Suchergebnisse

The discussion of the role of self-government in Poland's political structure has been closely linked to the Polish people's aspirations and desire for freedom, democracy and a state in which sovereignty is indeed in the hands of its people. These aspirations, so strongly expressed during the general election of June 1989, have since the very beginning included demands for self-government. What it meant for the state and its political system, was the implementation of the idea embodied in the name Solidarity which, as a trade union, was also to be independent and self-governing. It was also the realisation of the demand for a 'Samorządna Rzeczpospolita' (a Self-governing Republic), one of the fundamental principles of the Solidarity movement put forward at its First National Congress, which I had the honour of chairing in 1981.In March 1990, only a few months after its election on 4 June 1989, the Polish parliament adopted a law that restored the institution of local self-government at the level of communes and municipalities (gmina). Thus, 25 years ago, the road to political transformation in Poland was opened, allowing the building of a Polish state understood as the political community of all its citizens – a real Res Publica.The predominating belief which accompanied us in this process was that the indispensable prerequisite to shaping democracy was to give back the state to its citizens, thus releasing dormant social energy and the entrepreneurial spirit of the people. After all democracy means not only the possibility of the democratically electing the political representatives (the authorities) but equally the chance for citizens to feel involved and take the responsibility for public affairs.Therefore the first democratic government, headed by Tadeusz Mazowiecki, began the process of restoring the state to its citizens from the most important starting point. It started with the rebuilding of communal and municipal self-governing structures and the recreating of the intellectual foundations for the formation of the new constitution of a citizens-centred state.This was possible mainly because a vision of reform had already been conceived and had been long developing in the minds of a number of distinguished persons. This project of self-government reform constituted an original example of engagement of Polish intellectuals in state affairs and their taking responsibility for the common good.The reform also turned out to be one of the most effective methods of de-communisation of Polish public life. This could be best seen in the results of the first election to self-governing structures in 1990, and the role which the Solidarity citizens' committees played in it. It was indeed the same people, the co-founders and members of the Solidarity movement, who have successfully carried out the restoration of self-government in Poland.'We marched for power to return it to the people' was the motto of the Polish government in 1997, a government which I had the honour of heading for the subsequent four years, and which articulated the goals and the sense of political and social transformation of those times. We called it a Four Reform Programme, and its objective was a fundamental transformation of public life in Poland. On the one hand we intended to create favourable conditions for the development of the public civic space, while on the other we strove to activate and make more dynamic the processes of economic, political and cultural development in the country.We believed that acceleration of this development and modernisation was contingent upon active participation of self-government structures. Hence the creation of strong self-government had gradually become our conscious choice and an urgent 'civilising task.' This task was grounded equally in the need to manage properly our recently regained independence, and in the need to make efficient use of the pre-accession period preceding Poland's membership of the European Union, which was then imminent.Thus the administrative reform undertaken by my government in 1999 introduced districts (powiat) as self-governing level of administration, allowing it, in conjunction with communes and municipalities (gmina), to take effective control of matters directly affecting local communities and their citizens. The self-governing structures formed at the level of strong voivodships, or regions, allowed at the same time to decentralise responsibility for regional economic development, competitiveness and modernisation strategies.Today, after over 10 years of EU membership, it is worth reflecting on the impact the political reforms which we carried through then have had on Poland's functioning in the system of European integration. We were proven right in our conviction that decentralisation and differentiation of various state functions would allow for a better and more effective use and management of EU funds.The three-tier self-government structure created solid foundations helping to satisfy better the aspirations of citizens, local communities and regions with regard to their modernisation and development. Today it is those local self-governing units, those closest to citizens, those most familiar with and with the best understanding of their needs, which are responsible for the drafting of regional development projects and the management of funds available for those projects. Self-government structures have become the real centres for formulating and implementing development strategies.This is the context in which the key challenge facing self-government is set, namely the fostering of entrepreneurship, ensuring proper conditions for innovation and mobilising citizens to engage in economic and social initiatives. The role of self-government in shaping of the state's development policy is not limited to dividing available means and resources. Much more important is its ability to effectively multiply the available means, to support partnership ventures, including public-private projects, to form strong business to business relationships as well as partner relations between research centres and local administrative bodies, or promote and support innovations and civic initiatives serving the common good. After all, all these are key factors for the long-term stability and development of our communities and our country, which is today the key measure of the responsibility for public matters, so deeply rooted in the idea of self-government.The self-government reform originated from the ideas developed in the 1980s of the twentieth century as part of the Solidarity movement, but was implemented in an already independent Poland, when laying the foundations for a transformation of the state and the democratisation of the citizen-state relationship. It also had, however, and maybe predominantly, a deep idealistic dimension, so easy to forget when we focus on the current and most urgent challenges of the present.In my opinion, it is in self-governance, as well as in the political and administrative culture, that opportunities for building our freedom lie: freedom, the sense of which we feel best if given a chance to share in the responsibility for it. In times of independence this means the possibility of personal engagement public issues based on the pro publico bono principle: issues pertaining to our family life, our local community, or the whole country.Today, in the context of our shared responsibility for the European Union, such an understanding of self-governance should also inspire us to seek new directions of development, and to participate in the shaping of Europe-wide standards of public life. In the same way as 25 years ago in Poland we founded a political community on the basis of self-governance, we should today look at self-governance as a chance to create a true political community of all European citizens.

The book contains a thorough analysis of the European Union institutional system as a specific, sui generis international organisation, in the context of its legitimization (its validity and legitimacy). The book is mainly theoretical. Primarily, the author aims at presenting a reliable depiction of the EU institutional system legitimization through the prism of the theoretical output concerning legitimization of the political power, including and accentuating the indicated specificity of the EU as a distinct international organisation. Secondly, he took into consideration the changes introduced into the legal foundations of the EU functioning, pursuant to the Lisbon Treaty – the latest treaty reforming the structures of the Union. In the context of the main theme of the present study, these changes are important not only in terms of the EU institutions themselves, i.e. their competences and reciprocal relations, but also with regard to the fundamental change of the legal character of the EU, and the alterations introduced into the individual Union politics. Thirdly, the author attempts to present the problem of the EU institutional system legitimization in the special circumstances, i.e. in the situation of the most profound economic crisis that the EU members have faced since the beginning of the integration process. The EU is regarded as a specific structure, being neither a state nor a typical international organisation. Such an approach was the starting point for the main premise of the present book – the idea that the thesis about the deficiency of democracy in the EU, formulated in the literature on the subject and in the public debate, is a certain simplification, and the characteristic features of the EU and its institutions, which provoked the formulation of such a thesis, should be considered in a broader context, such as the problem of the EU institutional system legitimization and, alternatively, the deficiency of that legitimization. For the direct democratic legitimization is only one of many sources of legitimacy of the EU institutional system and of the Union as a specific international organisation in general – an extremely important source, perhaps the most important, yet not the only one. Thus, the legitimization of the EU and its institutions should be analysed in a broader perspective, which also includes other sources of legitimization – as it is done in case of every political power which, striving for its legitimization to be as strong as possible, attempts to derive it from the largest number of sources. According to the author of the book, to base the EU institutional system legitimization only on the grounds of the direct democratic legitimization characteristic of a democratic state, would be tantamount to a certain disruption of the right order. It would rather be a symptom of too advanced an integration on the "institutional" level in comparison to the extent of the "material" integration. Until the EU is a structure sui generis, in which case it is a combination of features characteristic of an intergovernmental, international organisation, a supranational organisation or a state, the nature of legitimization of this structure should also be specific. The most important role should be played by the democratic legitimization, which should be completed with other sources, owing to which the functioning of the EU institutional system, and the whole EU, could be recognised as legally valid. Apart from the main thesis also other theses and hypotheses are posed in the book. The first chapter is a certain theoretical introduction and a basis to the deliberations presented in the further parts of this study. In the first subsection, with reference to the literature on the subject, the problem of legitimization (legitimacy) of the political power, i.e. the concept, classifications and sources of legitimization (legitimacy) of the political power, have been synthetically depicted. In another part of chapter one, the author attempts to relate the problem of legitimization to the EU as a specific international organisation and to formulate his own definition of legitimization deficiency with regard to EU institutional system. Bearing in mind that the problem of legitimization deficiency in the EU (EC) has not been discussed on a larger scale until certain stage of development of integration process was reached, in 1.3. subsection, the author raises some questions concerning: the sufficiency of legitimization of the integration process during the first few decades after the Second World War, the grounds for that legitimization and the reasons why, at a certain stage of the EU (EC) development the legitimization of the Union's institutional system started to be considered insufficient, which was manifested in the opinions acknowledging the democracy and legitimization deficiency. The first chapter ends with a passage devoted to the importance of the EU institutional system legitimization, whereas the significance of legitimization to the political power and political institutions in general, consitutes its reference point. The second chapter (subsections 2.3.–2.8.) presents a synthesis of the evolution of the EU (EC) institutional system in the context of its legitimization, from the moment of the EC founding treaties ratification, till the time the changes pursuant to the Lisbon Treaty were introduced. The author focused here mainly on the competences of the particular EC (EU) institutions and their reciprocal relations, which should make it possible to observe two main tendencies in the dynamics of changes taking place in this field, and present its specificity and distinctiveness in comparison to the systems of democratic states. At the beginning of this chapter, a thesis has been formulated (simultaneously, becoming an extension of the attempt to determine why, at a certain stage of the integration process, the issue of democracy/legitimization deficiency started to be discussed – a question that was raised in the first chapter), which states that the legitimization of the EU institutional system will be sufficient, if the law regulations and political practice of their functioning are convergent with the level of advancement of the integration process in various spheres of social life; in other words, the "institutional" integration should correspond with the "material" integration (that is the Union politics). To that end, the author made an attempt to present, in a synthetized form, the development of the "material" integration (subsection 2.1.), which he completed with an analogical endeavour to illustrate the evolution of the EU (EC) institutional system in the context of its legitimization (subsection 2.9). For in accordance with the increasingly common approach, the EU institutions are treated as a system, the concept and principles of which have been presented in 2.2. subsection. In the third chapter, the author presents the EU institutional system in its current form, that is with the changes introduced under the Lisbon Treaty. Here, the selected aspects regarding competences and functioning of the particular EU institutions have been depicted, as well as the relations between them in the context of legitimization. Additionally, three selected problems regarding the EU institutional system have been raised, which are especially important in the context of its legitimization (the relation between the EU institutional system and the institutions of the EU member states, the question of transparency in the functioning of the EU institutions, as well as the Union budgets in the consecutive years). In the last subsection (3.9.) the specific features of the EU institutional system, significant in the context of its legitimization, have been identified. The fourth chapter is devoted to the functioning of the EU institutional system in the perspective of four basic sources of its legitimization, i.e. indirect and technocratic, direct and democratic, utilitarian, and one consisting of "values". The chapter ends with a conclusion outlining the specificity of the EU and its institutional system with regard to the sources of its legitimization, which is especially important in the context of the book's main thesis. The fifth chapter concerns the problem of legitimization of the EU institutions in the context of the economic crisis, which the EU member states struggle with since around the year 2008. The sixth chapter, in turn, regards the so called subjective (empirical, social) dimension of the EU institutions' legitimization, that is, the way this problem is perceived by the citizens of the EU member states. It has been based on the results of opinion polls conducted for the use of Eurobarometer, from among which these questions and answers were selected, which could be applied to illustrate the way the EU citizens perceive the Union institutions in the context of their legitimization. The closing remarks include the most important conclusions drawn from the conducted analyses and the potential reforms and modifications of the EU institutional system, which may allow for the reinforcement of its legitimization, primarily in its democratic aspect. The bibliography contains a list of sources which were cited and referred to in the book.

Tom Cyberbezpieczeństwo wyzwaniem XXI wieku jest opracowaniem, które wpisuje się w kontekst rozważań poświęconych wielorakim aspektom bezpieczeństwa w cyberprzestrzeni. Autorzy, którzy zostali zaproszeni do realizacji tego projektu, prezentują różne spojrzenia na tę problematykę. Pomysłodawcą pierwszego rozdziału – Główni aktorzy cyberprzestrzeni i ich działalność jest Tomasz Hoffman. Autor, piszący z perspektywy prawno-politologicznej, posiłkujący się dorobkiem nauk o bezpieczeństwie, koncentruje się na ukazaniu potencjalnych aktorów cyberprzestrzeni, ich działalności, a w tym również zachowań niezgodnych z prawem. Cyberbezpieczeństwo, zdaniem Hoffmana, jest nową dziedziną bezpieczeństwa narodowego, z którą nieodłącznie wiążą się takie wyzwania, jak cyberprzestępczość oraz cyberterroryzm. Drugi rozdział – Cyberbezpieczeństwo jako wyzwanie dla współczesnego państwa i społeczeństwa – wyszedł spod pióra Marka Górki. Badacz dokonał przeglądu aktualnego stanu bezpieczeństwa cybernetycznego w kontekście rozprzestrzeniania się zagrożeń pochodzących z cyberprzestrzeni, tworzonych przez organizacje państwowe oraz niepaństwowe. Górka stoi na stanowisku, że cyberprzestrzeń stała się podstawową cechą świata i stworzyła nową rzeczywistość dla prawie wszystkich krajów, co sprawia, że problemy z cyberprzestępczością oraz cyberbezpieczeństwem mają istotne, globalne znaczenie zarówno w wymiarze politycznym, jak i gospodarczym. Z przemyśleniami Górki koresponduje tekst Bogusława Węglińskiego – Cyberterroryści w cyfrowych czasach – profesjonalizacja i digitalizacja współczesnych organizacji terrorystycznych. Autor poddał analizie ewoluujące wraz z rozwojem technologii instrumentarium wykorzystywane przez grupy terrorystyczne, zwracając uwagę na Internet, który otworzył przed nimi nowe możliwości oddziaływania, a w tym także w sferze kreowania przekazu medialnego. W tekście zawarte są również dociekania dotyczące możliwości użycia przez terrorystów dronów. Nadmieńmy, że także czwarty rozdział Ataki cyberfizyczne a system bezpieczeństwa narodowego, którego autorem jest Bogusław Olszewski, wpisuje się w nurt wcześniejszych dociekań. W tej części tomu poruszone zostały sprawy związane z niepożądanym oddziaływaniem systemów cyberfizycznych na bezpieczeństwo otoczenia międzynarodowego. Zdaniem Olszewskiego, ich hybrydowy (cyfrowo-materialny) charakter sprawia, że wpływają nie tylko na logiczną warstwę cyberprzestrzeni, ale także na dziedzinę fizyczną. Umożliwiają m.in. destabilizację porządku wewnętrznego państwa, co w konsekwencji może prowadzić do destrukcyjnych zmian w szerszym, międzynarodowym kontekście. Stanowią zatem wielowymiarowe zagrożenie dla szeroko pojętego systemu bezpieczeństwa globalnego W rozdziale piątym, Marcin Adamczyk przedłożył tekst Cyberszpiegostwo w relacjach chińsko-amerykańskich w kontekście potencjalnej zmiany światowego hegemona. Opracowanie poświęcone jest działaniom Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej w cyberprzestrzeni, ukierunkowanych na nielegalne pozyskanie amerykańskich technologii wojskowych i cywilnych. Zdaniem autora, Państwo Środka jest aktualnie jedynym krajem, który obecnie mógłby rzucić wyzwanie dominacji Stanów Zjednoczonych. Dążenie do uzyskania statusu państwa hegemonicznego wymaga zatem od Pekinu zbudowania odpowiedniej koalicji wspierającej Chiny na arenie międzynarodowej, ale również zmniejszenia dystansu ekonomicznego, jaki dzieli to państwo od Waszyngtonu. Autorem kolejnego rozdziału jest Kamil Baraniuk, którzy przygotował tekst Zarys przemian instytucjonalnych rosyjskiego wywiadu radioelektronicznego. Baraniuk podkreśla, że współczesny wysoki stopień zinformatyzowania społeczeństw i powszechności korzystania z technologii informatycznych sprawia, iż dane o charakterze sygnałowym i elektromagnetycznym stanowią bardzo istotne źródło informacji dla wyspecjalizowanych instytucji, zajmujących się ich gromadzeniem oraz przetwarzaniem. W tym kontekście zarysowuje genezę i przekształcenia instytucjonalne wywiadu radioelektronicznego Federacji Rosyjskiej, a co za tym idzie wojskowe i cywilne instytucje zajmujące się tego rodzaju działalnością na przestrzeni ostatnich kilkudziesięciu lat, przy uwzględnieniu ich zadań, a także zmian personalnych w ich kierownictwie. Rozdział siódmy napisany został przez dwie autorki z Ukrainy. Tetiana W. Nagachevskaya i Lyudmila Frliksowa przygotowały rozważania zatytułowane Napriamky formuwannia miżnarodnoji konkurentospromożnosti IT-sektoru Ukrajiny. Zawierają one analizę stanu i osobliwości kształtowania się międzynarodowej konkurencyjności sektora IT na Ukrainie. Nagachevskaya i Frliksowa zaprezentowały pozycję ukraińskiego sektora IT rozpatrywaną w kontekście Networked Readiness Index, który mierzy skłonność do wykorzystywania przez kraje możliwości oferowanych przez technologie informacyjno-komunikacyjne. Ponadto, ukazały przewagę konkurencyjną i wady ukraińskich firm IT na rynkach międzynarodowych oraz kierunki wzrostu międzynarodowej konkurencyjności sektora informatycznego Ukrainy. Kolejne dwa rozdziały dotykają problematyki religijnej w cyberprzestrzeni. Autorem dociekań – Religijne i parareligijne grupy destrukcyjne: wyzwania cyberprzestrzeni – jest Wojciech Gajewski, który zwraca uwagę na sprawę penetrowania wirtualnej przestrzeni przez destrukcyjne grupy religijne. Jego zdaniem, stanowią one wzrastające zagrożenie nie tylko dla jej indywidualnych użytkowników, ale także zbiorowości społecznych. Religioznawca jest zwolennikiem podejmowania szeroko zakrojonych działań badawczych, edukacyjnych, a także prawnych, które wpłyną na ograniczenie negatywnych następstw ich aktywności w cyberprzestrzeni. Z kolei, Lucjan Klimsza przedłożył tekst Filozoficzne aspekty działania Internetu w kontekście zadań misyjnych Kościoła. Autor, który jest duchownym ewangelickim, zwraca uwagę na możliwości, jakie otwiera przed współczesnym chrześcijaństwem dostęp do przestrzeni cyfrowej. Klimsza wyraźnie zaznacza, że obecny Kościół musi być wspólnotą multimedialną, jednakże nie wirtualną, która jest oddalona od człowieka i jego realnej egzystencji. Autor, Internet postrzega zatem jako metamedium umożliwiające przekazywanie treści religijnych, które może być pomocne m.in. w spotkaniu i relacjach człowieka z człowiekiem oraz Boga z człowiekiem. Dziesiąty rozdziały Cyberbezpieczeństwo jako konstrukt w polskiej przestrzeni publicznej, będący rozważaniami o nachyleniu politologicznym, napisał Przemysław Mikiewicz. Tekst jest refleksją nad obecnością kategorii cyberbezpieczeństwa w polskiej przestrzeni publicznej, którą autor zawęził do opiniotwórczego oddziaływania centralnych instytucji państwowych oraz partii politycznych. Autor wskazuje, że pojęcie cyberbezpieczeństwa jest obecne w polskiej przestrzeni publicznej w różnym stopniu w dokumentach rządowych i w programach partii politycznych. Zdaniem Mikiewicza, występuje zasadnicza asymetria pomiędzy oboma typami dokumentów: dokumenty urzędowe poświęcają uwagę cyberbezpieczeństwu w znacznym stopniu, podczas gdy w dokumentach partyjnych kwestia ta jest jedynie wzmiankowana. Tak więc, cyberbezpieczeństwo jawi się jako rodzaj konstruktu, za pomocą którego kreowany jest obraz świata pełnego nienamacalnych niebezpieczeństw, do zwalczania których nieodzowne wydaje się publikowanie dokumentów pod postacią kolejnych doktryn i strategii walki z zagrożeniami w cyberprzrestrzeni. W nurt rozważań politologicznych wpisują się także dwa kolejne teksty. Autorem pierwszego jest Grzegorz Tokarz, którego dociekania zostały zatytułowane Internet jako instrument nawoływania do przemocy – przykład organizacji "Krew i Honor" Polska. Tekst przybliża działalność polskiej sekcji neonazistowskiej organizacji "Krew i Honor", a w tym zawartość jej strony internetowej, która jest istotnym narzędziem w propagowaniu idei tego środowiska, jak również źródłem informacji o osobach oraz instytucji uznawanych za zdrajców "białej rasy". Drugi tekst, który zarazem kończy niniejszy tom przygotował Mariusz Kozerski. W rozdziale Dawne afery polityczne ze współczesnej perspektywy: przykład sprawy Barschela/Pffeifera analizowana jest rola, jaką media odgrywają w nagłaśnianiu afer politycznych. Autor poddał oglądowi wydarzenia, które rozegrały się w latach 80 XX wieku, w północnoniemieckim landzie Szlezwik-Holsztyn, a w których ważną rolę odegrał opiniotwórczy tygodnik "Der Spiegel". Dodajmy, że Kozerski podejmuje się również próby odpowiedzi na pytanie, w jaki sposób afera kilońska mogłaby przebiegać współcześnie, w kontekście potencjału informacyjnego/opiniotwórczego, którym charakteryzuje się globalna sieć komputerowa. ; "Cybersecurity as the challenge of the XXI century" is a collection of considerations dedicated to various aspects of security in cyberspace. Authors, who have been invited to this project, present different views on this subject. An author of the first chapter, "The main actors of cyberspace and their activities", is Tomasz Hoffman. Writing from a legal and political perspective, including the achievements of security sciences, he tries to present potential actors of cyberspace, and their activities, including behaviors against the law. Cybersecurity, according to Hoffman, is a new element of national security and is related to challenges, such as cybercrime and cyberterrorism. The second chapter, "Cybersecurity as a challenge for modern countries and societies", has been written by Marek Górka. The researcher has reviewed the current situation of the cybersecurity in the context of the spread of dangers in cyberspace, created by government and non-government organizations. Górka states that cyberspace has become a basic feature of the world and has created a new reality for almost all countries, what caused that the problems with cybercrime and cybersecurity became significant in both, the political and the economic aspect. A text, which corresponds to the Górka's thoughts, is the text "Cyberterrorists in digital times - professionalization and digitalization of modern terrorist organizations" by Bogusław Węgliński. The author has analyzed the instruments used by terrorist groups. The instruments which have been evolving along with the development of technology. The most important of them is the Internet, which has opened new opportunities for terrorists, including digital communicating. The text also includes aspects of the usage of drones by terrorists. The fourth chapter, "Cyber-physical attacks and the national security system", by Bogusław Olszewski, is also related to the previously mentioned issues. This part of the book deals with matters of the undesirable impact of cyber-physical systems on the safety of the international environment. According to Olszewski, their hybrid (digital-material) character causes that they affect not only the logical aspect of cyberspace but also the physical one. They enable destabilization of the internal structure of countries, what can lead to destructive changes in the wider, international context. They are a multifaceted danger to the broadly understood system of the global security. In the fifth chapter, Marcin Adamczyk has presented a text titled "Cyberspying in Chinese-American relations, in the context of the potential change of the world hegemon". The study is dedicated to the activities of the People's Republic of China in cyberspace, taken to acquire American military and civil technologies. The author claims that China is currently the only country that could challenge the global domination of the United States. However, to obtain the status of the hegemonic state, Beijing would need to build a solid coalition, supporting China on the international arena, but also reduce the economic distance between Beijing and Washington. An author of the next chapter is Kamil Baraniuk, who has prepared a text titled "Outline of the institutional changes in the Russian radio-electronic intelligence". Baraniuk emphasizes that the high level of computerization of societies and the common use of information technologies makes the signal and electromagnetic data a very important source of information for specialized institutions dealing with information collection and processing. In this context the author outlines the genesis and the institutional transformation of the Russian radio-electronic intelligence, as well as the military and civil institutions dealing with this kind of activities over the last decades, analyzing their tasks and personnel changes in their management. The seventh chapter has been written by two authors from Ukraine. Tetiana W. Nagachevskaya and Lyudmila Frliksowa prepared a text "Napryamky formuvannya mizhnarodnoyi konkurentospromozhnosti IT-sector Ukrayiny". This text contains an analysis of the current situation and peculiarities in the shaping of the international competitiveness of the IT sector in Ukraine. Nagachevskaya and Frliksowa have presented the position of the Ukrainian IT sector, considered in the context of the Networked Readiness Index, which measures the tendency of different countries to use the opportunities offered by informational and communicational technology. In addition, they have shown competitive advantages and disadvantages of Ukrainian IT companies on international markets, and directions of growth of the international competitiveness of the IT sector in Ukraine. Next two chapters have been related to religious issues in cyberspace. "Religious and pseudoreligious destructive groups: the challenges of cyberspace" has been written by Wojciech Gajewski, who pays attention to the matter of penetrating of the virtual space by various destructive religious groups. In his opinion, they become increasing dangers not only for individual users of the cyberspace but also for entire social groups. The religious scholar is a supporter of extensive research, educational and even legal activities, that suppose to reduce the negative consequences of the sectarian activity in cyberspace. Next author, Lucjan Klimsza, has presented a text "Philosophical aspects of the Internet in the context of missionary tasks of the Church". Klimsza, who is a Protestant pastor, pays attention to the possibilities that the access to the digital space opens to contemporary Christianity. He clearly states that the current Church must be a multimedia, but not a virtual community, distant from a man and his real existence. The author sees the Internet as a meta-medium enabling the transmission of religious content, which may be helpful in cognition and relationship between man and God, as well as between man and man. Tenth chapter, "Cybersecurity as a construct in the Polish public space", has been written by Przemysław Mikiewicz from a political perspective. The text is a reflection of the presence of the cybersecurity in Polish public space, which has been specified by the author as the opinion-making influence of the central government institutions and political parties. The author indicates that the concept of the cybersecurity is present in the Polish public space in government documents and programs of political parties. According to Mikiewicz, there is a fundamental asymmetry between these two types: government documents pay a lot of attention to cybersecurity, programs of political parties, however, only mention about the issue. Finally, cybersecurity appears as a kind of a construct used to create an image of the modern world, full of immaterial dangers, which might be eliminated only by publication of new doctrines and strategies, created to combat dangers in cyberspace. The political aspect of the cybersecurity issue is present also in the next two texts. An author of the first one is Grzegorz Tokarz, whose section has been titled "The Internet as an instrument to incite violence - an example of Poland". The text introduces activities of the Polish section of this neo- Nazi organization, including the content of its website, which is an important tool, used to promote the ideas of this environment, as well as a source of information about people and institutions considered to be the traitors of the "white race". The second text, which also ends this book, has been prepared by Mariusz Kozerski. In this chapter, titled "Former political scandals from a modern perspective: an example of the Barschel/Pffeifer case", the analyzed issue is the role played by media to publicize political scandals. The author has reviewed incidents that took place in the 1980s, in the German land of Schleswig-Holstein. A significant role in those happenings was played by "Der Spiegel", an opinion-forming weekly magazine. Let's add that Kozerski also tries to answer the question of how that, socalled "Kiel scandal" could look like if it happened today, in the context of the contemporary informational/opinion-forming potential, which characterizes the global computer network.

W artykule przyglądam się temu, jaką edukację polityczną warto rozwijać we współczesnej polskiej szkole i wszędzie tam, gdzie buduje się w ludziach zdolność do wspólnej i niewyalienowanej pracy. Kierunek rozważań wyznaczyła konieczność ustosunkowania się myśli pedagogicznej – i równoległego dostosowania praktyk wychowawczych – do zmian w sposobie koordynacji społeczeństwa, które dokonują się w atmosferze groźby wybuchu wojny. Rozważania te buduję na dotychczasowych badaniach własnych z obszaru uczenia się w ruchach społecznych, analizując trzy porządki zapewniające koordynację społeczeństw (neoliberalizm, nacjonalizm, militaryzm) w kontekście wykluczanych przez nie wartości: dobra wspólnego, samorządu i pokoju. Rezultatem pracy jest matryca przyporządkowująca te kontrwartości różnym typom współpracy (koordynacji, kooperacji i kolaboracji). Matryca pozwala identyfikować specyfikę konkretnych przykładów mobilizacji społecznej, jak i rozpoznawać luki w kształceniu kolektywnych umiejętności współdziałania. Rezultaty analizy pozwalają zoperacjonalizować praktyki oporu pod kątem celów wychowania i stawiają w nowym świetle problemy powiązań i nawarstwiania się wrogich szkole ideologii neoliberalizmu, nacjonalizmu i militaryzmu. ; The paper analyses types of political education worth developing in contemporary Polish schools and in other places dedicated to building human capacity to work together in a non-alienated way. The analysis is based on my own research from the area of learning in social movements. I analyze three orders ensuring social coordination (neoliberalism, nationalism, and militarism) in the context of the values they exclude: the common good, self-government and peace. The result of the work is a matrix assigning these counter-values, accordingly, to coordination, cooperation and collaboration. The matrix allows for identification of the specificity of some examples of social mobilization, as well as identification of gaps in teaching collective interaction skills. The results of the analysis can be used to operationalize the practices of resistance in terms of educational goals. They also put in a new light the problems of connections between and building up of ideologies hostile to schools, that is, neoliberalism, nationalism and militarism. ; satkow@gmail.com ; Uniwersytet Gdański ; Amici, F., & Bietti, L.M. (2015). Coordination , collaboration and cooperation. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Interaction Studies, 16 (3), 7–12. ; Armingeon, K., & Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53 (3), 423–442. ; Bajaj, M. (2014). Pedagogies of resistance and critical peace education praxis. Journal of Peace Education, 12 (2), 154–166. ; Bieler, A., & Jordan, J. (2017). Commodification and 'the commons': The politics of privatising public water in Greece and Portugal during the Eurozone crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (4), 934–957. ; Bocharova, O., & Giza, T. (2015). Ludzie w sytuacji granicznej – cazus Donbasu. Między niebem a ziemią. W: Сzłowiek w sytuacji granicznej. Filizoficzne, kulturowe i historyczne wymiary refleksji i jej implikacje pedagogiczne (s. 234–248). Radom: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Technologii Eksploatacji. ; Bohle, D. (2018). European Integration, Capitalist Diversity and Crisis Trajectories on Europe's Eastern Periphery. New Political Economy, 23 (2), 239–253. ; Braathen, E. (2000). New Social Corporatism: A Discursive-Critical Review of the WDR 2000/1, 'Attacking Poverty'. Forum for Development Studies, 27 (2), 331–350. ; Brantmeier, E.J. (2007). Connecting Inner and Outer Peace: Buddhist Meditation Integrated with Peace Education. In Factis Pax, 1 (2), 120–157. ; Brzechczyn, K. (2013). O ewolucji solidarnościowej myśli społeczno-politycznej w latach 1980–1981. Studium z filozofii społecznej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. ; Cabada, L., & Tomšič, M. (2016). The Rise of Person-Based Politics in the New Democracies: The Czech Republic and Slovenia. Politics in Central Europe, 12 (2), 29–50. ; Callan, E. (1997). Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ; Christiano, T. (1990). Freedom, Consensus, and Equality in Collective Decision Making. Ethics, 101 (1), 151–181. ; Clark, P. (2007). Hybridity, holism, and "traditional" justice: the case of the gacaca courts in post-genocide Rwanda. The George Washington International Law Review, 39 (4), 765–838. ; Diani, M. (2009). The structural bases of protest events: Multiple memberships and civil society networks in the 15 February 2003 anti-war demonstrations. Acta Sociologica, 52 (1), 63–83. ; Eisenstein, C. (2011). Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, & Society in the Age of Transition. Berkeley: Evolver Editions. ; Ertesvåg, S.K. (2014). Teachers' collaborative activity in school-wide interventions. Social Psychology of Education, 17 (4), 565–588. ; Fegley, R. (2008). Comparative Perspectives on the Rehabilitation of Ex-Slaves and Former Child Soldiers with Special Reference to Sudan. African Studies Quarterly, 10 (1), 35–69. ; Ferrelli, A. (2016). Military Use of Educational Facilities during Armed Conflict: An Evaluation of the Guidelines for Protecting Schools and Universities from Military Use during Armed Conflict as an Effective Solution. Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 44 (2), 339–367. ; Foreman, E., Perry, C., & Wheeler, A. (2015). Higher Education Scholarships: A review of their impact on workplace retention and career progression. Open Review of Educational Research, 2 (1), 155–166. ; Fotaki, M., Kenny, K., & Scriver, S. (2015). Whistleblowing and Mental Health: A New Weapon for Retaliation? W: D. Lewis & W. Vandekerckhove (eds), Developments in Whistleblowing Research (s. 106–121). International Whistleblowing Research Network Under. ; Gerdes, F. (2006). Forced Migration and Armed Conflict. An Analytical Framework and a Case Study of Refugee-Warriors in Guinea. ; Giroux, H.A. (2017). War Culture and the Politics of Violence. Symploke, 25 (1–2), 191–218. ; Glăveanu, V.P., & Laurent, C.D. Saint. (2015). Political Imagination, Otherness and the European Crisis. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11 (4), 557–564. ; Góralczyk, B. (2017). Powrót Historii, czyli rewolucja antyliberalna. Studia Europejskie, 1, 9–32. ; Gower, A.L., Cusin, M., & Borowsky, I.W. (2017). A Multilevel, Statewide Investigation of School District Anti-Bullying Policy Quality. Journal of Chool Health, 87 (3), 174–181. ; Greybush, N.J. (2011). Privatizing Iceland's Geothermal Energy Sector: A Critical Analysis. Retrieved from http://martindale.cc.lehigh.edu/sites/martindale.cc.lehigh.edu/files/Private-Geother.pdf ; Harris, I. (2004). Peace education theory. Journal of Peace Education, 1 (1), 5–20. ; Head, G. (2003). Effective collaboration: Deep collaboration as an essential element of the learning process. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4 (2), 47–62. ; Ignatowicz, A. (2009). Tajna oświata i wychowanie w okupowanej Warszawie: Warszawskie Termopile 1939–1945. Warszawa: Fundacja "Warszawa Walczy 1939–1945". ; Jabłecka, J. (1993). Niezależność, autonomia i wolność akademicka a modele koordynacji szkolnictwa wyższego. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 1, 58–77. ; Janicka, I. (2016). Are These Bubbles Anarchist? Peter Sloterdisjk's Spherology and the Question of Anarchism. Anarchist Studies, 24 (1), 62–84. ; Kawula, S. (1980). Wychowanie dla pokoju i w warunkach pokoju.pdf. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej w Bydgoszczy, Studia Pedagogiczne, 6, 99–107. ; Kołodko, G. (2017). Jak zniszczyć kraj. Ekonomia i polityka greckiego kryzysu. Ekonomista, 2, 204–224. ; Kotarbiński, T. (1975). Traktat o dobrej robocie. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. ; Kowzan, P. (2012). Pierwszych pięć tysięcy lat długu Davida Graebera. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 5, 255–266. ; Kowzan, P. (2015). Kooperacja, koordynacja i kolaboracja. O trudnych relacjach międzyludzkich w ruchach społecznych wokół edukacji. W: Kooperatyzm jako czynnik formowania inteligencji w Polsce. Warszawa, Gdańsk. ; Kowzan, P. (2016). Światopogląd Grundtviga w świetle polskich tłumaczeń jego pism – implikacje dla ruchu uniwersytetów ludowych. W: T. Maliszewski (red.), Uniwersytety ludowe – pomiędzy starymi a nowymi wyzwaniami (s. 167–190). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. ; Kowzan, P. (2017). Monografia długu jako urządzenia wychowawczego [The Monograph of Debt as an Educationl Dispositif]. University of Gdańsk. ; Kowzan, P., & Krzymiński, D. (2012). Pomiędzy alienacją a emancypacją: rola rad doktoranckich w ustalaniu pozycji doktorantów na przykładzie Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. W: M. Trawińska, M. Maciejewska (red.), Uniwersytet i emancypacja: wiedza jako działanie polityczne – działanie polityczne jako wiedza (s. 57–73). Wrocław: Interdyscyplinarna Grupa Gender Studies. Retrieved from http://www.gender.uni.wroc.pl/download/ebook_uniwersytet_emancypacja/uniwersytet_i_emancypacja.pdf. ; Kowzan, P., Krzymiński, D., Hurko, K., Życzyńska, J., Koenig, M., Bloch, P., Rainka, D., Mojzykiewicz, M., Bigus, W. (2018). Protestujące dzieci. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja: Kwartalnik Myśli Społeczno-Pedagogicznej, 1, 45–62. ; Kowzan, P., & Prusinowska, M. (2009). Uczenie się (w) ruchu: Studenci przeciw komercjalizacji edukacji. Rocznik Andragogiczny, 208–234. ; Kucinskas, J. (2014). The unobtrusive tactics of religious movements. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 75 (4), 537–550. ; Kwiek, M. (2015). The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 77–89. ; Lenin, W.I. (1951). Co robić? Palące zagadnienia naszego ruchu. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza. ; Leoni, J. (2006). 'Communicating Quietly: Supporting Personal Growth with Meditation and Listening in Schools'. Support for Learning, 21 (3), 121–128. ; MacFarquhar, N. (2015). Seizing Assets in Crimea, From Shipyard to Film Studio. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/world/seizing-assets-in-crimea-from-shipyard-to-film-studio.html?_r=0. ; Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013a). In Defence of the School. A Public Issue. Leuven: Education, Culture & Society Publishers. ; Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013b). The Politics of the University: Movements of (de-)Identification and the Invention of Public Pedagogic Forms. W: T. Szkudlarek (red.), Education and the Political: New Theoretical Articulations (s. 107–120). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. ; Matuszewski, S., & Laskowski, P. (2018). "Rządzący używają pojęcia narodu, by oferować fałszywą dumę". List nauczycieli Liceum im. Jacka Kuronia do uczniów. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from http://wyborcza.pl/7,95891,22981443,rzadzacy-uzywaja-pojecia-narodu-by-oferowac-falszywa-dume.html?disableRedirects=true. ; Mendel, M. (2007). Ometkowane serce szkoły. O tym, jak widać w szkole ślady wielkich korporacji w przestrzeni uczniowskiej i co one znaczą. W: M. Dudzikowa & M. Czerepaniak-Walczak (red.), Wychowanie. Pojęcia, procesy, konteksty. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. ; Midthassel, U.V., Minton, S.J., & O'Moore, A.M. (2009). Conditions for the implementation of anti-bullying programmes in Norway and Ireland: A comparison of contexts and strategies. Compare, 39 (6), 737–750. ; Milerski, B., & Śliwerski, B. (2000). Pedagogika. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ; Milton, S. (2018). Higher Education and Post-Conflict Recovery. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. ; Naczyk, M. (2014). Budapest in Warsaw: Central European Business Elites and the Rise of Economic Patriotism Since the Crisis, 1–30. ; Nowak, J. (2016). The Good, the Bad, and the Commons: A Critical Review of Popular Discourse on Piracy and Power During Anti-ACTA Protests. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21 (2), 177–194. ; Oręziak, L. (2014). OFE. Katastrofa prywatyzacji emerytur w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Książka i Prasa. ; Page, J. (2008). The United Nations and peace education. W: Encyclopedia of peace education (s. 75–83). ; Perelman, A.M., Miller, S.L., Clements, C.B., Rodriguez, A., Allen, K., & Cavanaugh, R. (2012). Meditation in a Deep South Prison: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Vipassana. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51 (3), 176–198. ; Polanska, D.V., Piotrowski, G., & Martinez, M.A. (eds.). (2018). Skłoting w Europie Środkowej i Rosji. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności. ; Ponticelli, J. (2011). Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe, 1919–2008. ; Potulicka, E., & Rutkowiak, J. (2010). Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków: Impuls. ; Radil, S.M., Dezzani, R.J., & McAden, L.D. (2016). Geographies of U.S. Police Militarization and the Role of the 1033 Program. The Professional Geographer, 69 (2), 203–213, https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1212666. ; Ratajczak, M. (2011). Poza paradygmat immunizacji: biopolityka w projekcie filozoficznym Roberta Esposita. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 2–3, 173–186. Retrieved from http://www.praktykateoretyczna.pl/PT_nr2-3_2011_Biopolityka/13.ratajczak.pdf. ; Roth, S. (2015). The Paradoxes of Aid Work: Passionate Professionals. London, New York: Routledge. ; Rutkowiak, J. (2010). Czy istnieje edukacyjny program ekonomii korporacyjnej? W: E. Potulicka & J. Rutkowiak (red.), Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji (s. 13–37). Kraków: Impuls. ; Sayarı, S. (2014). Interdisciplinary Approaches to Political Clientelism and Patronage in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 15 (4), 655–670. ; Sekuła, Z. (2015). Partycypacja pracowników w zarządzaniu a dialog społeczny na poziomie zakładu pracy. Gospodarka Rynek Edukacja, 16 (3), 5–11. ; Sloterdijk, P. (2014). Musisz życie swe odmienić. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ; Smith, H. (2014, marzec). Greece protests over government plans to sell off historic national buildings. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/16/greece-protests-sell-off-historic-buildings. ; Sowa, J. (2015). Inna Rzeczpospolita jest możliwa! Widma przeszłości, wizje przyszłości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B. ; Stahler-Sholk, R. (2007). Resisting neoliberal homogenization: The Zapatista autonomy movement. Latin American Perspectives, 34 (2), 48–63. ; Starego, K. (2012). Sensus communis jako wspólnota równych. Teoretyczne podstawy animacji jako procesu demokratyzacji. Zoon Politikon, 3, 163–188. ; Straubhaar, R. (2012). A Broader Definition of Fragile States: The Communities and Schools of Brazil's Favelas. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 15 (1), 41–51. ; Suchodolski, B. (1983). Wychowanie dla pokoju. W: Wychowanie dla pokoju (s. 11–40). Wrocław: Wszechnica Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Polska Akademia Nauk. ; Sun, K. (2013). China and the Arctic: China's Interests and Participation in the Region. East-Asia Arctic Relations: Boundry, Security and International Politics. Waterloo: The Centre for International Governance Innovation. ; Szadkowski, K. (2017). The University of the Common: Beyond the Contradictions of Higher Education Subsumed under Capital. W: M. Izak, M. Zawadzki, & M. Kostera (red.), The Future of University Education (s. 39–62). London: Palgrave Macmillan. ; Szkudlarek, T. (2005). "Koniec pracy" czy koniec zatrudnienia? Edukacja wobec presji światowego rynku. W: T. Szkudlarek, A. Kargulowa, & S.M. Kwiatkowski (red.), Rynek i kultura neoliberalna a edukacja (s. 13–32). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza "Impuls." ; Szkudlarek, T. (2013). Introduction: Education and the Political. W: T. Szkudlarek (red.), Education and the Political: New Theoretical Articulations (s. 1–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. ; Szwabowski, O. (2014a). Paradygmat i pedagogika. Hybris, 25, 110–138. ; Szwabowski, O. (2014b). Uniwersytet metropolitalny, korupcja i wychowanie przez dług. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja: Kwartalnik Myśli Społeczno-Pedagogicznej, 68 (4), 173–184. ; Szyling, G. (2015). Pytania o ocenianie w szkole wyższej. Zarys zagadnienia. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów, 16, 9–22. ; Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Adults in the Room: My Battle with Europe's Deep Establishment. London: The Bodley Head. ; Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and Politics. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e). ; Walters, R. (2014). Air Pollution and Invisible Violence. W: P. Davies, P. Francis, & T. Waytt (red.), Invisible Crimes and Social Harms. Critical Criminological Perspectives (s. 142–160). London: Palgrave Macmillan. ; Williams, J. (2011). Pedagogika długu. W: J. Sowa & K. Szadkowski (red.), EduFactory: Samoorganizacja i opór w fabrykach wiedzy (s. 95–110). Kraków: korporacja ha!art. ; Włodarczyk, C., & Badora-Musiał, K. (2017). Trwałość niektórych wyobrażeń: niespełnione obietnice profesjonalizmu. Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, 36 (1), 43–62. ; Zalewska, E. (2000). Ideologiczne konteksty działalności zawodowej nauczycieli w okresie transformacji ustrojowej w Polsce. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. ; Zbróg, Z. (2010). Dynamika rozwoju niepublicznych szkół podstawowych. Forum Oświatowe, 43 (2), 143–159. ; Zielińska, M. (2016). Polacy w Reykjaviku: Miejsce, mobilność i edukacja. Gdańsk: Stowarzyszenie Na Styku. ; Zielinska, M., Kowzan, P., & Prusinowska, M. (2011). Social Movement Learning: From Radical Imagination to Disempowerment? Studies in the Education of Adults, 43 (2), 251–267. ; Ziółkowski, P. (2014). Samorząd uczniowski – idee, uwarunkowania i doświadczenia. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Wyższej Szkoły Gospodarki. ; Zomorrodian, A. (2011). New approach to strategic planning: The impact of leadership and culture on plan implantation via the three Cs: Cooperation, collaboration and coordination. ASBBS Annual Conference, 18 (1), 1121–1132. ; 1(9) ; 24 ; 42