Prejudice against and discrimination of asylum seekers: their antecedents and consequences in a longitudinal field study
Prejudice towards and discrimination of migrants are serious problems in our modern, globalised world. In the present doctoral thesis it was studied how negative attitudes of citizens towards asylum seekers relate to contact experiences, feelings of threat and acculturation orientations. A longitudinal field study with two measurement points was conducted with the German inhabitants (N = 70) of a neighbourhood where an asylum seekers refuge was soon to be opened. Directly before and six months after the opening of the refuge the attitudes (i.e., prejudice, negative emotions and discrimination intentions) of the locals towards the asylum seekers (and their contact experiences) were assessed with questionnaires. Several theoretical backgrounds were used for this study. First, drawing on theories from contact research, effects of three different kinds of contact were hypothesised. Improvements of attitudes towards migrants through mere contact (mere presence of the newcomers), personal contact (own contact experiences) and extended contact (knowledge of neighbours' contact experiences) were analysed and compared. Secondly, perceptions of realistic and symbolic intergroup threat were related to outgroup attitudes. While some theories take stable personality traits (such as Authoritarianism or prejudice) as causal predictors of threat perceptions, other theories, such as the Integrated Threat Model, take threat perceptions as causal antecedents of prejudice.