The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
60222 results
Sort by:
In: International symposium / International Research Center for Japanese Studies 9
In: Associazione Nazionale Enciclopedia della Banca Borsa Working Paper vol. 3, n.1 2013 June
SSRN
Working paper
Although the governmentality literature has occasionally acknowledged the importance of the concept of a liberal truth-regime, there has never been a thorough investigation of the role it plays in Foucault's governmentality lectures. Therefore, this paper begins with an examination of the lectures' "archaeological dimension" that leads to two claims: First, it shows that the crucial conceptual tool in the lectures is the question about the relation to truth that a particular political rationality possesses. Only by looking at the changing truth-regimes of the liberal governmentalities will their differences and continuities come into full contrast. The article's second claim is that this conceptually sharpened understanding of the political rationalities is required for a diagnosis of the present, which reveals that today's dominant governmentality is no longer neo-liberalism but a new liberal rationality: neosocial market economy.
BASE
In: Economics collection
In: Nature, society, and thought: NST ; a journal of dialectical and historical materialism, Volume 12, Issue 4, p. 447-456
ISSN: 0890-6130
In: Asia-Pacific review, Volume 7, Issue 1, p. 1-14
ISSN: 1343-9006
In: Security dialogue, Volume 24, Issue 2, p. 175-179
ISSN: 0967-0106
The recent Chinese decision to develop a socialist market economy system stems from increased understanding of a socialist economy & freedom from conventional socialist economic ideas, & the opening of the People's Republic of China to the outside world. The Chinese program aims to: (1) allow market forces, under state macro economic control, to regulate economic activity & allocation of resources in accordance with laws of value & supply & demand; (2) use state intervention to overcome weaknesses & abuses of the market; & (3) integrate the market economy system with the system of socialism. Measures to speed the pace of economic reform are discussed. D. Generoli
International audience ; Modern economists quickly relegate the issue of international conflict to the realm of political science, despite the increased use of economic weapons. War then becomes a random external shock that the economic variables used cannot predict. The basic assumption is that the market economy and capitalism normally lead to peace. Most economists since the beginning of the 19th century have considered that the progress of economic knowledge necessarily leads to peace. However, the permanence of wars questions and highlights the powerlessness of the market economy to maintain international peace. Capitalism has come to terms with colonialism, imperialism, slavery, while advocating free trade and industry. Heterodox economists question the future role of a capitalism with little concern for the environment, the climate and the growing inequalities between countries and people. ; Les économistes modernes rangent rapidement la question des conflits internationaux dans les réflexions de sciences politiques, malgré l'usage accru des armes économiques. La guerre devient alors un choc externe aléatoire que les variables économiques utilisées ne peuvent prévoir. L'hypothèse de base est de considérer que l'économie de marché et le capitalisme conduisent normalement à la paix. La plupart des économistes depuis le début du XIXe siècle considèrent que le progrès de la connaissance économique conduire nécessairement à la paix. Or, la permanence des guerres interrogent et mettent en évidence l'impuissance de l'économie de marché à maintenir la paix internationale. Les économistes hétérodoxes contestent le rôle futur d'un capitalisme inégalitaire et peu soucieux de l'environnement, du climat et des inégalités croissantes entre les pays et les hommes. Le capitalisme s'est arrangé avec le colonialisme, l'impérialisme, l'esclavage, alors qu'il prône la liberté du commerce et de l'industrie.
BASE
International audience ; Modern economists quickly relegate the issue of international conflict to the realm of political science, despite the increased use of economic weapons. War then becomes a random external shock that the economic variables used cannot predict. The basic assumption is that the market economy and capitalism normally lead to peace. Most economists since the beginning of the 19th century have considered that the progress of economic knowledge necessarily leads to peace. However, the permanence of wars questions and highlights the powerlessness of the market economy to maintain international peace. Capitalism has come to terms with colonialism, imperialism, slavery, while advocating free trade and industry. Heterodox economists question the future role of a capitalism with little concern for the environment, the climate and the growing inequalities between countries and people. ; Les économistes modernes rangent rapidement la question des conflits internationaux dans les réflexions de sciences politiques, malgré l'usage accru des armes économiques. La guerre devient alors un choc externe aléatoire que les variables économiques utilisées ne peuvent prévoir. L'hypothèse de base est de considérer que l'économie de marché et le capitalisme conduisent normalement à la paix. La plupart des économistes depuis le début du XIXe siècle considèrent que le progrès de la connaissance économique conduire nécessairement à la paix. Or, la permanence des guerres interrogent et mettent en évidence l'impuissance de l'économie de marché à maintenir la paix internationale. Les économistes hétérodoxes contestent le rôle futur d'un capitalisme inégalitaire et peu soucieux de l'environnement, du climat et des inégalités croissantes entre les pays et les hommes. Le capitalisme s'est arrangé avec le colonialisme, l'impérialisme, l'esclavage, alors qu'il prône la liberté du commerce et de l'industrie.
BASE
International audience ; Modern economists quickly relegate the issue of international conflict to the realm of political science, despite the increased use of economic weapons. War then becomes a random external shock that the economic variables used cannot predict. The basic assumption is that the market economy and capitalism normally lead to peace. Most economists since the beginning of the 19th century have considered that the progress of economic knowledge necessarily leads to peace. However, the permanence of wars questions and highlights the powerlessness of the market economy to maintain international peace. Capitalism has come to terms with colonialism, imperialism, slavery, while advocating free trade and industry. Heterodox economists question the future role of a capitalism with little concern for the environment, the climate and the growing inequalities between countries and people. ; Les économistes modernes rangent rapidement la question des conflits internationaux dans les réflexions de sciences politiques, malgré l'usage accru des armes économiques. La guerre devient alors un choc externe aléatoire que les variables économiques utilisées ne peuvent prévoir. L'hypothèse de base est de considérer que l'économie de marché et le capitalisme conduisent normalement à la paix. La plupart des économistes depuis le début du XIXe siècle considèrent que le progrès de la connaissance économique conduire nécessairement à la paix. Or, la permanence des guerres interrogent et mettent en évidence l'impuissance de l'économie de marché à maintenir la paix internationale. Les économistes hétérodoxes contestent le rôle futur d'un capitalisme inégalitaire et peu soucieux de l'environnement, du climat et des inégalités croissantes entre les pays et les hommes. Le capitalisme s'est arrangé avec le colonialisme, l'impérialisme, l'esclavage, alors qu'il prône la liberté du commerce et de l'industrie.
BASE
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Volume 49, Issue 4-5, p. 19
ISSN: 0770-2965
In: Crossborder monitor: weekly briefing service for international executives, Volume 10, Issue 22, p. 10