Participatory planning
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 56, Heft Spring 92
ISSN: 0036-8237
4019 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 56, Heft Spring 92
ISSN: 0036-8237
High hopes for democracy and sustainability are placed on participatory planning. Policy makers and scholars argue that broad participation can revitalise democracy and tackle sustainability challenges. Yet, critics claim that power asymmetries stand in the way of realising the potential of participatory planning. In the everyday practices of planning, this controversy comes to a head. Here, planners interact with citizens, politicians and developers around making choices about places and societies. Planners' practices are contested and they are challenged by the complexity of power relations. They need conceptual tools to critically reflect on what power is and when it is legitimate. Reflective practice is a prerequisite for making situated judgements under conditions of contestation. Yet, the planning theories, which are most influential in practice, have not been developed with the intention of conceptualising power. Rational planning theory, which still is influential in practice, largely reduces planning into a technical power-free activity. Communicative planning theory, which underpins participatory practices, instead suggests that expert power ought to be complemented by inclusive dialogue. This theory criticises hierarchical power relations as domination, without providing elaborated understanding of other facets of power. Hence, the conceptual support for reflective practice is too reductive. The aim of this thesis is to rethink power in participatory planning by developing concepts that can enable reflective practice. I draw on power theory and explore the utility of treating power as a family resemblance concept in participatory planning. Applying this plural view, I develop a family of power concepts, which signifies different ideas of what power is. The usefulness of this "power family" is tested through frame analysis of communicative planning theory and Swedish participatory planning policy and practice. The result of the research is a family of power concepts that can enable reflective practice. 'Power to' signifies a dispositional ability to act, which planning actors derive from social order. This ability can be exercised as consensual 'power with' or as conflictual 'power over'. The latter is conceptualised as an empirical process which, on a basic level, can be normatively appraised as illegitimate or legitimate. This thesis contributes to planning theory and environmental communication by problematising reductive notions of power and, as an alternative, rethinking power as a family resemblance concept. This theoretical contribution matters to planning practice as it can enable planners to develop their ability to be sensitive to what a situation requires, i.e. to acquire practical wisdom (phronesis).
BASE
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 24, Heft 3-4, S. 67-89
ISSN: 1552-8502
This paper consists of a critical analysis of the British school of market socialism and a discussion of participatory planning as an alternative model for a socialist economy. It concludes that market socialism's claim to combine efficiency with socialist objectives is incoherent and that, unlike market socialism, models of participatory planning have the potential to contribute to the renewal of the socialist project.
In: Science & Society, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 72-85
In: Forced migration review, Heft 11, S. 22-24
ISSN: 1460-9819
In: The Indian journal of public administration: quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 79-92
ISSN: 0019-5561
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 79-92
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 72-85
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 275-295
ISSN: 0032-2687
Arguments are presented for reconsideration of models which guide planning behavior & structure planning organizations. Hierarchical organizations are compared with reticular organizations. The latter are presented as necessary for effective citizen participation. Legitimacy is presented as a fundamental basis of justifying planning action. Historical shifts in forms of legitimacy are discussed. Participation, as a form of legitimacy, & several aspects of participatory planning are analyzed in terms of recent systems theory. Participatory planning, increases the effectiveness & adaptivity of the planning process & contributes adaptivity & stability to the societal system. Citizen participation is an essential element in making the planning process a learning system. This leads to an unexpected requirement of planners who would adopt a participatory planning process & a strengthening of the definition & role of communities in the Ur system. The elements of the developmental process (developed by R. W. White & other developmental psychologists); actualization, differentiation, & integration may also be attributes of the developmental process of community participation. Modified HA.
In: Wong, Y. L. (2023). What is Participatory Planning in the Urban Setting?. Inclusion Matters. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. https://lkyspp.nus.edu. sg/research/social-inclusion-project
SSRN
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 97-112
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 275-295
ISSN: 1573-0891
In: Planning theory, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 425-442
ISSN: 1741-3052
The critical literature on participation warns that a focus on 'consensus' evades the political in planning, preventing citizens from confronting and challenging discourse and prevailing orthodoxy about the way the urban ought to be constituted. These critiques raise important questions about the efficacy of participatory planning and its political formation. Moreover, the extent to which citizen's participation can ever challenge dominant trajectories has reached a point of conceptual 'crisis'. In this article, I explore the different ways in which participation manifests from the politicising participatory moments in planning. Examining a single case study in Melbourne, Australia, I draw upon 15 key informant interviews with community campaigners who mounted a successful campaign to defeat the controversial East West Link road project. By examining the formal and informal political manifestations of participation over a period of 2 years, this article challenges the sentiment that there is a crisis of participatory planning. It shows how decisions to engage the citizenry in prescribed ways induce other manifestations and formations of citizen's participation through politics and how these manifestations garner a pervasive and influential trajectory to reshape participatory planning.
In: Society and natural resources, Band 27, Heft 5, S. 475-491
ISSN: 1521-0723