Open Method of Coordination
In: EU Administrative Law, S. 191-233
4243198 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: EU Administrative Law, S. 191-233
In: Tools for Policy Learning and Policy Transfer. Supporting Regional Lifelong Learning Policies., S. 9-15
In: Tools for policy learning and policy transfer: supporting regional lifelong learning policies, S. 9-15
In: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 45/2016
SSRN
Working paper
In: East West Review of Labor Law & Social Policy, Band 12, Heft 2007, S. 1
SSRN
In: Towards an Effective European Single Market, S. 127-141
In: The journal of legislative studies, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 62-77
ISSN: 1743-9337
In: European Law Journal, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 505-522
SSRN
In: Radaelli, Claudio M. and Susana Borras (2014) Open method of coordination for demoi-cracy? Standards and purposes, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 21.
SSRN
In: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2601
SSRN
In: European Law Review, Band 34, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Policy & politics, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 21-37
ISSN: 1470-8442
One of the most discussed issues surrounding the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) is the way in which it influences national social policies. This article argues that the question of influence is incorrectly posed. Instead, the OMC has to be understood as a 'two-level game' in which member state governments and non-governmental actors try to have an impact on the definition of the OMC objectives and, subsequently, strategically and selectively use the OMC in national policy-making processes. This, however, entails problems in terms of the transparency of policy-making processes and the accountability of national governments.
In: Policy & politics: advancing knowledge in public and social policy, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 21-37
ISSN: 0305-5736
One of the most discussed issues surrounding the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) is the way in which it influences national social policies. This article argues that the question of influence is incorrectly posed. Instead, the OMC has to be understood as a 'two-level game' in which member state governments and non-governmental actors try to have an impact on the definition of the OMC objectives and, subsequently, strategically and selectively use the OMC in national policy-making processes. This, however, entails problems in terms of the transparency of policy-making processes and the accountability of national governments. Adapted from the source document.
In: O. De Schutter and S. Deakin, Social Rights and Market Forces. Is the open coordination of employment and social policies the future of Social Europe?, Bruylant: Bruxelles, 2005, p. 279-343
SSRN
In: European Integration - Online Papers, Band 13