Parteiprogramm der mauretanischen Union pour la démocratie et le progrès (UDF) sowie deren Statuten. Zudem sind ein Interview des Parteivorsitzenden Hamdi Ould Mouknass mit "Jeune Afrique", eine Erklärung zum Problem der Sklavenhaltung in Mauretanien und einige Parteiresolutionen zu internationalen politischen Ereignissen abgedruckt. (DÜI-Kog)
Die Sondernummer der Zeitschrift Revue mauritaniènne de droit et d'économie ist der Tagungsband eines von der Universität Nouakchott veranstalteten Kongresses (23./24.5.1994) zum Stand der Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit in Mauretanien. Die Verfassung vom 20.7.1991 ist in arabisch abgedruckt. (DÜI-Kog)
Recension d'ouvrage: Seralini, G.-E.; Douzelet, J. L'affaire Roundup à la lumière des Monsanto Papers. Paris: Éditions Actes Sud, 2020. ; Book review: Seralini, G.-E.; Douzelet, J. L'affaire Roundup à la lumière des Monsanto Papers. Paris: Éditions Actes Sud, 2020.
Recension d'ouvrage: Seralini, G.-E.; Douzelet, J. L'affaire Roundup à la lumière des Monsanto Papers. Paris: Éditions Actes Sud, 2020. ; Book review: Seralini, G.-E.; Douzelet, J. L'affaire Roundup à la lumière des Monsanto Papers. Paris: Éditions Actes Sud, 2020.
This paper examines Pierre Rosanvallon's contribution to understanding populism by adopting two approaches: the first one is the internalist approach, comprising an analysis of his book Le Siècle du populisme (2020) and its comparison with his theory of changes in contemporary democracy (2006-2015). The second approach consists of comparing Le Siècle du populisme with the works of other authors on the subject. The paper is divided into three parts. First, we analyze Le Siècle du populisme, focusing on the two aspects that we consider the most original: the typology of "limit forms of democracy" and its ways of degradation and his critique of populism. In the second part, we contrast this work with his theory of changes in contemporary democracy. In the third part, we contextualize Rosanvallon's work within the literature on populism, exploring the author's idea of populism vis-à-vis democracy. We also compare his interpretation with three of the main contemporary works on the subject: that of Nadia Urbinati involving theory of democracy, and that of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, leading theorists of "leftist populism", targets of Rosanvallon's criticism. Then, we argue that what distinguishes his contribution to populism research is the scope of his theory, able to encompass tensions and complexities in the study of democracy and that offers a way out of the theoretical ambiguities of previous studies on populism. ; L'objectif de cet article est d'examiner la contribution de Pierre Rosanvallon à la compréhension du populisme. Pour ce faire, nous adoptons deux approches : la première, internaliste, consiste à analyser Le Siècle du populisme et l'articuler à sa théorie des mutations de la démocratie contemporaine (2006-2015) ; la seconde consiste à confronter ce même livre avec des œuvres d'autres auteurs sur le sujet. Dans une première partie, nous analysons Le Siècle du populisme en privilégiant les deux aspects qui nous semblent les plus originaux : la typologie des « démocraties limites », ses formes de ...
Analisamos nesse artigo, as implicações e os limites da proposta para o desenvolvimento do Brasil nos anos 90 do século XX. À luz da perspectiva ontológica marxiana, nos detivemos na reflexão das políticas educacionais do governo brasileiro, e em alguns projetos desenvolvidos pelas Nações Unidas. Esses corpos legais apontam saídas para o desenvolvimento econômico e social do Brasil, através de um outro modelo de formação escolar. Confrontamos o modelo de desenvolvimento defendido pelos objetos em análise com a compreensão crítica e particular da formação histórica do Brasil. Dessa forma, concluímos que há incongruências nesse projeto, pois sua proposta não supera o lugar subordinado do Brasil frente aos países avançados do capital.
The machine-man of La Mettrie appears constantly connected to the cartesian animal-machine. From this relation, it is possible to inquire whether there is indeed some continuity between the Cartesian proposal and that advocated by La Mettrie or, on the contrary, whether the latter effectively represents a criticism and a rupture with respect to the former. Our interpretation is that the germ of materialism - and La Mettrie does not escape it - can only develop in the condition of breaking completely with the cartesian doctrine. So, far from there being only one step between one and another philosophical theory, what exists is a radical and giant difference. There is no theoretical continuity between the cartesian animal-machine and the lamettrian machine-man. Unlike what happens in Descartes theory, particularly, in his dualistic conception that implies a discontinuity, Machine-man establishes a continuist thesis between men and animals. For La Mettrie, the passage from animality to humanity is not a violent passage, but a gradual one.
