Philosophy in Germany
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 89, S. 27-39
ISSN: 0300-211X
16105 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 89, S. 27-39
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 2, Heft 2-3, S. 166-182
ISSN: 0891-3811
An attempt to explore some of the principal ways in which postmodern philosophy differs from traditional, modern philosophy. In particular, it is shown how postmodern philosophy undermines, rejects, or deconstructs the central modern notions of "subjectivity" & "objective reality" -- as well as all the subsidiary notions connected with these. A particular effort is made to determine what consequences follow from this move. Does postmodernism necessarily entail relativism & nihilism, as some of its critics allege? An important contrast is drawn in this regard between hermeneutics & other forms of postmodern thought. AA
In: Politeia. Notizie di Politeia, Band 29, Heft 110, S. 22-41
ISSN: 1128-2401
In: The Oxford literary review: OLR ; critical analyses of literary, philosophical political and psychoanalytic theory, Band 28, S. 37-52
ISSN: 0305-1498
In: History of European ideas, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 584
ISSN: 0191-6599
In: The review of politics, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 700-705
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 602-603
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: The Salisbury review: a quarterly magazine of conservative thought, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 4-6
ISSN: 0265-4881
In: The new leader: a biweekly of news and opinion, Band 81, Heft 8, S. 12-13
ISSN: 0028-6044
In: Filozofski vestnik: FV, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 7-20
ISSN: 0353-4510
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 103, S. 6-11
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: Political studies, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 217-235
ISSN: 0032-3217
Many philosophers now reject the conception of philosophy & of the resulting connexion between philosophy & pol, on which most of classical pol'al philosophy rests. If the philosophical, sociol'al & ideological impulses of pol'al theory have grown weaker in recent yrs, this ought to mean - at least as far as the ideological impulse is concerned - that questions of pol'al org, of allocation of pol'al rights & powers, etc, are not at present felt to be morally critical. The argument against `ideological pol' has taken a number of lines, one of which is that ideologically-dominated thinking has no relevance to the controlling facts of contemporary soc structure & change. It follows that much recent British & American pol'al theory has been concerned with the devaluation of ideology & ideologies, with showing the importance of `technique' as opposed to ideology, or with showing that 'incrementalism' (Dahl & Lindblom) or `piecemeal engineering' (Popper) are the most rational methods of pol'al change. J. Schumpeter, in his CAPITALISM, SOCIALISM AND DEMOCRACY, & R. A. Dahl, in PREFACE TO DEMOCRATIC THEORY, follow the same anti-ideological trend. Their example shows that it is absurd to say that the energy or the rigor of pol'al theorizing have declined; on the contrary, it has acquired an analytical thoroughness & sharpness, a closeness in argument, that is pretty new. It does show, however, a narrowing of moral interests & expectations, a dismissal of wider notions of equality, freedom, participation, & a tendency to be most interested in the existing machinery of democratic systems, which proceed from a sci'fic & critical approach of the problem. IPSA.
In: Capitalism, nature, socialism: CNS ; a journal of socialist ecology, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 148-150
ISSN: 1045-5752
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 91, S. 30-32
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: The review of politics, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 472
ISSN: 0034-6705