The subject of the study is the process of formation of strategic relations between Ukraine and the EU. The purpose of this study is to determine the conditions for the transformation of international cooperation into a strategic partnership and to assess the parity of the economic component of the strategic partnership between Ukraine and the EU. Research methodology – proposed by the author. Results of work. The conditions of transformation of international cooperation into strategic partnership are determined. The proposed method of estimating the parity of the economic component of the strategic partnership. The disparity in cooperation between Ukraine and the European Union, its causes and ways of overcoming is substantiated. Conclusions: parity of the economic component of the strategic partnership between Ukraine and the EU can be ensured by the equivalent technological and status external trade balance; partner exchange of scientific achievements, jointly developed scientific and educational programs in the context of the scientific and educational component; development of tourism, joint sporting and cultural activities within the cultural component.
The research is devoted to the analysis of social partnership in Ukraine. In the article, there are considered theoretical problems regarding the definition of social partnership as a phenomenon. This phenomenon is described as a relationship between subjects of labour law. It is revealed the status of the subjects of social partnership; the object of these relations and their content are determined. It is proved that two subjects of labour law (employees and employers) in the social partnership act through their representatives, the third entity – the state is a specific subject and always acts through its bodies. In this paper, the social dialogue is described as an object of social-partnership relations, namely: social dialogue is a voluntary process of making agreed decisions; social dialogue is inex- tricably connected with the coexistence of the rights and interests of employees, employers, and the state; the specifics of social dialogue is its transparent character, which consists in the stratification of its substantive spheres; social dialogue cannot be separated from labour relations; an object of social-partnership relations is not the result of reached agreements but the process of achieving these agreements; a social dialogue exists in certain forms in the law; a social dialogue is an indicator of the moral and ethical state of society. In this paper, in accordance with the current legislation, there are defined the corresponding rights and obligations of social partners that form stable legal relations between them.Social partnership as a social phenomenon can act as an instrument for managing the interests of participants in relations in the field of labour. Becoming the status of participants in social-partnership relations, the parties balance the mutual requirements and claims by concluding collective agreements and contracts. "Social Dialogue" as actions of the participants of the relations provides the opportunity to find the ways of providing the interest balance in the labour sphere not only to employees and the employer but also to the state, whose interest at least ensures the provision of social peace and harmony in society by means of contractual means on the basis of voluntary wills of the parties. ; Робота присвячена аналізу соціального партнерства в Україні. У статті розглянуто теоретичні проблеми щодо визначення соціального партнерства як явища, охарактеризоване це явище як відносини між суб'єктами трудового права. Розкрито статус суб'єктів соціального партнерства, визначено об'єкт цих відносин та їх зміст.
Main objective of the study is the analysis of the environmental governance in the Eastern Partnership countries. Methodology of the study includes an analysis of the European Union and the countries of the Eastern Partnership documents devoted to the implementation of the environmental governance principles. The study clarifies the concepts of "governance", "environmental governance", "European environmental governance". The main principles and values of the European environmental governance are determined. The environmental vector of the Eastern Partnership and measures that promote the implementation of environmental governance, in particular the Flagship initiative of the Eastern Partnership on Effective Environmental Governance (2009) and the Ministerial Declaration on Environmental Cooperation and Climate Change (2016) have been analyzed. The results of the study show the role of the European Union in improving governance and conducting effective reforms in the Eastern Partnership countries, including the implementation in the environmental policy such European values as democracy, rule of law, engagement, transparency, impact assessment. It has concluded that during 2009–2017, there was a certain progress in the implementation of environmental governance in Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, but still there are many problems on this way. Ukraine, the first one among the Eastern Partnership countries, has developed a "soft" instrument for implementing the principles of good environmental governance, which has been put in the "Roadmap for the implementation of the provisions of the Luxembourg Declaration" (2017). This document is currently under development. The significance of the study is in the determining the key role of the European values in the implementation of environmental governance and proposal for their wider inclusion not only in this document, but in practices in Ukraine.
The article describes scientific and methodological provisions on the economic substantiation of project decisions in the sphere of public-private partnership in the conditions of investment and innovation activity development, which, unlike the existing ones, allow to determine the upper and lower boundariesof private partner's income from the partnership project implementation. The lower boundary includes the costs of the private partner incurred by him in the process of public-private partnership project implementation. The upper bound relates to the real benefits of such a project. The problem of economic substantiation of project decisions in the field of public-private partnership is considered in the context of public and private partners. The main directions of effectiveness analysis of public-private partnership projects for the public partner, regulated by the current legislation, have been identified.
The article describes scientific and methodological provisions on the economic substantiation of project decisions in the sphere of public-private partnership in the conditions of investment and innovation activity development, which, unlike the existing ones, allow to determine the upper and lower boundariesof private partner's income from the partnership project implementation. The lower boundary includes the costs of the private partner incurred by him in the process of public-private partnership project implementation. The upper bound relates to the real benefits of such a project. The problem of economic substantiation of project decisions in the field of public-private partnership is considered in the context of public and private partners. The main directions of effectiveness analysis of public-private partnership projects for the public partner, regulated by the current legislation, have been identified.
Actuality. Today the institute administrative agreement met with a number of problems, particularly in the application. Since the legislation stipulates only the concept of the contract and its affiliation to the jurisdiction of administrative courts, so comparing it with the contract as a form of exercise of public-private partnership provides the opportunity to clarify the legal nature of administrative contracts, cases and ways of use, selection procedure and parties contract, scope.The purpose of research is to identify common and distinctive features of contracts under public-private partnership and administrative contracts through a comparative analysis of research and legislation.The question of choice rational means of influencing the socio-economic processes in order to improve governance practices in the market conditions of the state and society faced by domestic and foreign scientists. Among the researchers separated the two areas - promotion of dynamic processes and improve the institutions of national socio-economic systems.It reveals the potential role of administrative agreements as forms of public-private partnerships. The analysis of foreign practice in the relationship between the concepts of contracts under public-private partnership and administrative contracts. Established the common features, manifested in the nature of relationships, the legal status of potential parties, objective conclusion - meet social needs and interests.Contracting is a form of public-private partnerships. The law referred to such agreements concession contracts, joint activities of property management and other contracts. Scientists analyzing the global practice, as contracts allocate (administrative contracts) lease (leasing), public-private enterprises.We should focus on the proposed implementation of the scientists form a public-private partnership - administrative contract. In terms of public-private partnership administrative contract - a contract concluded between the state (local government) and private company to carry out defined socially necessary and useful activities. The most common practice in public-private partnerships are contracts for works, public service management, supply goods for state needs, providing technical assistance.The aim of the study was to analyze the different types of contracts awarded under a public-private partnership and administrative contracts in terms of possible parties, their legal status, the legal nature and the final expected result. Based on the comparison of conclusions that some of the agreements - forms of state-powerful partnership can be attributed to administrative contracts. They include only those in which one of the parties is a public authority or local government, has the authority, that enters into a contract for the implementation of administrative functions in order to maintain public interest. Exceptions are mixed type agreements which under the law have civil nature and cannot be recognized administrative contracts.Administrative agreements have the same ideological foundations. First of all, they are aimed at ensuring the public interest - the public interest, without pleasure, that cannot, on the one hand, to realize private interests, on the other - to ensure the integrity, stability and normal development organizations, states, nations, social groups and society as a whole. Of course depending on who is the other side in the relations arising under such contracts there is private interest. Certainly in administrative agreements in which the other party is also the subject of power, it is not about the availability of private interest. In other cases, we can speak of private interest, manifested in receiving payment, expanding the market to attract investment.
The aim of the article is to analyze the state of PPP in Ukraine, to identify political and economic features, advantages, disadvantages and risks for stakeholders, to identify blocks of barriers that prevent PPP in a market economic system. In solving the tasks we used a number of research methods: analysis, synthesis and comparison of the features of public-private partnership for stakeholders. A successful platform for the development of public-private partnership (PPP) is a mutually beneficial relationship between all stakeholders. Public management often determines the vectors of development of industries, spheres and regions for effective investment activities, taking into account the development strategy. It should be noted that the advantages of PPP include the fact that the efficiency of management of both state and municipal property increases; the quality of public services to the population and businesses; conditions are created for the use of modern achievements of science and technology, innovations are introduced; the burden on the state budget is reduced and expenditures on the provision of public services are optimized. Along with the advantages, there are a number of disadvantages of PPPs related to the implementation of projects. These include: certain difficulties associated with obtaining permits and approvals; procedure of complexity in re-registration of the right of use of the earth on the private partner; insufficient motivation and lack of professional training of officials, the presence of corruption. The scientific novelty is that for the first time the political and economic features of public-private partnership are analyzed, which in a market economy are clearly manifested through the relations between stakeholders - stakeholders. The development of public-private partnership has achieved key changes and has a positive dynamics: updated legal framework on PPP and concessions, opening of external proposals for initiation of potential partners of national or regional PPP projects, ...
Статтю присвячено стану реалізації програми «20 очікуваних досягнень Східного партнерства до 2020 року» за 10 років після запровадження партнерства України, Молдови, Білорусії, Вірменії, Азербайджану та Грузії. Визначено особливості сучасного стану партнерства і окреслено загальну структуру його майбутнього розвитку. Наведено оцінку стану справ на основі комплексного аналізу основних інформаційних джерел з проблематики дослідження.Акцентовано увагу на результатах і проблемах, що існують у процесі реалізації ініціативи «Східного партнерства» в нових геополітичних реаліях. Характеризуються сфери партнерства, де Україна демонструє позитивні зрушення, а також виклики на цьому шляху. Прогнозуються перспективи вдосконалення партнерства, а також шляхи подолання кризових явищ у міждержавних відносинах членів об'єднання в нових політичних реаліях ; The article is devoted to the state of implementation of the program «20 Expected Achievements of the Eastern Partnership till 2020» in 10 years after the implementation of the partnership between Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The peculiarities of the current state of partnership are defined and the general structure of its future development is outlined. The attention is focused on the results and problems that exist during the implementation of the Eastern Partnership initiative in the new geopolitical realities. The results and case studies are presented on the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the main information sources on the research issues. The article characterizes the partnership areas where Ukraine is showing positive developments and also the article outlines some challenges along the way. The prospects for improving the partnership, as well as ways to overcome the crisis phenomena in the interstate relations of the members of the association in the new political realities are projected
The article is devoted to the state of implementation of the program «20 Expected Achievements of the Eastern Partnership till 2020» in 10 years after the implementation of the partnership between Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The peculiarities of the current state of partnership are defined and the general structure of its future development is outlined. The attention is focused on the results and problems that exist during the implementation of the Eastern Partnership initiative in the new geopolitical realities. The results and case studies are presented on the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the main information sources on the research issues. The article characterizes the partnership areas where Ukraine is showing positive developments and also the article outlines some challenges along the way. The prospects for improving the partnership, as well as ways to overcome the crisis phenomena in the interstate relations of the members of the association in the new political realities are projected ; Статтю присвячено стану реалізації програми «20 очікуваних досягнень Східного партнерства до 2020 року» за 10 років після запровадження партнерства України, Молдови, Білорусії, Вірменії, Азербайджану та Грузії. Визначено особливості сучасного стану партнерства і окреслено загальну структуру його майбутнього розвитку. Наведено оцінку стану справ на основі комплексного аналізу основних інформаційних джерел з проблематики дослідження.Акцентовано увагу на результатах і проблемах, що існують у процесі реалізації ініціативи «Східного партнерства» в нових геополітичних реаліях. Характеризуються сфери партнерства, де Україна демонструє позитивні зрушення, а також виклики на цьому шляху. Прогнозуються перспективи вдосконалення партнерства, а також шляхи подолання кризових явищ у міждержавних відносинах членів об'єднання в нових політичних реаліях
Introduction. Currently, there is a need to introduce an appropriate mechanism of interconnections between the private sector and government agencies, which should be aimed at improving the state of social partnership by attracting financial resources of socially oriented entrepreneurial construction structures. The study's relevance was assessed by a better use of financial resources to ensure correct and timely accounting and management. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to reveal the essence and importance of financial resources for the development of social partnership and to reflect these resources in the system of accounting and taxation of enterprises of the construction industry.Methods. Research methods are based on a dialectical method of understanding the problems of using the financial resources of enterprises of the construction industry and the peculiarities of their accounting and taxation; a systematic approach to awareness of the importance of social partnership for the socio-economic development of Ukraine through the use of methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison of economic indicators; using the positive experience of a number of construction enterprises to improve accounting and taxation for the entire construction industry.Results. The essence and state of social partnership in the enterprises of the construction industry are disclosed. The essence of the concepts of "social finance", "financial resources" and "financial resources of enterprises" is clarified. The problems of synthetic and analytical accounting, reporting and taxation of employee benefits (including voluntary payments) are identified. A number of accounting conducts on accrual of non-targeted and targeted assistance, assistance for recovery and burial, return and irrevocable financial assistance, repayment of loans, severance payments, etc. are presented. A number of proposals of scientists and practitioners have been supported and developed. They are "Regulations on the reception, accounting and use of charitable contributions and donations from individuals and legal entities" in health care institutions with the relevant sections; structure of the working plan of accounts of enterprises of the construction industry in terms of synthetic account 66 "Payments for payments to employees" and modifications of the "Settlement and payment information of the employee"; displaying information on ifrs employee benefits in the new section "Employee Benefits" form No. 5 "Notes to the annual financial statements" for 6 indicators: targeted and non-targeted provision, financial and severance assistance, burial allowance, additional benefits, etc.Prospects. Further scientific research should be directed to improving the quality and efficiency of accounting and taxation of transactions related to increasing the social responsibility of business. This is an important condition for strengthening its competitive advantages and promoting sustainable economic development.
The proposed article examines the process of transformation of UkrainianPolish bilateral good neighborly relations to the level of strategic partnership, which took place in the late 90s of the twentieth century. In official international practice and scientific literature, 1997 is considered to be the milestone from which the strategic partnership in modern Ukrainian-Polish relations is counted. The Republic of Poland and Ukraine jointly developed and tested mechanisms for the implementation and coordination of their strategic interests in the field of regional security, foreign policy, bilateral cooperation, and military cooperation. The political will of the leaders of both countries and the political establishment found expression in the formation of a strategic partnership, which is equally important for both Ukraine and Poland. The strategic partnership of the two countries at the beginning of the XXI century is constantly strengthened by cooperation within the existing interstate mechanisms and relies on a coherent regulatory framework, acting as a major driver of development and deepening of bilateral cooperation not only in politics but also in economics, cross-border and humanitarian cooperation. It is clear that the deepening of the Ukrainian-Polish strategic partnership in the future will depend on a number of factors and will be implemented in the context of serious geopolitical changes in Central and Eastern Europe. Therefore, at the present stage, the issue of formation and implementation of new strategic tasks is on the agenda of Ukraine and the Republic of Poland, based on the analysis of the political situation, economic realities, and so on. Despite some problems in the field of historical memory, the existing partnership between the two countries is mutually beneficial and has significant prospects.
The article summarizes the implementation of public-private partnership (PPP) both in Ukraine and in the energy sector, as well as its impact on improving the efficiency of its development. It also contains the modern approaches of scientists to the PPP implementation, its disadvantages, problems and the ways to solve them analysed. The author has grounded that the elimination of causes for slowing down the implementation of PPP would facilitate the rise of the energy performance in the state economy. The main purpose of the article is to study the real state of PPP in the energy sector of Ukraine and to develop proposals for improving this activity. The object of the study is separate subsectors of energy (nuclear energy, renewable energy, energy service), in which PPP concession projects were implemented. The study period was 2000-2018. Aiming to verify the hypothesis of the study, there were used the methods of comparison and analysis of established legal provisions of PPP and the existing real practice both generally in Ukraine and in some regions. It is established that in Ukraine the PPP mechanism, despite the adoption of a significant number of regulations and the development of relevant projects in the energy sector is almost non-existent, there are only some achievements in this area. The results proved that raising the efficiency of the energy sector largely depends on the level of PPP implementation. The necessity of adopting the Concept of strategic development of PPP in Ukraine, including in energy, elimination of contradictions between general and special legislation in energy sector, normative-legal, institutional support of such partnership, increase of level of financial aid and financial guarantees to private sector,preparation of personnel potential for realization of relevant projects is also substantiated. ; У статті узагальнено реалізацію державно-приватного партнерства (ДПП) в Україні та енергетичній галузі, його вплив на підняття ефективності її розвитку. До основних позитивних результатів реалізації концесійних проектів, які є основною формою реалізації ДПП, віднесено залучення приватного капіталу до інвестування в різні галузі економіки, охорони здоров'я, освіти, науки та культури, об'єднання державного та приватного майна, підприємницького досвіду, фінансових, кадрових ресурсів, забезпечення більшої зайнятості населення. Проаналізовано сучасні підходи науковців щодо впровадження ДПП,його недоліків, проблем та шляхів їх вирішення. Автор обґрунтував, що усунення підстав сповільнення впровадження ДПП буде сприяти підйому енергетичних показників в економіці держави. Основна мета статті - здійснити дослідження реального стану ДПП в енергетичній сфері України, розроблення пропозицій з удосконалення зазначеної діяльності. Об'єктом дослідження було вибрано окремі підгалузі енергетики (ядерна енергетика, відновлювана енергетика, енергосервіс), в яких реалізовувались концесійні проекти ДПП. Період дослідження становив 2000-2018 роки. З метою перевірки гіпотези дослідження застосовувались методи порівняння та аналізу встановлених законодавчих положень з ДПП та наявної реальної практики як загалом в Україні, так і в деяких регіонах. Встановлено, що в Україні механізм ДПП, незважаючи на прийняття значної кількості нормативно-правових актів та розроблення відповідних проектів в енергетиці, майже не працює, наявні лише окремі досягнення в цій галузі. Отримані результати довели, що підняття ефективності енергетичної галузі в значній мірі залежить від рівня впровадження ДПП. Обгрунтовано необхідність прийняття Концепції стратегічного розвитку ДПП в Україні, в тому числі в енергетиці, усунення суперечностей між загальним та спеціальним законодавством в енергетичній галузі, нормативно-правове, інституцій-не забезпечення такого партнерства, підвищення рівня фінансової допомоги та фінансових гарантій приватному сектору, підготовки кадрового потенціалу для реалізації відповідних концесійних проектів.
The subject of the research is the methodological and practical aspects of using life cycle contracts as part of a public–private partnership in Ukraine. The purpose of writing this article is to determine the possibilities of applying life cycle contracts within the framework of a public–private partnership for the development of production infrastructure. The methodology of the work – a systematic and institutional analysis (to justify the economic nature of life cycle contracts); scenario modeling (to determine the advantages and disadvantages of KCC for the state and business) of economic analysis (when making comparisons of KCC with government purchases). Results of work – a comparative analysis of life–cycle contracts and government procurement was carried out, which made it possible to determine the pros and cons of life–cycle contracts for its participants. An analysis of the risks and benefits of the use of life cycle contracts for the state and business has been made, and recommendations have been made on their use in Ukraine. Conclusions – over the past decade, life cycle contracts have become a very popular form of interaction between the public and private sectors in developed countries. Foreign experience shows that the use of life cycle contracts is most justified in infrastructure industries. This practice is related to the fact that the life cycle of infrastructure facilities in a harmonious manner meets the interests of the parties to life cycle contracts in terms of financing terms, payback, creation and operation of facilities.
The scientific article is devoted to the study of the concept of public-private partnership, establishing the proportionality of risks and benefits of public-private partnership, the feasibility of using this type of cooperation and the objectivity of unsuccessful examples, as evidence of the inexpediency of using public-private partnership. The author examines the historical aspect of the origin and emergence of public-private partnership. The concept of public-private partnership is considered through the prism of national and international law. Analyzing the modern literature on the classification of public-private partnership, its types are distinguished according to different criteria of classification: by subject composition (unilateral, multilateral); by level of origin and implementation (local-state, national, international); by type (concession, corporate, contractual). It is emphasized that the separation of the three types of public-private partnership is appropriate, because, although each of the types will be based on the contract, but the legal relationship that will arise for each type will be different, although they will have some common features. With regard to the regulation of public-private partnerships at the legislative level, it is argued that each state, at its discretion, can adopt legislation that will fully or partially regulate relations related to public-private partnerships. Such acts may be not only laws that fully regulate public relations related to public-private partnership, but also other acts that improve the legislation or regulate public relations related to concession agreements. However, it is noted that there is currently a lack of international legal framework. The current situation requires improvement and unification of the legislation governing public-private partnerships in different countries. It is justified that public-private partnership should be used in the case when the public site is more profitable than the use of alternatives. It is argued that with the help of public-private partnerships, if used properly, everyone can benefit: the State, the private partner, and the public, who will be able to use the public facility in the future. However, the benefit is possible only with correct calculation. ; Наукова стаття присвячена дослідженню поняття «державно-приватне партнерство», встановленню пропорційності ризиків та вигоди у державно-приватному партнерстві, доцільності використання даного типу співпраці й об'єктивності невдалих прикладів як свідчення про недоцільність використання державно-приватного партнерства. Автором досліджується історичний аспект зародження та виникнення державно-приватного партнерства. Розглядається поняття державно-приватного партнерства крізь призму національного та міжнародного законодавства. У результаті проведеного аналізу сучасної літератури щодо класифікації державно-приватного партнерства виокремлено його види за різними критеріями класифікації: за суб'єктним складом (одностороннє, багатостороннє); за рівнем виникнення та виконання (локально-державне, загальнодержавне, міжнародне); за типом (концесійне, корпоративне, договірне). Наголошується, що виокремлення трьох типів державно-приватного партнерства доцільне, адже, хоча і кожен із типів буде ґрунтуватися на договорі, однак правовідносини, що виникатимуть у кожному типі, будуть відрізнятись, хоч і матимуть деякі спільні риси. Щодо регулювання державно-приватного партнерства на законодавчому рівні аргументується, що кожна держава на власний розсуд може ухвалити законодавчі акти, які будуть цілком або частково регулювати відносини, що пов'язані з державно-приватним партнерством. Такими актами можуть бути не тільки закони, які регулюють суспільні відносини пов'язані з державно-приватним партнерством, а й інші акти, які вдосконалюють законодавство або регулюють суспільні відносини, пов'язані з концесійними угодами. Також зазначено, що нині бракує міжнародної правової бази. Теперішня ситуація вимагає вдосконалення й уніфікації законодавства, що регулює державно-приватне партнерство в різних країнах. Обґрунтовано, що державно-приватне партнерство доцільно використовувати тоді, коли публічній стороні таке партнерство є вигіднішим, аніж використання альтернатив. Стверджується, що за допомогою державно-приватного партнерства, за правильного застосування, вигоду можуть отримати всі: і держава, і приватний партнер, і населення, яке в подальшому матиме змогу користуватись публічним об'єктом. Однак отримання вигоди можливе лише за умови правильного розрахунку.
The article examines the role of partnerships in the development of regional infrastructure. The existing experience and prospects of improving the effectiveness of public-private partnership in the sphere of transport infrastructure development are studied. The forms of PPP in the sphere of transport infrastructure are analyzed. A number of strategic objectives of the development of road infrastructure are determined. The advantages of individual models of public-private partnership in the implementation of road infrastructure projects in the region are considered. In particular, we have investigated the projects based on "life cycle", which, as a rule, are built according to DBFO model ("design – building – finance – operation"), the projects according to DBB model ("design – bidding – building"). It is determined that in modern conditions DBFO model ("design – building – finance – operation") with the assistance of private funding, which is currently the most widely used kind of concession, is important and promising model for creating state objects of free transport infrastructure. The comparative analysis of the implementation of projects under traditional scheme and in PPP format is made.Separately the features of public-private partnership in the sphere of transport services and in the sphere of road construction are determined. It is noted that PPP model in the sector of road construction allows both to improve the legislation and standards of public-private partnership in transport sector and to actively involve public organizations for projects service and the improvement of mechanisms of management by transport infrastructure. ; У статті розглянуто роль партнерських відносин у забезпеченні розвитку інфраструктури регіону. Вивчено наявний досвід та перспективи підвищення ефективності державно-приватного партнерства у сфері розвитку транспортної інфраструктури. Проаналізовано форми ДПП у сфері транспортної інфраструктури. Визначено ряд стратегічних завдань розвитку безпосередньо автодорожньої інфраструктури. Розглянуто переваги окремих моделей державно-приватного партнерства у реалізації проектів автодорожньої інфраструктури регіону. Зокрема, досліджено проекти на основі «життєвого циклу», які, як правило, побудовані за моделлю DBFO («проектування – будівництво – фінансування – експлуатація»), проекти за моделлю DBB («проектування – конкурс – будівництво»). Визначено, що в сучасних умовах актуальною і перспективною моделлю для створення держав- них об'єктів безкоштовної транспортної інфраструктури є модель DBFO («проектування – будівництво – фінансування – експлуатація») із залученням приватного фінансування, що нині є найбільш широко застосовуваним різновидом концесії. Здійснено порівняльний аналіз реалізації проектів за традиційною схемою та у форматі ДПП.Окремо визначено особливості застосування державно-приватного партнерства в сфері транспортних послуг та у сфері будівництва доріг. Відзначено, що наведена модель ДПП у сфері будівництва доріг дозволяє як удосконалювати законодавство і стандарти державно-приватного партнерства у транспортній сфері, так і активно залучати громадські організації до обслуговування проектів та вдосконалення механізмів управління транспортною інфраструктурою.
