Suchergebnisse

Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Indians, Explorers, and Pioneers -- 2. The Privileged and the Dreamers -- 3. Era of Development -- 4. Biscayne National Park -- 5. Biscayne Today -- Key to Courtesy Lines.

National Parks bear greater implications than simply preserving or conserving pockets of landscape. They evoke values of conservation versus development, livelihood economics, environmental stewardship and personal enrichment; they fulfil positions in relation to the national and the international stage. Social characteristics are revealed though this comparative study of Banff National Park and the Cairngorms National Park. Perceptions of space, place and boundaries crucially imply different meanings to the people living inside the national park boundaries and those living outside the boundaries. 'Insiders' are long-term permanent residents for whom being in the park is a practical activity; 'outsiders' include scientists, conservationists, bureaucrats, and tourists, who take various ideological positions regarding the park's purpose. Both sides take a serious interest in the park and how it is managed and regard it as a place where they are 'at home'. Groups within these spaces considers their values and rights superior to others and conflict often arises. Non-violent means of gaining power as theorized by Foucault and Bourdieu, employing knowledge and discourse, are highly suggestive in the study of national parks. Discourse of nature is strategically significant as it influences purpose and policy that drive government's decisions on how the park will be managed - in this way discourse shapes the culture of how we use nature. Knowledge, as symbolic capital and as the basis for truth, sparks divisiveness - in particular scientific knowledge versus experiential knowledge. Changes to the exclusive North American model, such as those instituted in the Caimgorms, mark the increased social utility and inclusive nature of national parks. The challenge remains for park managers to reconcile values connected with nationalism and environmental ethics with values connected with local livelihoods.

"This paper explores the role of social capital and governance in rural development within Slovensky Raj National Park. Based on the theory of Common Pool Resources and Network Governance, the case study explores the external and internal influences on cooperation. Current decision making in the Park is still affected by post socialist relations. In particular inefficient institutional design and non-robust governance of the resources have resulted in over-exploitation of natural resources and treating common property as open-access. On one hand, evidence emerged on domination of interpersonal trust and failure of institutional design. These were found as barriers for the National Park to be viewed by various actors as an asset. On the other hand, municipal and tourism networks show that cooperation is gradually moving from being externally to internally driven, while displaying characteristics of bottom-up development. A hierarchical governance structure is thus slowly opening up, shifting towards networks." (author's abstract)

In promoting a national park in the southern Appalachians, Chase Ambler wrote dozens of editorials and submitted them to newspapers and magazines throughout the east coast. After the editorials were published, the Appalachian National Park Association often reprinted and circulated them as part of their promotional campaign. From notes written on a copy of this one, it appears that 5000 copies of this editorial were made. Chase P. Ambler (1865-1932) was a founding member and long-time secretary of the association. ; Will the Editor please use as much of this as he can. A copy of the paper giving such notice will be appreciated. C. P. Ambler, Secretary. Asheville, N. C. Appalachian National Park* The efforts of the Appalachian National Park Association—the organization which was perfected in Asheville, North Carolina, in November of this year, by citizens of many States, for the purpose of bringing to the attention of Congress the desirability of establishing a great National Park and Forest Preserve in the Southern Appalachian Mountain region, are succeeding far beyond the anticipation of the most urgent supporters of this, great movement. Prominent and influential men in every part of the country have given their aid, numerous newspapers have advocated the project, and as yet no adverse or unfavorable criticism has been heard or written, and it seems practically certain that with a united movement the desired Park can be secured. This unanimous approval and endorsement of the effort to secure this great National Park is but the spontaneous demand of those who are acquainted with the Southern Appalachian region. For where can you And such rare natural beauty as in Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee, or, more definitely speaking, in the Great Smoky Mountains, the Balsam Mountains, and the Black and Craggy Mountains? Here are the most beautiful, as well as the highest mountains east of the lofty Western ranges; forty-three mountains of over six thousand (6000) feet in altitude, as well as a great number of inferior height, all clothed with virgin forests and intersected by deep valleys, abounding in brooks, rivers and water-falls, combine to make this region one of unsurpassed attractiveness. Standing upon the summit of one of these lofty mountain heights, the eye often seeks in vain for a bare mountain side, the evidence of the devastating axe—and before one, stretches out a view magnificently beautiful. If, indeed, the National Parks already established have been chosen for their unusual natural beauty, here is a national park conspicuously fine, awaiting official recognition as an addition to the number. The superb forests of the Southern Appalachian system are superior to those of any other section of the United States, and its variety of hardwoods and conifers is wonderful. Professor Gray, the eminent botanist, says that he encountered a greater number of indigenous trees in a trip of thirty miles through Western North Carolina than can be discovered in a trip from Turkey to England, and through Europe, or from the Atlantic coast to the Rocky Mountain Plateau. Here is the home of the rhododendron, the meeting place of the flora of the North and South, and the only place where distinctive Southern mountain trees may be found side by side with those of the North. Here, too, are found trees of from five to seven feet, and even more, in diameter, which tower to a height of one hundred and forty feet, and these patriarchal trees, though innumerable, are greatest in dense forests of many valuable and beautiful varieties. There i.i but one such forest region in Amer ica, and the neglect of the opportunity now put forth in saving it may work irretrievable loss. The increasing scarcity of timber is causing the large areas of forests to be rapidly cleared by those whose principle thoughts are immediate returns by a system which will result in a few years in the extinction of the forests. The National Park alone can prevent this destruction, and surely it should not delay longer. It is also the duty of the National Government as the guardian of the national interests, not the least of which are the rivers which have their head waters in these mountains, to protect their sources, and the water supply of the country. As to the healthfulness of the region, it is a well recognized fact that the plauteau lying between the Great Smoky Mountains and the Blue Ridge is one of the most popular health resorts in the world. Malaria is unknown. It rivals Arizona as a sanitorium; for those suffering from pulmonary troubles there is no better place. No better spot could be found for the establishment of a sanitorium for the sailors and soldiers of our country. The climate is fine the year around, and by reason of the high altitude, the climate in summer is more agreeable than that of regions farther North. For many years, to those wishing to escape the rigors of the Northern winters, this plateau has become a favorite resort. It has one of the best all year climates in the world. The existing National Parks can only be visited in the summer. If a nation park were established in this mountain region, it could be visited and enjoyed the year around. The location is central. It is only 24 hours' ride from New York, Chicago, St. Louis, Toledo and the Gulf States. It is therefore within easy reach of millions of people and a park there could be in fact as well as in name—a National Park. Apart from these natural reasons, the Eastern States are entitled to a National Park. There is no National Park of the character suggested east of the Yellowstone, which is considerably more than 2000 miles from the Atlantic coast, nor is there even a forest preserve east of Western Dakota, which is but a few hundred miles nearer. The government can easily secure a large boundary of this most beautiful and attractive country. These reasons, and many others, have given this movement popular support. Other arguments could be advanced in its favor; but the Appalachian National Park needs no argument, for the mere mentioning of it alone is sufficient to cause approval of the movement. It is therefore sincerely hoped that Congress will immediately take up the matter and establish the Park. The efforts of the Appalachian National Park association are to be commended. Its promoters are moved only for the public good, and should this movement, finally succeed, the thanks of the entire country will be due to them for their earnest efforts.

Since the first edition of this book was published ten years ago, the U.S. national park system has more than doubled in size, and the National Park Service (NPS) has been subjected to more political manipulation than at any time since the agency was established in 1916. Before 1972, no NPS director had ever been removed for political reasons; sinc

An amendment to Act No. 114/1992 Coll., on nature conservation and landscape protection, as amended, came into effect on 1 June 2017, and was published in the Collection of Laws under No. 123/2017 Coll. What changes did the amendment bring concerning municipalities located in national parks? Did the role of municipalities strengthen upon measuring the interest in nature conservation and rights of municipal self-government? The present paper analyzes the impact of the amendment on municipalities, or rather on the activity in the territory of municipalities located in national parks, and names the principle communal aspects of the amended legislation.

The natural world is full of wonder and awe, and the National Parks of the United States are no exception. The first National Park, Yellowstone, was established March 1, 1872. The National Park Service (NPS), founded August 25, 1916, by President Theodore Roosevelt, is an agency of the United States federal government that manages all national parks, many national monuments, and other conservation and historical properties with various title designations. Since its founding, the NPS has preserved natural and cultural resources and values for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. This analysis attempts to look in depth at National Parks, the species that reside in them, visitor numbers, and visitor reviews on the travel website TripAdvisor. ; https://openriver.winona.edu/urc2018/1004/thumbnail.jpg