Enighet eller pluralism? (Concensus or Pluralism?)
In: Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 311
ISSN: 0039-0747
23227 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 311
ISSN: 0039-0747
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 281-288
ISSN: 0192-5121
In: American political science review, Band 77, Heft 2, S. 368-383
ISSN: 1537-5943
This article is a critique of contemporary pluralist theory as found largely in the work of Robert A. Dahl and Charles E. Lindblom. Two different forms of pluralism are distinguished and compared critically with Marxist class analysis. Pluralism, it is argued, fails to account for the reality of political and economic inequality in the United States. As a theory, pluralism is also marked by increasing tension between the underlying values and the performance of American polyarchy. The overall result is that pluralism's utility as a description and explanation of the American political economy is called into serious doubt, and a case is made for the explanatory superiority of class analysis.
The liberal & communitarian perception of pluralism as an inevitable & desirable component of contemporary societies is explored. Pluralism is separated into three categories: cultural/national pluralism; moral/value pluralism; & pluralism based on certain structural differences (eg, race & ethnicity). An analysis of pluralism based on structural differences is performed to illustrate how such categories by themselves are inadequate foundations for models of identity. It is subsequently asserted that nationality & culture are not appropriate bases for creating identities. Consequently, a notion of pluralism based on the moral contention that the commitment to life is the seminal value of nonoppressive governments is advanced. Despite the possibility of competing moral values, it is concluded that the existence of moral truths, especially the commitment to life, must be accepted to ensure freedom. 19 References. J. W. Parker
The liberal & communitarian perception of pluralism as an inevitable & desirable component of contemporary societies is explored. Pluralism is separated into three categories: cultural/national pluralism; moral/value pluralism; & pluralism based on certain structural differences (eg, race & ethnicity). An analysis of pluralism based on structural differences is performed to illustrate how such categories by themselves are inadequate foundations for models of identity. It is subsequently asserted that nationality & culture are not appropriate bases for creating identities. Consequently, a notion of pluralism based on the moral contention that the commitment to life is the seminal value of nonoppressive governments is advanced. Despite the possibility of competing moral values, it is concluded that the existence of moral truths, especially the commitment to life, must be accepted to ensure freedom. 19 References. J. W. Parker
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 488-496
ISSN: 1741-2730
In: Political studies review, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 401
ISSN: 1478-9299
In: Journal of international political theory, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 95-102
ISSN: 1755-0882
In: Thesis eleven: critical theory and historical sociology, Heft 99, S. 127-131
ISSN: 0725-5136
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 122-125
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 122-125
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Band 44, Heft 6, S. 14
ISSN: 0031-3599