During the past two decades, the United Nations Women, Peace and Security Agenda has expanded considerably to cover a wide range of themes and actors. Despite its global diffusion, it has been criticised for its slow implementation and is claimed by some to be mere rhetoric. In line with results-based management, indicators have become key tools in securing monitoring and evaluation of the agenda. This article provides new insights about the concrete use of indicators and responds to the following research questions: How does the use of indicators correspond to the goal of providing monitoring and evaluation data? How can we explain the occurrence of means-ends decoupling? The article examines the country-level use of indicators in Nigeria. The data is collected as part of an indicator ethnography conducted in Nigeria during the spring of 2020. Indicator culture has spread widely, creating an illusion of rationality and effectiveness. Resources, time and money are allocated to operationalization, without questioning the indicator logic itself. The Nigerian case reflects symbolic implementation, where actors maintain well-developed indicator frameworks and monitoring committees without evidence about its actual utility. Over the past four years, not a single monitoring report has been produced. The absence of reporting can be explained through capacity and resource challenges, but also as local actors counteract externally set norms and forms of numerical rationality. Theoretically, the article is based on sociological new-institutionalism and builds on previous feminist peace research. ; Peer reviewed
Finnish local government has been subjected to many reforms in the last few decades. The reforms will continue in the near future as health, social services and regional government are being reformed. Structural reforms and numerous projects have not altered the fact that concrete procedures still change slowly in local governments. This article deals with reforms in local government. It focuses on determining the kind of information and expertise used in the reforms and the expertise required. The research is empirical and focuses on one particular case: preparation of the multi-municipal merger of Oulu region. Research on reforms of local governments, studied from the viewpoints of information and expertise, reveals that traditional public administration structures still have an impact on reform work. Even though steps towards New Public Governance procedures have been taken, reform processes remain strongly based on the information and expertise of the local government organization. Cooperation with different sector actors (the private and third sectors, universities, citizens) takes place from the viewpoint of the local government. The expertise of stakeholders is not at the core of reform processes. Reform processes are based mainly on the existing information and practices. There is much less innovation and less creation and application of new information. The expertise needed in local government reform is diverse. The reform processes have great need for the skills that are typical of network and generative leadership. A successful reform results from the work of a couple of key actors who have the skills to create frameworks for the existence and exploitation of collective expertise.
Laadunarviointi on keskeinen osa koulutuspolitiikkaa, jonka kansallisena tavoitteena on nostaa suomalaiset Euroopan osaavimmaksi kansaksi koulutuksen mittareilla mitattuna. Sillä on paitsi tekninen, myös hallinnollinen funktionsa. Arviointikäytänteet osana koulutuksen hajautettua hallintaa ja arviointikulttuurin lanseerausta ovat leviämässä kansalliselta tasolta kuntien ja koulujen toimintakäytänteisiin. Tässä tarkoituksessa hallinto tukee yhtenäisten itsearviointimenetelmien ja laadunhallintamallien käyttöönottoa paikallisen tason laaduntarkkailussa. Tämän tutkimuksen keskiössä on kysymys koulutuksen 'laadun' konstruktiivisesta muotoutumisesta perusopetusta koskevassa koulutuspoliittisessa diskurssissa ja arviontikäytänteissä. Foucault'n hallinnan analyyttisen näkökulman kautta tutkimus jäsentää laadun muotoutumisen diskursiivisia reunaehtoja suhteessa laadunarvioinnin totuuksiin ja oikeuttamiseen (rationaliteetti), laadun tuottamisen tapoihin ja käytäntöihin (teknologia) sekä subjektin rooliin laatudiskurssissa. Tutkimuksen aineistona on Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisema koulutuspoliittinen teksti "Perusopetuksen laatutyö. Erilaisia tapoja ottaa laatukriteerit hallintaan", joka on kunnille ja kouluille suunnattu laadunarviointia koskeva ohjeistus ja arvioinnin käytännön apuväline. Tutkimuksen tulosten perusteella koulutuksen 'laatu' näyttäytyy ristiriitaisena koulutuspoliittisena empty signifier-terminä, jolla laadun rationaliteetti ja teknologia on sidottu yhteen, palvelemaan samoja yhteiskunnallisia päämääriä. Lähtökohtaiset oletukset 'laadun' yhteiskunnallisen oikeuttamisen ja varsinaisten arviointikäytäntöjen taustalla eroavat kuitenkin toisistaan merkittävästi. 'Laatu' on toisaalta yhteiskunnalliseen muutokseen reagoivaa loputonta liikettä ja kehittymistä laadun idean tasolla ja toisaalta arviointijärjestelmän sisällä tuotettua kuntien ja koulujen systemaattista seurantaa sekä tosiasiana todettua kyvykkyyden mittaamista suhteessa tavoitteisiin. Laadunarvioinnin diskurssi tarjoaa analyysin perusteella laadun muotoutumiselle jatkuvan kehittymisen ideologian ja metodologiset kehykset, muttei välineitä laadun parantamiseen subjektin näkökulmasta esimerkiksi pyrkimällä tukemaan oppilaan oppimisen edellytyksiä. 'Laatu' irrotetaan koulutuksen arjesta, arvoista ja pedagogisista periaatteista neutraalisti tuotetuksi arviointitiedoksi. Laadun subjektit (opettajat ja opiskelijat) esitetään laatutyöhön osallistettavina laadun tuottamisen välineinä. Governed quality? About the nature and definitioning terms of quality in the education policy discourse Abstract Quality assurance is understood as an important part of education policy in which the main goal is to raise Finnish to the most capable people in Europe measured by the indicators of education quality. It has both technical and governmental functions. Quality assurance methods as a part of diffused regime of governing are expanding from the national level into the practices of the municipal corporations and the schools. In this meaning the current regime of governance supports the commissioning of the uniform assurance technigues and models as the forms of local quality control. In the center of this research is the question of 'quality' and the way it is formed in the discourse of education policy and through the modes of quality assurance. The research analyzes the preconditions of this discoursive consept through Foucaults analytic perspective. It pays attension to the truths and legitimation of quality (rationality of government), the quality practices (technique of government) and the role of the subject in the discourse of quality. The data of the research consist of the education policy text "Perusopetuksen laatutyö. Erilaisia tapoja ottaa laatukriteerit hallintaan" (Quality work in Basic education. Ways to take over the quality criteria), published by Ministry of Education and Culture. The text is an instructioning publication for the municipal corporations and schools, amed to support their self evaluation. As a results of the research 'quality' appears as a contradictional 'empty signifier'-concept used as a tool of education policy. By using the consep it is possible to combine the rationalities and the techniques of quality, both serving the societal ambitions. Even so, the main principals behind the legislations of society level and the ideas connected to assurance practices differ from each other significally. On one hand 'quality' is seen as an idea and reaction to the endless movement of the development of society, but on another it is about verifying the 'true' capability of the local actors reaching goals and results; systematic measurement inside the regime of assurance. Thus the education discourse gives for the forming quality two attributes: the ideology of continuing development and the frames of measument, but says nothing about how the subjects/actors could reach those goals in practice by improving the conditions of learning. Governed 'quality' is separated from the ordinary reality of schooling, from the values of teaching and the principals of pedagogy and translated into neutrally produced assurance knowledge. The real subjects of quality (teachers and pupils) are performed as committed instruments of the production of it.
City as a Stage explores the diverse ways in which modern cities of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries presented and projected themselves, especially by staging major urban events, which have often been interpreted as major local and national turning points. In particular, the book discusses how cities were imagined through the prism provided by other cities, major events, as well as alternative pasts and futures. How –with admiration, indifference or contestation– did various urban actors engage with the city as a stage? The book paints a multifaceted picture of the history of urban events and town twinning, while at the same illustrating how students and travellers experienced cities such as Berlin, Rome, Helsinki, and Tampere. As for individual urban events, Stockholm's General Art and Industrial Exposition of 1897, Helsinki's 400th anniversary of 1950, and the Moscow Youth Festival of 1957 are all given their own chapter.
"Drawing on the debate on mediatization of politics this study identifies cultural meanings, institutional practices and styles of argumentation as three theoretical dimensions that illuminate both the construction of journalistic publicity and its potential uses in political action. Based on the theoretical model, environmental politics is identified as a specific context for mediatization. In environmental politics, the interplay of cultural meanings, institutional practices and styles of argumentation define the construction and use of journalistic publicity in a way that differs from other fields of politics.
The empirical part of this study analyzes the newspaper coverage of three Finnish environmental conflicts from 1971, 1994 and 2012. The theoretical model is transformed into an analytical framework that focuses on discursive construction of the conflicts (cultural meanings), journalistic frames, narration and opinion-giving in the coverage of the conflicts and the publicity practices adopted by actors during the conflicts (institutional practices) and legitimation of arguments (styles of argumentation).
According to this study, the relation between media and politics in the field of environmental politics is defined by the increasing cultural significance of environmental protection from the 1970s to the present. In the newspaper coverage of the three environmental conflicts studied, changes on the frames, narration and opinion-giving of journalism resonated with this cultural change. However, the significance of environmental protection in the framing, narration and opinion-giving of journalism was greater in the national newspaper studied compared to the local newspapers selected based on their proximity to the conflict sites. Styles of argumentation appeared to be more case dependent. The increasing cultural significance of environmental protection did not have a clear effect on how arguments were legitimated. "