T he phenomenon of the performance audit could be assessed as a response to new developments in economy and the new management and governance models stimulating to seek a further improvement in the governance and enhancement of the accountability and responsibility of different levels of government. The findings and results of the insights formulated within the research lead to the conclusion that performance audit is representative of the modern version of audit and constitutes a challenge to the conventional administration, imposing a requirement for new knowledge and its innovative application. Performance audit may be perceived as a source of a timely, reliable and objective information on the management and performance processes showing the status of management and shaping the decision-making process.
T he phenomenon of the performance audit could be assessed as a response to new developments in economy and the new management and governance models stimulating to seek a further improvement in the governance and enhancement of the accountability and responsibility of different levels of government. The findings and results of the insights formulated within the research lead to the conclusion that performance audit is representative of the modern version of audit and constitutes a challenge to the conventional administration, imposing a requirement for new knowledge and its innovative application. Performance audit may be perceived as a source of a timely, reliable and objective information on the management and performance processes showing the status of management and shaping the decision-making process.
T he phenomenon of the performance audit could be assessed as a response to new developments in economy and the new management and governance models stimulating to seek a further improvement in the governance and enhancement of the accountability and responsibility of different levels of government. The findings and results of the insights formulated within the research lead to the conclusion that performance audit is representative of the modern version of audit and constitutes a challenge to the conventional administration, imposing a requirement for new knowledge and its innovative application. Performance audit may be perceived as a source of a timely, reliable and objective information on the management and performance processes showing the status of management and shaping the decision-making process.
T he phenomenon of the performance audit could be assessed as a response to new developments in economy and the new management and governance models stimulating to seek a further improvement in the governance and enhancement of the accountability and responsibility of different levels of government. The findings and results of the insights formulated within the research lead to the conclusion that performance audit is representative of the modern version of audit and constitutes a challenge to the conventional administration, imposing a requirement for new knowledge and its innovative application. Performance audit may be perceived as a source of a timely, reliable and objective information on the management and performance processes showing the status of management and shaping the decision-making process.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self –efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self–efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self –efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self–efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self–efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self –efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self –efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
Cohesion, team trust, stress, perceived Self and collective efficacy are considered to be significant factors of military teams performance efficacy. Still it is not clear, what the interaction between these factors are and in what way they predict performance efficacy. For the purpose of the study three questionnaires were developed: Perceived Military Stress, Perceived Military Self–efficacy and Perceived Military Collective Efficacy questionnaires, two scales of other authors were adapted to Lithuanian military population. 160 soldiers of Lithuanian professional military, belonging to 28 military teams (sections) took part in the research. It was estimated that cohesion, team trust, perceived Self and Collective efficacy are related to performance efficacy. Path model proves, that perceived collective efficacy is the most important variable predicting military team's performance efficacy and stress. Team's performance efficacy can also be predicted by cohesion, team trust and perceived Self - efficacy, but these factors predict performance efficacy not directly, but through perceived collective efficacy. Besides, higher levels of perceived Self and collective efficacy characterize person with international operation experience. Privates tend to experience higher levels of stress and to trust their teams less to compare to junior privates. Commanders of the section and their subjects evaluate their teams similar.
At the turn of the 20th century, three notions of the virtual can be distinguished in the humanitarian thought: technological, social, and performative. Application of G. Simondon's theoretical concepts of ontogenesis to E. Fischer-Lichte's concepts of mediality, aesthetics, and materiality of the performance – marks a conceptual theoretical shift from the performatively established unity of the aesthetical, political and social aspects of the performative as their temporal synthesis, towards the establishment of the procedurally acquired aesthetical, political and social performative reality as the dynamic relations of participation between vital and non-vital individuals performing on both sides of the screen. Contemporary processes of performance virtualization and the emergence of a perceived episteme of the perceiver's inclusion, required the revsision of the S.C. Peirce's semiotic definition of the virtual. Hence, it is complemented with the notion of mixed performative, which still depends on the perceiver's corporality, however, transcends the boundaries of "pure" physicality and can be interpreted as follows: A virtual X (where X is multiple, temporally related generic nouns) is something other than X (which has a different impact (virtus) upon X) and depends directly on the temporal involvement of a perceiver experiencing virtual X in the process of its semiosis. This formula of the virtual can also be considered as a definition of the virtual in contemporary performance art, which can be applied by "inserting" variables of the structural elements of performativity (cf. Fischer–Lichte) extended by the concepts of G. Simondon's philosophy in the instrumentation of the contemporary performative (taking into consideration that the definition of these elements varies in every even being performed, depending on its different strategies). Such a formula of the virtual – allows to assess the historical spectrum of performativity-virtuality connections and notions of the virtual when it manifests itself in (differently) live or mediated performances and establishes the virtual as an integral element of the performative. Virtuality in contemporary performance art is considered to be the virtual perceived on its ontological level.
At the turn of the 20th century, three notions of the virtual can be distinguished in the humanitarian thought: technological, social, and performative. Application of G. Simondon's theoretical concepts of ontogenesis to E. Fischer-Lichte's concepts of mediality, aesthetics, and materiality of the performance – marks a conceptual theoretical shift from the performatively established unity of the aesthetical, political and social aspects of the performative as their temporal synthesis, towards the establishment of the procedurally acquired aesthetical, political and social performative reality as the dynamic relations of participation between vital and non-vital individuals performing on both sides of the screen. Contemporary processes of performance virtualization and the emergence of a perceived episteme of the perceiver's inclusion, required the revsision of the S.C. Peirce's semiotic definition of the virtual. Hence, it is complemented with the notion of mixed performative, which still depends on the perceiver's corporality, however, transcends the boundaries of "pure" physicality and can be interpreted as follows: A virtual X (where X is multiple, temporally related generic nouns) is something other than X (which has a different impact (virtus) upon X) and depends directly on the temporal involvement of a perceiver experiencing virtual X in the process of its semiosis. This formula of the virtual can also be considered as a definition of the virtual in contemporary performance art, which can be applied by "inserting" variables of the structural elements of performativity (cf. Fischer–Lichte) extended by the concepts of G. Simondon's philosophy in the instrumentation of the contemporary performative (taking into consideration that the definition of these elements varies in every even being performed, depending on its different strategies). Such a formula of the virtual – allows to assess the historical spectrum of performativity-virtuality connections and notions of the virtual when it manifests itself in (differently) live or mediated performances and establishes the virtual as an integral element of the performative. Virtuality in contemporary performance art is considered to be the virtual perceived on its ontological level.
At the turn of the 20th century, three notions of the virtual can be distinguished in the humanitarian thought: technological, social, and performative. Application of G. Simondon's theoretical concepts of ontogenesis to E. Fischer-Lichte's concepts of mediality, aesthetics, and materiality of the performance – marks a conceptual theoretical shift from the performatively established unity of the aesthetical, political and social aspects of the performative as their temporal synthesis, towards the establishment of the procedurally acquired aesthetical, political and social performative reality as the dynamic relations of participation between vital and non-vital individuals performing on both sides of the screen. Contemporary processes of performance virtualization and the emergence of a perceived episteme of the perceiver's inclusion, required the revsision of the S.C. Peirce's semiotic definition of the virtual. Hence, it is complemented with the notion of mixed performative, which still depends on the perceiver's corporality, however, transcends the boundaries of "pure" physicality and can be interpreted as follows: A virtual X (where X is multiple, temporally related generic nouns) is something other than X (which has a different impact (virtus) upon X) and depends directly on the temporal involvement of a perceiver experiencing virtual X in the process of its semiosis. This formula of the virtual can also be considered as a definition of the virtual in contemporary performance art, which can be applied by "inserting" variables of the structural elements of performativity (cf. Fischer–Lichte) extended by the concepts of G. Simondon's philosophy in the instrumentation of the contemporary performative (taking into consideration that the definition of these elements varies in every even being performed, depending on its different strategies). Such a formula of the virtual – allows to assess the historical spectrum of performativity-virtuality connections and notions of the virtual when it manifests itself in ...
