Suchergebnisse

The aim of the study is to evaluate the selected limitation of the right to property. The author is of the opinion that establishing the boundaries of property rights in the law system serves the interests of society and supports the economic, social, politicial and economic well-being.

In Hungary, during 2010-2015 the growing xenophobic attitudes are noticed in the society, and right radical extremist groups gain power. The aim of the article is to identify the most significant factors that encourage xenophobia in Hungary. The types of right organizations and their electoral performance are determined. Our hypothesis is that the activity of right extremist organizations influences the formation of xenophobic social practices in Hungary. By means of factor analysis the author identified the main directions and forms of activity of right radicals, determined the value of socio-economic dynamics of Hungary, characterized the attitudes of society, the law and the ruling elite to the problems of xenophobia and right radicalism. Among the most influential factors we should name: open propaganda of nationalist ideas; constitutional priority to the interests of ethnic Hungarians; parliamentary membership of the Movement "For a Better Hungary"; condoning by the ruling elite, the courts and the police of the right radical activity. The paper presents the trend in the contemporary Hungary: the public demonstrates intolerance to right radicalism in cases of criminal behavior, but for the most part is loyal to its ideologies. Except for oppositional human rights organizations and ethnic communities, a significant part of Hungarian society often shows nearly complete indifference to the issues of xenophobia, racial and ethnic discrimination. The author described five groups of factors that stimulate the reproduction of xenophobic attitudes and practices among various groups of the population: "historical", institutional, socioeconomic, legal and political. The paper uses empirical data of public opinion polls conducted by leading research centers in Hungary, as well as statistical data of public authorities, civil society institutions.

This paper analyzes, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It will be achieved, firstly examining, what kind of political, judicial and public opinion context towards the LGBT groups surrounds lesbian and bisexual women. Also it will be answered by analyzing, how the different informants construct the group borders, e.g. Is there an LGBT community or a lesbian and bisexual community, who belongs there, how are the group boundaries constructed inside the group and how do they shift. Also it will be answered by examining, how do different informants see the possibilities of publicity, in order to reach for bigger visibility in the LGBT community and society. The aim of the research is to analyze, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. In the theoretical part of the research is based on feminist anthropology, especially with the focus on the aspects of identity and politics of beloninging, by considering the theory of intersectionality and queer. Research methodology includes: descriptive participant observation, semi-structured and focus-groups interviews, informal conversations. The ethnography reveals, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It shows, that in Lithuania there is quite a negative, homophobic and biphobic political and judicial context towards the LGBT questions, in which lesbian and bisexual women feel discriminated and/or invisible. The paper also reveals, how multilayered and multidimensional is an identity of lesbian and bisexual women and what different meaning does it have to the informants.

This paper analyzes, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It will be achieved, firstly examining, what kind of political, judicial and public opinion context towards the LGBT groups surrounds lesbian and bisexual women. Also it will be answered by analyzing, how the different informants construct the group borders, e.g. Is there an LGBT community or a lesbian and bisexual community, who belongs there, how are the group boundaries constructed inside the group and how do they shift. Also it will be answered by examining, how do different informants see the possibilities of publicity, in order to reach for bigger visibility in the LGBT community and society. The aim of the research is to analyze, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. In the theoretical part of the research is based on feminist anthropology, especially with the focus on the aspects of identity and politics of beloninging, by considering the theory of intersectionality and queer. Research methodology includes: descriptive participant observation, semi-structured and focus-groups interviews, informal conversations. The ethnography reveals, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It shows, that in Lithuania there is quite a negative, homophobic and biphobic political and judicial context towards the LGBT questions, in which lesbian and bisexual women feel discriminated and/or invisible. The paper also reveals, how multilayered and multidimensional is an identity of lesbian and bisexual women and what different meaning does it have to the informants.

This paper analyzes, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It will be achieved, firstly examining, what kind of political, judicial and public opinion context towards the LGBT groups surrounds lesbian and bisexual women. Also it will be answered by analyzing, how the different informants construct the group borders, e.g. Is there an LGBT community or a lesbian and bisexual community, who belongs there, how are the group boundaries constructed inside the group and how do they shift. Also it will be answered by examining, how do different informants see the possibilities of publicity, in order to reach for bigger visibility in the LGBT community and society. The aim of the research is to analyze, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. In the theoretical part of the research is based on feminist anthropology, especially with the focus on the aspects of identity and politics of beloninging, by considering the theory of intersectionality and queer. Research methodology includes: descriptive participant observation, semi-structured and focus-groups interviews, informal conversations. The ethnography reveals, how and in what ways is the commonness and difference of the lesbian and bisexual women created in the context of the LGBT community as well as in the context of a broader society. It shows, that in Lithuania there is quite a negative, homophobic and biphobic political and judicial context towards the LGBT questions, in which lesbian and bisexual women feel discriminated and/or invisible. The paper also reveals, how multilayered and multidimensional is an identity of lesbian and bisexual women and what different meaning does it have to the informants.

The article is dedicated to the analysis of influence of the human rights issue on the development of German-Chinese political relations at the present stage. The author analyses main issues of the Germany- China human rights dialogue, its legal basis, the positions and arguments of the sides. In the author's opinion, one of the main obstacles to the development of cooperation between Germany and China in this area is a different perception of the nature of human rights. The author concludes that both Germany and China in effect are willing to put aside the issue of "human rights violations" and criticism of non-compliance with fundamental civil and political rights of Chinese citizens for the sake of economic and trade cooperation between the two countries.

Adapted from the source document.

The article considers basic approaches to the definition of the right to good administration in modern European and Russian administrative legal science; prospects for implementation of foreign ideas in the Russian legislation are revealed. Modernization of administration is a constant responsibility of the state. Present solutions help to detect the right vector for progressive development of the system of state and municipal administration. Successive transformation of idea for good administration is the priority of development of the Russian Federation, approved legislative acts prove the wish of authorities to build accurate and harmonious relations in man-state system. ; В статье рассматриваются основные подходы к определению «права на хорошее управление» в современной европейской и российской административно-правовой науке, раскрываются направления реализации зарубежных идей в российском законодательстве. Совершенствование управленческой деятельности – это постоянная обязанность государства. Сегодняшние решения позволяют обнаружить верный вектор дальнейшего поступательного развития системы государственного и муниципального управления. Последовательное претворение в жизнь идеи «хорошего управления» с определенной очевидностью является приоритетом развития Российской Федерации, а принимаемые законодательные акты свидетельствуют о желании власти выстраивать четкие и гармоничные отношения в системе «человек-государство».

В статье ставится задача рассмотреть понятия личности, права, государства: правовое государство, права и свободы человека, гражданина. Определить идеи гармонизации отношений личности и государства, фактическое положение человека, масштаб его свободы. Ставятся задачи на определение основных прав и свобод человека и гражданина. Так же в статье классифицируют обязанности: личные; политические; экономические; социальные; культурные. В связи с этим устанавливаются и рассматриваются обязанности гражданина Украины, которые прописаны в Конституции и приведены для общей наглядности. ; The article raises the problem of the study of personality, law and state: the legal state, rights and freedoms of the individual citizen. To define the idea of harmonization of relations of the individual and the state, the actual position of the person, the scale of his freedom. Goals definition of fundamental rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen. The article also classifies responsibilities: personal; political; economic; social; cultural. It addresses the responsibilities of a citizen of Ukraine, which are set out in the Constitution and provides for total visibility. The materials of this article highlight the authority of government and its definition, provides the analysis to understand the state and society.

This article discloses the views on the essence and significance of property rights and other real rights in the contemporary legal order of a market type in the conditions of development and liberalization of the economy; list of real rights, which are new for the domestic civil legislation and are to find their legislative solution; innovative solutions in this field.

This article discloses the views on the essence and significance of property rights and other real rights in the contemporary legal order of a market type in the conditions of development and liberalization of the economy; list of real rights, which are new for the domestic civil legislation and are to find their legislative solution; innovative solutions in this field.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Art. 5, Universal Declaration of Human Rights). According to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, torture means: . any act by which a person is intentionally subjected to severe physical or mental pain or suffering, in particular in order to obtain from this person or from a third party information or confession, to punish him for an act which he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, to intimidate or pressure him or her to intimidate or to put pressure on a third party, or for any other reason based on any form of discrimination, when such pain or suffering is applied by a public official or any other person acting officially or at the instigation or with the express or tacit consent of such persons. No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms). This article was prepared by the Institute for Democracy (Moldova) and is funded by the European Union under the EIDHR (European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights). The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.