Suchergebnisse

Tom pierwszy, wydanego w czterech woluminach słownika filozoficznego The Philosophical Dictionary: Or, the Opinions of Modern Philosophers on Metaphysical, Moral, and Political Subjects (Londyn, Edynburg; 1786), którego autorem jest urodzony w Austrii lekarz, naukowiec i filozof Franz Xaver Swediaur (1748-1824). Niniejszy tom zawiera alfabetycznie uporządkowany i opatrzony obszernymi wyjaśnienieniami zbiór pojęć, wyrażeń i zagadnień z dziedziny szeroko pojętej filozofii (m.in. metafizyki, filozofii moralności, filozofii polityki etc.) Objaśnienienia zamieszczonych haseł autor opiera na poglądach i opiniach znanych filozofów europejskich. Należą do nich, m.in.: francuski filozof i literat Claude Adrien Helvétius, Helwecjusz (1715-1771); szkocki filozof, historyk i ekonomista David Hume ( 1711-1776); genewski pisarz, filozof i pedagog Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778); włoski prawnik i pisarz polityczny Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794); francuski pisarz, filozof, historyk i publicysta Voltaire, pol. Wolter, właśc. François-Marie Arouet (1694-1778); angielski filozof, lekarz, polityk i ekonomista John Locke (1632-1704); francuski filozof, prawnik, wolnomularz i pisarz Monteskiusz, fre. Montesquieu (1689-1755); irlandzki filozof i polityk Edmund Burke (1729-1797) etc. Struktura pierwszego tomu słownika dzieli się na artykuły hasłowe ułożone w porządku alfabetycznym, od litery A do G.

Preliminary Material -- Listes du personnel, comptes et inventaires annuels du temple de Tebtynis -- Inventaires fragmentaires et lettre d'accompagnement -- Documents sur les pastophores et les théagoi -- Différentes listes du IIIE s. apr. J.-C. -- Rapports isolés de différents temples -- Sur les sources de revenu des temples -- Textes du cartonnage de bousiris (abusir el-meleq) -- Autres textes sur les ressources et les obligations financières des membres du clergé envers l'État.

The work Peri hermeneias (On Interpretation) occupies an important place among Aristotle's logical writings, but in many places, it is hard to understand. The aim of this bilingual edition is to facilitate understanding for a modern reader interested in Aristotelian philosophy and the history of logic through explanatory notes on the text.

Yabu, T.: On relations between Greece and Japan. S. 5-22. Chronopoulos, G.: The Meiji reformation 1868-1890: foundation for a modern state. S: 23-42. Chronopoulosm G.: Christianity in Japan from 1500 to modern times. S. 43-52. Roussos, J.: Ancient Greek tragedy and Noh - a parallelism. S. 53-74. Kostakos, G.: Japan on the international political stage and its role in the framework of the United Nations. S. 75-90. Nikolaou, I.: Threat perceptions in the Asian Pacific region. S. 91-106. Vallianatos, S.: The post-war Japanese policy towards the Middle East. S. 107-134. (Text in griechisch). Spanides, P.: JETRO: A commitment to harmony and import expansion. S. 135-150. Klonos, G.: MITI and its role in the Japanese and world economy. S. 151-158. Yamazaki, T.: The action of the Japanese companies facing the EC internal market integration. S. 159-168. Koutsoubas, T.: Japan: a new market opens up. S. 169-180. Papatriantafyllou, D.: Japanese management. S. 181-190. (Text in griechisch)

The Praecepta Tonica by John of Alexandria (5th-6th cent. AD) is one of our richest sources for ancient Greek accentuation and an indispensable tool for reconstructing Herodian's famous De prosodia catholica. Despite its importance, it is available only in a seriously flawed edition brought out by Karl Wilhelm Dindorf in 1825. The newedition offers an authoritative new critical text based on a thorough review of the manuscript evidence and the modern scholarship, and includes a rich collection of parallel passages intended to place the treatise in its grammatical context

"This is an anthology of private funerary poems in Greek from the archaic period until later antiquity. The vast majority of these poems were inscribed on tombs or grave stelai and served to identify, celebrate and mourn the dead. It is not in fact very difficult to distinguish such 'funerary' poems from other types of inscription, even if there are important overlaps in style and subject between, say, some honorific and some epitaphic verse-inscriptions; what can be much more difficult, however, is to distinguish 'public' from 'private' inscriptions, and indeed to decide what, if anything, is at stake in the distinction and how that distinction changed over time. Our earliest verse epitaphs seem to be 'private', in the sense that, as far as we can tell, they were designed and erected by the family of the deceased. For the fifth century, however, our evidence is predominantly Attic, and, from the first three-quarters of the century in particular, we have very few clearly 'private' such inscriptions, as opposed to those either sponsored or displayed (or both) by public authorities; this was the age of public burials and public commemorations in polyandry or 'multiple tombs', which (quite literally) embodied the spirit of public service demanded of male citizens. 'Private' poems too, of course, reflected the ideology of the city in which they were displayed, and we must not assume that a 'public-private' distinction mapped exactly on to some ancient equivalent of a modern 'official-unofficial' one. 'Private' inscriptions, for example, might need 'public' blessing to be erected in a particularly prominent place or even to use a particular language of praise."--