Testing neoliberal institutionalism in Southeast Asia
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 779-804
ISSN: 0020-7020
32 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 779-804
ISSN: 0020-7020
World Affairs Online
In: International journal of peace studies, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 29-46
ISSN: 1085-7494
World Affairs Online
In: International journal of peace studies, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 29-46
ISSN: 1085-7494
This article deals with the issue of the environment in international politics & makes a case that the environment as a subject matter is fundamentally different from other political issues. To this effect, the concept of eco-holistic analysis is put forward whereby environmental issues are incorporated into the analysis rather than the structural & systemic forces & constraints within which actors operate. The concept of eco-holistic analysis is based on three pillars (the historical dimension of environment-society relations, the concept of consumption, & equity) which offer new dimensions of analysis highlighting why traditional institutionalist approaches to the study of international environmental politics are lacking in offering suggestions for effective environmental improvement. 41 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Security studies, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 3-43
ISSN: 0963-6412
World Affairs Online
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 97-119
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 69, Heft 2/3, S. 247-261
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Issues & studies: a social science quarterly on China, Taiwan, and East Asian affairs, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 358-361
ISSN: 1013-2511
In: Issues & studies: a social science quarterly on China, Taiwan, and East Asian affairs, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 358-361
ISSN: 1013-2511
In: International organization, Band 42, Heft Summer 1988
ISSN: 0020-8183
Argues that neoliberal institutionalism misconstructs the realist analysis of international anarchy and therefore it misunderstands realism's analysis of the inhibiting effects of anarchy on the willingness of states to cooperate. Highlights the profound divergences between realism and the newest liberal institutionalism. Argues that the former is likely to be proven analytically superior to the latter. (Abstract amended)
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 5-19
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
Neoliberal institutionalism, developed by Robert Keohane, & liberal theory of international relations elaborated by Andrew Moravcsik, nowadays represent two grand International Relations (IR) theories drawing on liberalism as one of the main theoretical approaches in this discipline. However, Keohane conceived of neoliberal institutionalism as a synthesis of realism & liberalism & Moravcsik proceeds from a specific understanding of liberalism & defines liberalism by the criteria of empirical social science. This essay examines, therefore, whether neoliberal institutionalism & liberal theory indeed involve & assemble together the main ideas of liberalism. The perspective applied in the essay is based on the intellectual history of liberalism and, in this way, regards the assumptions about the most fundamental actor in international relations & about the evolution of international relations as the intellectual core of liberalism. According to liberalism, individuals & collective social actors constituted by individuals (social & bureaucratic groups) are the most fundamental actors in international relations & international relations undergo transformation, in the course of which cooperation gradually prevails over conflict. Neoliberal institutionalism considers the state to be the most fundamental actor in international relations & assumes that the nature of international relations transforms & they acquire a more cooperative character. Liberal theory claims that individuals & social groups are the most fundamental actors & that international relations undergo transformation that is marked by the growth of cooperation. Consequently, whereas neoliberal institutionalism involves the intellectual core of liberalism only to some extent, liberal theory implies that there is a grand theory that subsumes the main ideas of liberalism. Adapted from the source document.
In: International organization, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 343-377
ISSN: 0020-8183
Der Autor führt neoliberale und realistische Ansichten zur Bedeutung von Bündnissen zusammen und bietet einen ergänzenden Ansatz für eine Theorie der internationalen Beziehungen. Seine These ist, daß unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen Bündnisse die Konflikte ihrer Mitglieder verschärfen können. Sein Testfall sind die sicherheitspolitischen Beziehungen zwischen der Türkei und Griechenland, insbesondere der Zypernkonflikt, im Kontext der NATO Mitgliedschaft.(SWP-Plb)
World Affairs Online
In: Security studies, Band 7 (1997/98), Heft 4, S. 44-87
ISSN: 0963-6412
World Affairs Online
In: International politics, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 301-321
ISSN: 1384-5748
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 59, Heft 2-3, S. 211-242
ISSN: 0025-8555
The author explores some fundamental aspects of international cooperation, its functional incentives & structural limitations, by describing the discussion between two most influential approaches in international relations theory: neorealism & neoliberalism, or to be more precise, between defensive neorealism & neoliberal institutionalism. During the discussion on possibilities & limitations of international co-operation neorealism & neoliberalism showed their differences, but also similarities of views that resulted in their approach, which is called the neo-neo synthesis in international relations theory. The discussion, that has been going on for three decades in USA also reflects on the practical foreign policy decision-making in this country. The discussion contains the ideas that can serve as means to explain some foreign policy approaches in our country as well. References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 119
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846