanalyze the forms of ASN disciplinary violations and to find out and analyze the constraints andsolutions in facing violations of ASN discipline in Indonesia. The research method used issociological juridical research method with literature study approach and documents related to ASNdiscipline.Keywords: Good Governance, State Civil Apparatus

Conflict and violence was the destructive reality that showed reduction and alienated of existence humanity. The essence of human being has destruction because dominance of egoism of people's without care value of victim community. Because of that condition, the basic need to create a culture of peace as constructive reality that connected relationship between all of people is urgently. On the level individual and group, the acceptance of "the other‐self" as him/herself has destroy the wall of differences which always be source of conflict and violence. The fusion identity "we" (ingroup) and "them" (outgroup) has establish common ingroup identity as "us" in recategorization process that contribution to reduction negative aspect seems like prejudice, discrimination and stereotype. This research involve four subject with age 20‐30 years old, genre as masculin and feminin, and they have a comprehensive science about pela tradition. Other informant like a King of negeri, Kapitan negeri and all of people also involve in this research. Qualitative method with ethno‐phenomenology approach is use in this research with observation and interview as method and procedure to collect data. The result of this research showed that culture of peace can be found in local wisdom as pela tradition. The basic idea in this tradition is a common identity "saudara/orang basudara" which has calling as "ela". Pscychological dynamics occur in this perspective because the word of "ela" to contain a constructive and positive meaning that arranged relation between the groups Rohomoni‐Tuhaha. Implementation of values the culture of peace has been seen in the behavioral "saudara pela" that mutual constructive, trust, respect. This fact could be found in Molluccas conflict at 1999‐2004, pela tradition can be the media reconciliation between two groups Moslem and Christian.

Fiscal decentralization is one of the government's strategies to improve people's welfare. The fiscal decentralization policy instrument that can directly affect the quality of local government spending is The Specific Allocation Fund (DAK). The DAK management in the financial aspect has a few problems, nonoptimal regional government performance and mismatched allocation and government needs. Proposal based The Specific Allocation Fund (DAK) hopefully could adjust the development priorities determined by regional conditions, government needs, and undeveloped villages with high-level poverty. Pandeglang and Lebak Regency are the region with the highest poverty level in Banten Province. This study aims to analyze the DAK effect of each sector on poverty in Pandeglang and Lebak Regency. The analysis used Geographical Weighted Regression (GWR) with DAK data for each field in 2018 and poverty data in 2019. The result showed that DAK variables in education, health, and agriculture tended not to reduce poverty rates. The DAK variable in the housing and settlement sector, the marine and fisheries sector, the tourism sector, and the market sector tended to reduce poverty. At the same time, the DAK variable in Road, sanitation, and village funds tended to reduce poverty levels in most districts. Based on the study, the poverty alleviation program in each district is adjusted to each of the DAK sectors that are influential. However, the result indicated that the adjustment of DAK sectors influenced the poverty alleviation program in every district in Pandeglang and Lebak Regency.

ABSTRACTSince the Act Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Election,the electoral systemin Indonesia has undergone many changes,one of the changes was seen in the authorityof Bawaslu, Bawaslu which initially only as an election supervisory institution now hasthe authority to decide violations of election administration.The formulation of theproblem in the research is;1)What is the authority of the Bawaslu of West SumatraProvince in resolving administrative violations in 2019 committed by the KPU of WestSumatra Province? 2) How is the mechanism of the Bawaslu of West Sumatra Provincein resolving administrative violations in 2019 mcommitted by the KPU of West SumatraProvince? 3) How is the adjudication session mechanism in facing election violations in2019 by the KPU of West Sumatra Province? The research method used of thisresearch is juridical and normative approach. Furthermore, from the results ofresearch and discussion of the conclution is : 1) Authority to resolve electoraladministrative violations carried out by the West Sumatra KPU as reported by FauziBahar, Amril Jiha and Syahril Hamid are the authorities of the Bawaslu of WestSumatra Province; 2) Mechanism for resolving election administration violations andthe mechanism for adjudication session is regulated in the General ElectionSupervisory Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2018 concerning the Settlement ofAdministrative Election Violations; 3) The mechanism for adjudication to is regulatedin the General Election Supervisory Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2018 concerningthe Settlement of Administrative Election Violations.