Suchergebnisse

The issue of the forms of deciding an administrative case has not yet been analysed in a comprehensive manner. First of all, attention used to be paid to individual forms of deciding on an administrative case, namely: administrative decision, administrative ruling, administrative settlement and deciding an administrative case in a tacit manner. If there were collective generalizations made, they came down to administrative decision and administrative ruling, which are classified as classic administrative acts, while the recent introduction of non-typical forms of deciding an administrative case, i.e. administrative settlement and deciding an administrative case in a tacit manner, makes us re-consider the characteristics of their catalogue; in particular, it should be noted at this point that they constitute a substitute for an administrative decision, which is considered to be a classic administrative act. The evolution of the forms of deciding on an administrative case leads to the conclusion that their relationship with the administrative jurisdiction has ceased to be so obvious. ; Zagadnienie form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej nie było dotąd analizowane w sposób kompleksowy. Przede wszystkim bowiem zwracano uwagę na poszczególne formy załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, a mianowicie: decyzję administracyjną, postanowienie administracyjne, ugodę administracyjną i milczące załatwienie sprawy administracyjnej. Jeżeli dochodziło już do zbiorczych uogólnień, to ograniczały się one do decyzji administracyjnej i postanowienia administracyjnego, które zalicza się do klasycznych aktów administracyjnych. Tymczasem wprowadzenie ostatnio nietypowych form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, czyli ugody administracyjnej i milczącego załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, zmusza do ponownej refleksji teoretycznej nad charakterystyką wyróżnionego ich katalogu. W szczególności należy podkreślić, że stanowią one substytut rozstrzygnięcia administracyjnego, za jaki uznaje się klasyczny akt administracyjny. Ewolucja form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej prowadzi zatem do wniosku, że ich związek z jurysdykcją administracyjną przestaje być oczywisty.

The Monuments of History is a collection of over 100 most valuable monuments in Poland. At the same time, the Monuments of History are one of the 5 forms of protection of monuments, specified in Polish legislation. These circumstances make it necessary to assess the functioning of this form of the monuments protection. Many elements in the concept of the Monuments of History, the procedure of their nomination and the substantive assessment are taken over from the UNESCO World Heritage System. Therefore, this system may be a point of reference for the evaluation of the functioning of the Monuments of History. At the same time, on the basis of this comparison, it is possible to indicate directions for improving the functioning of the Monuments of History. The paper discusses fundamental aspects of the functioning of the Monuments of History – including the place and role of the Monuments of History in the Polish system of the monuments protection, the procedure of nomination, the procedure of evaluation, the relationship of the Monuments of History with the assets of the UNESCO World Heritage. ; Pomniki Historii to zbiór ponad 100 najcenniejszych zabytków w Polsce. Jednocześnie Pomniki Historii to jedna z 5 form ochrony zabytków, określonych w polskim prawodawstwie. Te okoliczności sprawiają, że konieczna jest ocena funkcjonowania tej formy ochrony zabytków. Wiele elementów w koncepcji Pomników Historii, procedurze ich nominowania, oraz merytorycznej ocenie jest przejętych z systemu Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO. Dlatego też ten system możne być punktem odniesienia do oceny funkcjonowania Pomników Historii. Jednocześnie w oparciu o to porównanie można wskazać kierunki doskonalenia funkcjonowania Pomników Historii. W artykule omówiono zasadnicze aspekty funkcjonowania Pomników Historii – m.in. miejsce i rolę Pomników Historii w polskim systemie ochrony zabytków, procedury nominowania, procedurę oceny, relację Pomników Historii z dobrami Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO.

The article presents the institution of an administrative agreement from the perspec-tive of legal solutions in force in selected European countries. The increase in the number and diversity of tasks performed by the administration and the multitude of conducted proceedings encourage the search for alternative forms of settling a case in relation to an administrative decision. The administrative agreement is one of them. The analysis of foreign regulations confirms that the institution in question belongs to the modern procedural laws. The scope of regulation varies, as do the individual solutions concerning the admissibility and mode of concluding the contract, its subject matter, the mechanisms for removing defects, the grounds for contestability of the contract and its enforceability. It turns out that in individual European orders two patterns of regulation dominate: French and German, although they are subject to significant modifications. The performance of certain public tasks by private parties on the basis of an administrative agreement provides for certain guarantees not only for the parties to the agreement but also for the beneficiaries of those tasks. This particular type of contract allows adequate protection of the public interest. The prevalence of the administrative agreement in Europe prompts the author to formulate a conclusion on the need to include this institution in the home system. The attempt made in the 2017 reform of the Administrative Procedure Code to include in it an administrative agreement was unsuccessful. The provisions on an administrative agreement that were then drafted were intended to give a deeper meaning to mediation, a new institution in administrative proceedings, which is currently not popular. Mediation was to precede the conclusion of an administrative agreement. However, there are no significant obstacles to returning to work on the regulation of this institution, which is so widely used in other European countries, and which is clearly lacking in its home Code ; The article presents the institution of an administrative agreement from the perspec-tive of legal solutions in force in selected European countries. The increase in the number and diversity of tasks performed by the administration and the multitude of conducted proceedings encourage the search for alternative forms of settling a case in relation to an administrative decision. The administrative agreement is one of them. The analysis of foreign regulations confirms that the institution in question belongs to the modern procedural laws. The scope of regulation varies, as do the individual solutions concerning the admissibility and mode of concluding the contract, its subject matter, the mechanisms for removing defects, the grounds for contestability of the contract and its enforceability. It turns out that in individual European orders two patterns of regulation dominate: French and German, although they are subject to significant modifications. The performance of certain public tasks by private parties on the basis of an administrative agreement provides for certain guarantees not only for the parties to the agreement but also for the beneficiaries of those tasks. This particular type of contract allows adequate protection of the public interest. The prevalence of the administrative agreement in Europe prompts the author to formulate a conclusion on the need to include this institution in the home system. The attempt made in the 2017 reform of the Administrative Procedure Code to include in it an administrative agreement was unsuccessful. The provisions on an administrative agreement that were then drafted were intended to give a deeper meaning to mediation, a new institution in administrative proceedings, which is currently not popular. Mediation was to precede the conclusion of an administrative agreement. However, there are no significant obstacles to returning to work on the regulation of this institution, which is so widely used in other European countries, and which is clearly lacking in its home Code

The article presents the institution of an administrative agreement from the perspec­tive of legal solutions in force in selected European countries. The increase in the number and diversity of tasks performed by the administration and the multitude of conducted proceedings encourage the search for alternative forms of settling a case in relation to an administrative decision. The administrative agreement is one of them. The analysis of foreign regulations confirms that the institution in question belongs to the modern procedural laws. The scope of regulation varies, as do the individual solutions concerning the admissibility and mode of concluding the contract, its subject matter, the mechanisms for removing defects, the grounds for contestability of the contract and its enforceability. It turns out that in individual European orders two patterns of regulation dominate: French and German, although they are subject to significant modifications. The performance of certain public tasks by private parties on the basis of an administrative agreement provides for certain guarantees not only for the parties to the agreement but also for the beneficiaries of those tasks. This particular type of contract allows adequate protection of the public interest. The prevalence of the administrative agreement in Europe prompts the author to formulate a conclusion on the need to include this institution in the home system. The attempt made in the 2017 reform of the Administrative Procedure Code to include in it an administrative agreement was unsuccessful. The provisions on an administrative agreement that were then drafted were intended to give a deeper meaning to mediation, a new institution in administrative proceedings, which is currently not popular. Mediation was to precede the conclusion of an administrative agreement. However, there are no significant obstacles to returning to work on the regulation of this institution, which is so widely used in other European countries, and which is clearly lacking in its home Code. ; 53 ; 73 ; 2

The development of the information society has initiated the need for creating new instruments with the help of which the authorities can reach out to citizens. Therefore, cyberspace has recently become a place of activity of a number of entities including state and international organizations (together with the European Union). The result of this phenomenon is the creation of the so-called digital diplomacy as new quality in the so-called diplomacy of the EU. The EU diplomacy currently uses a number of e-tools, among others, Facebook, MySpace, Daily Motion, YouTube, etc. These tools are a very good method to improve and warm up the image of the Union in the international arena. This kind of diplomacy was only formed at the beginning of the twenty-first century and has a great prospect of development, thus, it is worth considering in which direction its evolution should follow. Digital diplomacy is a de facto response to the problem of the EU communication with the outside world and the growing number of Internet users. ; Rozwój społeczeństwa informacyjnego zainicjował potrzebę stworzenia nowych instrumentów, za pomocą których władze mogą docierać do obywateli, dlatego cyberprzestrzeń stała się w ostatnim czasie miejscem aktywności wielu podmiotów, w tym państw oraz organizacji międzynarodowych (również Unii Europejskiej). Skutkiem tego zjawiska jest powstanie tak zwanej dyplomacji cyfrowej jako nowej jakości w miękkiej dyplomacji UE. Dyplomacja UE używa obecnie wielu e-instrumentów, m.in. Facebooka, Myspace'a, Daily Motion, YouTube'a itp. Są to bardzo dobre narzędzia służące poprawianiu i ocieplaniu wizerunku Unii na arenie międzynarodowej. Ten rodzaj dyplomacji ukształtował się dopiero na początku XXI w. i ma przed sobą obiecującą perspektywę rozwoju, dlatego warto się zastanowić, w jakim kierunku ewolucja ta powinna podążać. Dyplomacja cyfrowa jest de facto odpowiedzią na problem komunikacji Unii ze światem zewnętrznym oraz na zjawisko rosnącej liczby użytkowników Internetu.

The paper discusses the issue of mediation as one of the forms of solving criminal conflicts. The author presents, among others, the problem of mediation in connection with the principles of restorative justice, the issue of the mediation models accepted in criminal proceedings and also makes an attempt of indicating other forms of conflict solving based on negotiations. The author also makes a brief description of the shaping of lawmaker's motives in the case of mediation and then refers to contemporary issues of mediation proceedings. ; Artykuł obejmuje problematykę mediacji jako jednej z form rozwiązania konfliktu karnego. Autorka przedstawia m.in. kwestię mediacji w odniesieniu do założeń sprawiedliwości naprawczej, kwestię przyjętych modeli mediacji w postępowaniu karnym, a także podejmuje próbę wskazania innych form rozwiązania konfliktu, opartych na negocjacjach. Krótko opisuje historyczny proces kształtowania się założeń ustawodawczych mediacji, by następnie odnieść się do aktualnych, wybranych zagadnień postępowania mediacyjnego.

Corruption is linked to the issue of clientelism. This fact establishes a wide understanding of its phenomenon. This wide context and understanding of corruption is simplified by the recognition of the patron-client system that accompanies corruption or is even identified with it. Clientelism may be of a personal or mass character, and it consists of a mutual provision of services, without the need of laying out funds to achieve a common goal. The socio-economic transformation, being a profound and thorough reform of the system and institutions, promotes corruption practices (the process of transfer of resources from public to private sector progressed swiftly). Corruption provides means for maintaining and developing the client networks. Patron-client relations are of secondary nature in some societies; in other societies they substantially influence the shape of the political and economic system, as well as the social structure. Such relations may transgress the borders between classes

W czasie II wojny światowej wyszła z koncepcją integracji Europy Środkowej we współpracy z Czechosłowacją. Polska tradycja wolności i pokojowych unii z sąsiednimi narodami była alternatywą dla niemieckiej i radzieckiej jedności Europy Środkowej na drodze przemocy. Polski plan pokojowej i dobrowolnej integracji państw Europy Środkowej miał im przynieść bezpieczeństwo i rozwój oraz regionalną solidarność i niezależność od wrogich i sojuszniczych mocarstw. Stałe spotkania polskiego rządu w Londynie z ośmioma emigracyjnymi rządami państw okupowanych miały doprowadzić do powstania subregionalnych związków państw. Miały być jednym z filarów pokoju i bezpieczeństwa w Europie obok mocarstw. Sprzeciw ZSRR uniemożliwił realizację polskich planów. ; During World War II, Poland put forward the concept of the integration of Cen¬tral Europe in cooperation with Czechoslovakia. The Polish tradition of freedom and peaceful union with its neighbors was an alternative to Germany and the Soviet Union uniting Central Europe through violence. The Polish plan of peaceful and voluntary integration of Central European states was to have secured their security and develop¬ment, as well as regional solidarity and independence from hostile and allied pow¬ers. Regular meetings of the Polish government-in-exile in London with eight emigre governments of the occupied countries were expected to lead to the establishment of subregional associations of states. They were to have become one of the pillars of peace and security in Europe alongside European powers. However, opposition from the USSR thwarted the implementation of the Polish plans.

W czasie II wojny światowej wyszła z koncepcją integracji Europy Środkowej we współpracy z Czechosłowacją. Polska tradycja wolności i pokojowych unii z sąsiednimi narodami była alternatywą dla niemieckiej i radzieckiej jedności Europy Środkowej na drodze przemocy. Polski plan pokojowej i dobrowolnej integracji państw Europy Środkowej miał im przynieść bezpieczeństwo i rozwój oraz regionalną solidarność i niezależność od wrogich i sojuszniczych mocarstw. Stałe spotkania polskiego rządu w Londynie z ośmioma emigracyjnymi rządami państw okupowanych miały doprowadzić do powstania subregionalnych związków państw. Miały być jednym z filarów pokoju i bezpieczeństwa w Europie obok mocarstw. Sprzeciw ZSRR uniemożliwił realizację polskich planów. ; During World War II, Poland put forward the concept of the integration of Cen­tral Europe in cooperation with Czechoslovakia. The Polish tradition of freedom and peaceful union with its neighbors was an alternative to Germany and the Soviet Union uniting Central Europe through violence. The Polish plan of peaceful and voluntary integration of Central European states was to have secured their security and develop­ment, as well as regional solidarity and independence from hostile and allied pow­ers. Regular meetings of the Polish government-in-exile in London with eight emigre governments of the occupied countries were expected to lead to the establishment of subregional associations of states. They were to have become one of the pillars of peace and security in Europe alongside European powers. However, opposition from the USSR thwarted the implementation of the Polish plans.

Among the administrative arrangements (porozumienia administracyjne), one should distinguish a category of local-government arrangements (porozumienia samorządowe), i.e. those involving local government units. In the first place, it should be distinguished vertical arrangements, i.e. arrangements between units of different levels of the local government structure: arrangements between poviats (counties) and communes, between voivodeships (regions) and communes, and between voivodeships and poviats. Secondly, horizontal arrangements i.e. between communes, between poviats and between regions. Local government arrangements are a non-sovereign form of activity of the public administration, entered into with mutual declarations of intent of the parties. The basis for their conclusion is a resolution of the legislative body of a local government unit to agree to cooperate under the local government arrangement, while the very act of the arrangement is concluded by the executive body of the local government unit. The purpose of the local government arrangement is to ensure the fulfilment of a public task, to agree on its implementation and the necessary actions. The entrusting of public tasks by means of a local government arrangement is effected under public law and not by a civil contract. The arrangement relates to the implementation of already existing tasks, defined by specific legal provisions, resulting from the legal-systemic position of the parties to the arrangement, so they do not create new obligations arising from the arrangement concluded. ; Pośród porozumień administracyjnych należy wyróżnić porozumienia samorządowe, czyli takie, których stronami są wyłącznie jednostki samorządu terytorialnego. Wyodrębnić należy: 1) samorządowe porozumienia wertykalne, czyli porozumienia między jednostkami różnych poziomów struktury samorządowej (powiatów z gminami, województw z gminami i województw z powiatami), oraz 2) samorządowe porozumienia horyzontalne, czyli międzygminne, powiatowe i wojewódzkie. Porozumienia samorządowe są niewładczą formą działania administracji publicznej. Są one zawierane na podstawie zgodnych oświadczeń woli uczestników porozumienia. Podstawą ich zawarcia jest uchwała organu stanowiącego jednostki samorządu terytorialnego w kwestii wyrażenia zgody na współpracę w ramach porozumienia samorządowego. Akt porozumienia jest natomiast zawierany przez organ wykonawczy jednostki samorządu terytorialnego. Celem porozumienia samorządowego jest zapewnienie realizacji zadania publicznego, uzgodnienie sposobu jego realizacji oraz niezbędnych w tym zakresie działań. Powierzenie zadań publicznych w drodze porozumienia samorządowego następuje w formie publicznoprawnej, a nie w drodze umowy prawa cywilnego. Porozumienie dotyczy realizacji zadań już istniejących, określonych konkretnymi przepisami prawa wynikającymi z prawno-ustrojowej pozycji podmiotów porozumienia, jego uczestnicy nie tworzą zatem nowych obowiązków wynikających z zawartego porozumienia.

In recent decades, society has fundamentally changed; there are political changes affecting education and, consequently, demands on teachers' work change, as well as parents' and society's expectations of teachers. The main aim of this qualitative research is to map the changes in the conditions of teachers' work in the Czech Republic in the last thirty years according to the subjective perception of teachers-experts, i.e. respondents. The respondents are teachers who have been active in the profession for at least thirty years. All the respondents are women working as primary school teachers (Dáša, Lucie, Jana, Danka, Blanka, Dominika, Karolína).In the research we deal with the following areas: interpersonal relationships at the workplace, communication and cooperation with pupils' parents, and the teacher-pupil relationship.The most important results of this research are as follows. The respondents are aware of and perceive the decreasing authority of the teacher today. They point out that the teacher's authority has degraded in the eyes of pupils, parents, and society. The most widespread problem faced by teachers is the disruptive behavior of pupils, which may interfere with teaching.Moreover, today's teachers sometimes have to deal with parents who are completely uncritical of their children, whom they trust completely. When problems arise, these parents never see the root cause in their child but in other classmates or, most frequently, in the teacher. If a child receives a bad grade, these parents are willing to go to the teacher and try to find the error on their side rather than in their own children.

In recent decades, society has fundamentally changed; there are political changes affecting education and, consequently, demands on teachers' work change, as well as parents' and society's expectations of teachers. The main aim of this qualitative research is to map the changes in the conditions of teachers' work in the Czech Republic in the last thirty years according to the subjective perception of teachers-experts, i.e. respondents. The respondents are teachers who have been active in the profession for at least thirty years. All the respondents are women working as primary school teachers (Dáša, Lucie, Jana, Danka, Blanka, Dominika, Karolína).In the research we deal with the following areas: interpersonal relationships at the workplace, communication and cooperation with pupils' parents, and the teacher-pupil relationship.The most important results of this research are as follows. The respondents are aware of and perceive the decreasing authority of the teacher today. They point out that the teacher's authority has degraded in the eyes of pupils, parents, and society. The most widespread problem faced by teachers is the disruptive behavior of pupils, which may interfere with teaching.Moreover, today's teachers sometimes have to deal with parents who are completely uncritical of their children, whom they trust completely. When problems arise, these parents never see the root cause in their child but in other classmates or, most frequently, in the teacher. If a child receives a bad grade, these parents are willing to go to the teacher and try to find the error on their side rather than in their own children.

The article deals with work after the political transformation of 1989 in the light of contemporary literary accounts in the prose of Andrzej Stasiuk, Dawid Bieńkowski, Piotr Siemion, Daniel Odija, and others. The literary works are taken to contain records of personal and social problems, captured as objectivised experience of many individuals. An attempt is made to adapt the methodological proposals characteristic of the poetics of experience to selected approaches to work in contemporary literature. These approaches include: the shortage of work as the key element of social change, part-time work, physical work (often considered inferior and unfulfilling), work on a marketplace (as the release of subdued energy), the work of a small-business entrepreneur (along with bankruptcy as an inalienable element of the experience), and work connected with new forms of capitalist corporate context. The experience of work in the times of transformation, as it appears in literature, is presented in terms of failure, exclusion, exploitation, more than a mirage of careers – although the latter approach is also present, albeit often in the context of irony and parody. In the writers' view, the Polish reality after the transformation reveals a deep social disintegration, while individuals, forced to become self-reliant, do not always win when confronted with the new, capitalist reality. ; Autor zajmuje się doświadczeniem pracy w czasach transformacji ustrojowej po roku 1989 w świetle współczesnych świadectw literackich zawartych w prozie Andrzeja Stasiuka, Dawida Bieńkowskiego, Piotra Siemiona, Daniela Odii i innych. Utwory literackie traktuje jako zapis problemów jednostkowych i społecznych, ujętych w aspekcie obiektywizacji doświadczenia, będącego udziałem wielu jednostek. Propozycje metodologiczne, wypracowywane w ramach poetyki doświadczenia stara się zaadaptować do próby prześledzenia kilku wskazanych ujęć problematyzacji doświadczenia pracy w literaturze najnowszej. Do tych ujęć należą: ukazywanie braku pracy jako kluczowego kontekstu zmiany społecznej, następnie: praca dorywcza, fizyczna, ujmowana często jako praca wstydliwa, nieprzynosząca satysfakcji, praca bazarowa, ukazywana jako wyzwolenie tłumionej energii, praca drobnego biznesmena – wraz z bankructwem jako nieodłącznym elementem tego doświadczenia – oraz praca związana z nowymi formami kapitalistycznego korporacjonizmu.Doświadczenie pracy czasów transformacji w świetle ujęć literackich przedstawiane jest częściej w kategoriach klęski, wykluczenia, wyzysku niż mirażu karier, choć i takie ujęcia pojawiają się – jednak często w konwencjach ironicznoparodystycznych. Zdaniem pisarzy w polskiej rzeczywistości po przełomie ujawnia się głęboka dezintegracja społeczna, zaś jednostki, zdane na siebie, nie zawsze wychodzą zwycięsko w konfrontacji z nową, kapitalistyczną rzeczywistością.

During the restitution of the Polish Statehood in 1918, the individual provinces maintained the laws of the previous occupying powers with regard to regulating the freedom of the press and specific procedures of the oversight that state authorities had over the press activities. Since January 1919, there was an option to impose a confiscation of any publication in the part of Polish Republic, in which a martial law was in effect. This route, allowing for the introduction of preventive censorship, was used in June 1919 by the Supreme People's Council, an organization that was in power in the Wielkopolska district (of the former Prussian partition). The volatile situation at the front of the Polish–Bolshevik war prompted the Polish authorities to uniform the laws regarding preventive censorships. Subsequently, the Council of National Defense issued on July 19th, 1920 a decree introducing the preventive censorship on the territory of the Polish state. Despite the lack of respective executive directives from the Ministries of Internal Affairs and Ministry of Former Prussian Partition, the Poznań city mayor [starosta grodzki] started implementing the preventive censorship regulations already on July 22, 1920. These restrictions pertained to publications relevant to the army and matters of state defense. However, the implementation of these regulations was aborted after the Polish Parliament approved on October 29, 1920 a bill abolishing a preventive censorship. Nonetheless, the Wielkoposka district waited until November 25, 1920 when the Poznań city mayor [starosta grodzki] issued a document revoking his previous decree about preventive censorship. ; Agnieszka Uziębło

The aim of the study is to draw attention to new forms of democracy that are decomposing modern parliamentarism. They break the link between the election of representative bodies (parliaments) and general elections. The introduced forms of citizen representation are based on the sampling method. It is a return to the roots of Athenian democracy and the political practice of national sovereignty. These innovative forms include deliberative democracy and participatory democracy. The most famous form of deliberative democracy are citizens' assemblies. The aim of citizens' assemblies is to develop a consensus and restore confidence in the non-party way of making political decisions. They try to solve important social and political problems. In Ireland, they led to a constitutional amendment. It was not only the media success of this new form of citizen representation. The use of the latest information and communication technologies is also reflected in contemporary parliamentarism. They contribute to the accumulation of information in the hands of the government. This increases its informal position. Against this background, the concepts of media democracy and smartphone democracy appear. These new phenomena also contribute to the decomposition of the parliamentarism of our time. ; Celem opracowania jest zwrócenie uwagi na nowe formy demokracji, które dekomponują współczesny parlamentaryzm. Rozrywają one związek pomiędzy wyłanianiem ciał przedstawicielskich (parlamentów) z wyborami powszechnymi. Wprowadzane formy reprezentacji obywateli opierają się na metodzie losowania. Jest to powrót do korzeni demokracji ateńskiej i politycznej praktyki suwerenności narodu. Do tych nowatorskich form należy zaliczyć demokrację deliberatywną i demokrację uczestniczącą. Najbardziej znaną formą demokracji deliberatywnej są panele obywatelskie. Celem paneli obywatelskich jest wypracowanie konsensusu oraz przywrócenie zaufania do pozapartyjnego sposobu podejmowania decyzji politycznych. Starają się one rozwiązywać ważne problemy społeczne i polityczne. W Irlandii doprowadziły do zmiany konstytucji. Był to, nie tylko medialny, sukces tej nowej formy reprezentacji obywateli. Stosowanie najnowszych technologii informatycznych i komunikacyjnych znajduje swoje odzwierciedlenie także we współczesnym parlamentaryzmie. Przyczyniają się one do kumulowania informacji w rękach rządu, co zwiększa jego nieformalną pozycję. Pojawiają się tu pojęcia demokracji medialnej i demokracji smartfonowej. Te nowe zjawiska przyczyniają się także do dekompozycji parlamentaryzmu naszych czasów.