The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 724-726
ISSN: 0020-577X
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 724-726
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 275-286
ISSN: 0020-577X
Fragile or failed states are often caused by long lasting and violent conflicts - Liberia is one of them. Since the war ceased in 2003, the United Nations and its coalition of states have tried to rebuild the nation and maintain its peace. Nation building can be seen from two different angles: as a Weberian legal and rational order or as a process that highlights social and contextual factors. Within social sciences this process can be studied either by looking into what factors contribute to a successful nation building or how this process works in practice. The article focuses on the former, by listing and analyzing the involved UN institutions with an emphasis on the Peacebuilding Commission and Peacebuilding Fund. L. Pitkaniemi
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 60, Heft 4, S. 461-464
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: NUPI Rapport, Nr. 118
World Affairs Online
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 72, Heft 1, S. 91-101
ISSN: 0020-577X
Modern international law contains certain elements that are of fundamental importance for international law system. Some examples of this are the territorial sovereignty, their political independence and their formal equality - elements that all law is based on, and which is of such importance that if they imagined away, said falling international law as a system completely. International law Regier on the use of military force, which is the topic of this contribution, is another example. Effective restrictions on states' use of military force against other states is of crucial importance for the law's other key elements is to have any reality. Without such restrictions, no real sovereignty and independence, no real rule of peaceful settlement of disputes, and further said. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 72, Heft 4
ISSN: 0020-577X
When this issue of International Politics published it gone for just a week ago the Nobel Peace Prize for 2014 was awarded to Oslo. This year parts Indian Kailash Satyarthi and Pakistani Malala Yousafzay price for its fight against the oppression of children and adolescents and for children's right to education. 'Children must go to school, not exploited for economic purposes,' writes Nobel Committee in its grounds, and continues: 'In the poor countries is 60 percent of the population currently under 25 years. It is a prerequisite for a peaceful development globally that children and young people's rights are respected. Especially in conflict areas helps child molestation that conflicts are passed on through generations. '. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 465-483
ISSN: 0020-577X
A large contrast between European Union and the United States still exists when it comes to how the countries influence the world. Whereas the United States is still obsessed with military might, Europe's focus is on economic, cultural and legitimate influence. In the early 20th century it would have been almost impossible to imagine millions of peaceful Europeans demonstrate against a foreign war, but in the early 21st century it is commonplace. Many authors have argued that this change was caused by developments in weapon technology, democratization of the continent, and realization that war is primitive. A theory developed by James Sheehan argues that wars ended due to developmental historic conditions. For example, democracy allows both the war mobilization of the whole population, but it also gives them the opportunity to vote for peace. L. Pitkaniemi
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 35-64
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 2, S. 289-300
ISSN: 0020-577X
An analysis on NUPI's report Norwegian Self-Images and Norwegian Foreign Policy that focuses on what Norwegian foreign policy is and what it should be. Traditionally Norway is known for being a peaceful nation that supports the UN and works internationally as a part of NATO. Norway has two sets of foreign policy self-images: on one hand Norway has noble world improving goals and on the other hand Norway has strong arctic interests and a protectionist agricultural policy. Despite its relative stability, Norwegian foreign policy is significantly being shaped by globalization that affects both its dependence and its space of action. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 2, S. 285-288
ISSN: 0020-577X
Asks whether it is a sound strategy to underline the transparency, predictability and openness of the Norwegian foreign policy when the people are unsure of what this foreign policy should look like. In the early 21st century this foreign policy has become paradoxical when Norway at the same time portrays itself as peaceful nation, while taking part in the Afghan and Iraq wars. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 71-84
ISSN: 0020-577X
A national interest, as an expression, fits poorly in the Norwegian language and the country's political culture. Norwegian politicians rarely mention it and internationally the country is isolationist due to its small size, distant location and historical circumstances. However, in the northern European context, Norway has strong resource and environmental political interests, as well as keeping a stable and peaceful relationship with its neighbor Russia. L. Pitkaniemi