MOSCOW INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2001 Politics notwithstanding, the 23rd Moscow International Film Festival (21-30 June 2001) was by far the best, programme-wise, in post-perestroika times. The festival catalogue, with a replica of the St. George Statuette Award on the cover, stretched over 235 pages. Moving Pictures was brought in to publish four festival issues in English and Russian on films and events, a move that in turn inspired Russian critics to print a daily bulletin -- titled "Manezh" -- in esoteric Russian and enigmatic English on the competition entries. The city's best venues, including two brand new multiplexes, were booked for festival screenings, most of which started on time and with the very film that was listed in the What When Where Film Guide. Young computer wizards, many with multiple language abilities, replaced a fading phalanx of old-timers at the registration desks. Cafes and restaurants now encircle the Red.
Die Monografie ist international die erste Studie, die den Entstehungsprozess der postsowjetischen zeitgenössischen Kunstmuseen von 1992 bis 2015 analysiert und beschreibt. Anhand von konkreten Fallstudien zeigt sie exemplarisch die oft nicht synchron verlaufende museumspolitische Entwicklung auf staatlicher wie auf lokaler Moskauer Ebene. Sie enthält eine umfassende Quellendokumentation. ; The monograph is the first international study to analyze and describe the process of the post-Soviet contemporary art museums from 1992 to 2015. Based on exemplary case studies, it covers the heterogeneous museum-political development, both on the state as well as on the local Moscow level. In addition, it offers a comprehensive documentation of analogous and digital sources.
In their review of a monograph by A. N. Janushkevich, The Livonian War. Wilno against Moscow: 1558–1570. (Moscow: Kvadriga; Russkaya Panorama, 2013) the author points out that the monograph is a profound study, critically reviewing the preceding research of the military history of the 16th century. The review also analyzes the historical sources of the book as to their completeness and the degree of representativeness, looks into the arguments put forward by the author consecutively considering each chapter, and reveals the innovative conclusions, as well as comments on a number of doubtful statements made by the author. ; В представленной рецензии на книгу А. Н. Янушкевича «Ливонская война. Вильно против Москвы: 1558–1570» (М. : Квадрига : Русская панорама, 2013) резюмируется, что книга производит впечатление серьезного нового исследования, критически суммирующего предыдущие наблюдения по военной истории XVI в. Анализируется полнота и репрезентативность исторических источников монографии, последовательно по главам приводятся аргументы автора, выявляются новаторские выводы и вместе с тем показывается сомнительность отдельных положений автора.
This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).
This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).
Trip to Moscow, and St. Petersburg Russia. ENG117 Essentials in American Studies: Interrogating the America(n) POL 106 Comparative Government and Politics Any two Business classes ; https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/international_flyer/1004/thumbnail.jpg
Hosted by the Union of Architects of Russia and City of Moscow Government, 'Moscow: Ecologies of Urbanism' was an invited public lecture to celebrate the author's contribution to urbanism in Moscow and Russia over the ten year period 2005-2015, culminating in the competition wins for the International Moscow Expansion Competition 2012/13, the Moscow River International Competition 2013/14 and the Public Realm Strategy for the City of Moscow 2014.
The article highlights the emergence of Moscow pledges in Cossack Ukraine. The example of the corresponding pledge in 1677 in Chernihiv analyzed the role and functions of the voivode, provision of food and feed, the order of transfer of the fortress from one voivode to another, the quantitative and qualitative composition of officer and rank, payment military, legal bases for the functioning of the pledge, communication with the central authorities, relations with bourgeois and Cossack governments, the siege of Moscow garrison Chernihiv Hetman Ivan Bryukhovetsky in 1668, forms tion of Russian-Ukrainian mikrospilnoty through marriage with Ukrainian soldiers, part pledge to provide control of Ukrainian lands ruled by the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The emergence of Moscow pledges in the Hetmanate was conditioned by interstate treaties between the Ukrainian and Moscow governments. In their activities, they were guided by Moscow law and current charters and decrees of the tsarist government and the Order of Little Russia, to which they directly obeyed. In addition, they operated under the central pledge of Moscow in Ukraine – the Kiev, represented by the respective governor. Communication and correspondence pledge happened so to speak at three addresses - Moscow (king and order), Kiev (voivode). The third copy of the document identified in the order remained in the deposit archive. Contact with the center was provided by Baturyn Post and messengers – by land by horse transport (carts, sledges) or by river, by boat. Pledges consisted of two components – Russian shooters and soldiers. The latter were commanded by foreign mercenary officers. In addition to combat training, the personnel was responsible for the engineering work to repair and strengthen the fortifications. On it lay various economic works – construction and repair of auxiliary structures ("crates, barns, barns", smithies, etc.), harvesting of grain, fodder, baking of bread, etc. By marital status, it was divided into singles and marital. Many marriages had a ...
The purpose of the study was to review the peculiarities of the functioning of the Moscow pledges on the territory of Hetmanate in the second half of the 17th century, especially in the Chernihiv fortress in 1677. Methodologically the work is based on the socio-cultural approach. The scientific novelty is the first analysis of documents that dealt with various aspects of the existence of the Moscow pledge in Chernihiv in 1677. The results of the study were quite representative to represent the conditions of activity of other pledges within Hetmanate. Conclusions. The article highlights the emergence of Moscow pledges in Cossack Ukraine. The example of the corresponding pledge in 1677 in Chernihiv analyzed the role and functions of the voivode, provision of food and feed, the order of transfer of the fortress from one voivode to another, the quantitative and qualitative composition of officer and rank, payment military, legal bases for the functioning of the pledge, communication with the central authorities, relations with bourgeois and Cossack governments, the siege of Moscow garrison Chernihiv Hetman Ivan Bryukhovetsky in 1668, forms tion of Russian-Ukrainian mikrospilnoty through marriage with Ukrainian soldiers, part pledge to provide control of Ukrainian lands ruled by the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The emergence of Moscow pledges in the Hetmanate was conditioned by interstate treaties between the Ukrainian and Moscow governments. In their activities, they were guided by Moscow law and current charters and decrees of the tsarist government and the Order of Little Russia, to which they directly obeyed. In addition, they operated under the central pledge of Moscow in Ukraine – the Kiev, represented by the respective governor. Communication and correspondence pledge happened so to speak at three addresses – Moscow (tsar and government), Kyiv (voivode). The third copy of the document identified in the order remained in the deposit archive. Contact with the center was provided by Baturyn Post and messengers – by ...
The purpose of the study was to review the peculiarities of the functioning of the Moscow pledges on the territory of Hetmanate in the second half of the 17th century, especially in the Chernihiv fortress in 1677. Methodologically the work is based on the socio-cultural approach. The scientific novelty is the first analysis of documents that dealt with various aspects of the existence of the Moscow pledge in Chernihiv in 1677. The results of the study were quite representative to represent the conditions of activity of other pledges within Hetmanate. Conclusions. The article highlights the emergence of Moscow pledges in Cossack Ukraine. The example of the corresponding pledge in 1677 in Chernihiv analyzed the role and functions of the voivode, provision of food and feed, the order of transfer of the fortress from one voivode to another, the quantitative and qualitative composition of officer and rank, payment military, legal bases for the functioning of the pledge, communication with the central authorities, relations with bourgeois and Cossack governments, the siege of Moscow garrison Chernihiv Hetman Ivan Bryukhovetsky in 1668, forms tion of Russian-Ukrainian mikrospilnoty through marriage with Ukrainian soldiers, part pledge to provide control of Ukrainian lands ruled by the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The emergence of Moscow pledges in the Hetmanate was conditioned by interstate treaties between the Ukrainian and Moscow governments. In their activities, they were guided by Moscow law and current charters and decrees of the tsarist government and the Order of Little Russia, to which they directly obeyed. In addition, they operated under the central pledge of Moscow in Ukraine – the Kiev, represented by the respective governor. Communication and correspondence pledge happened so to speak at three addresses – Moscow (tsar and government), Kyiv (voivode). The third copy of the document identified in the order remained in the deposit archive. Contact with the center was provided by Baturyn Post and messengers – by ...
The purpose of the study was to review the peculiarities of the functioning of the Moscow pledges on the territory of Hetmanate in the second half of the 17th century, especially in the Chernihiv fortress in 1677. Methodologically the work is based on the socio-cultural approach. The scientific novelty is the first analysis of documents that dealt with various aspects of the existence of the Moscow pledge in Chernihiv in 1677. The results of the study were quite representative to represent the conditions of activity of other pledges within Hetmanate. Conclusions. The article highlights the emergence of Moscow pledges in Cossack Ukraine. The example of the corresponding pledge in 1677 in Chernihiv analyzed the role and functions of the voivode, provision of food and feed, the order of transfer of the fortress from one voivode to another, the quantitative and qualitative composition of officer and rank, payment military, legal bases for the functioning of the pledge, communication with the central authorities, relations with bourgeois and Cossack governments, the siege of Moscow garrison Chernihiv Hetman Ivan Bryukhovetsky in 1668, forms tion of Russian-Ukrainian mikrospilnoty through marriage with Ukrainian soldiers, part pledge to provide control of Ukrainian lands ruled by the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The emergence of Moscow pledges in the Hetmanate was conditioned by interstate treaties between the Ukrainian and Moscow governments. In their activities, they were guided by Moscow law and current charters and decrees of the tsarist government and the Order of Little Russia, to which they directly obeyed. In addition, they operated under the central pledge of Moscow in Ukraine – the Kiev, represented by the respective governor. Communication and correspondence pledge happened so to speak at three addresses – Moscow (tsar and government), Kyiv (voivode). The third copy of the document identified in the order remained in the deposit archive. Contact with the center was provided by Baturyn Post and messengers – by ...
By Alexandre Barmine. Significance of the Trotsky trial; interview with John Dewey, by Agnes E. Meyer. Time fights on the side of democracy, by Simeon Strunsky. Editorials from the New York Times
This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).
This collection of essays on Turgenev, Goncharov, Conrad, Dostoevsky, Blok, Briusov, Gor'kii, Pasternak and Nabokov represents diverse voices but is also unified. One invariant is the recurring distinction between "culture" and "civilization" and the vision of Russia as the bearer of culture because it is "barbaric." Another stance advocates the synthesis of "sense and sensibility" and the vision of "Apollo" and "Dionysus" creating a "civilized culture" together. Those voices that delight in the artificiality of civilization are complemented by those apprehensive of the dangers inherent in barbarism. This collection thus adds new perspectives to the much-debated opposition of vital Russia and a declining West, offering novel interpretations of classics from Oblomov to Lolita and The Idiot to Doctor Zhivago.
