Suchergebnisse

Import zjawisk stanowiących zagrożenie dla bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego Unii Europejskiej w dość bolesny sposób odbija się na państwach członkowskich, powodując chaos naszczeblach decyzyjnych, co w konsekwencji osłabia całą UE. To z kolei wpływa na postrzeganie Unii Europejskiej jako słabej, nieradzącej sobie z problemami. Dlatego Autorka poddałaanalizie rolę polityki ekspedycyjnej w ramach WPBiO dla bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego i zewnętrznego UE. ; Import dangerous phenomena to the European Union causes a main threat to its internal security and in a very painful way affects for the Member States, causing chaos on the decisionmaking levels, which in turn weakens the whole of the EU. This in turn affects the perceptionof the European Union as weak, not deal with problems. Therefore, the author analyzed the role of policy expeditionary CSDP to internal and external security EU.

Import zjawisk stanowiących zagrożenie dla bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego Unii Europejskiej w dość bolesny sposób odbija się na państwach członkowskich, powodując chaos na szczeblach decyzyjnych, co w konsekwencji osłabia całą UE. To z kolei wpływa na postrzeganie Unii Europejskiej jako słabej, nieradzącej sobie z problemami. Dlatego Autorka poddała analizie rolę polityki ekspedycyjnej w ramach WPBiO dla bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego i zewnętrznego UE. ; Import dangerous phenomena to the European Union causes a main threat to its internal security and in a very painful way affects for the Member States, causing chaos on the decision-making levels, which in turn weakens the whole of the EU. This in turn affects the perception of the European Union as weak, not deal with problems. Therefore, the author analyzed the role of policy expeditionary CSDP to internal and external security EU.

The author briefly examines the European response to the changing security environment and the opportunities presented by the European Security and Defense Policy Expeditionary Force. As he correctly observes, the establishment of a European expeditionary force will be no easy matter, will require substantial investment, and will take years to complete. However, it is the right course for Europe to take. The European Union (EU) cannot manage emerging security issues using Cold War legacy forces because they are too ponderous to deploy. A lighter, more nimble expeditionary force is critical to EU policy. The author also points out that the United States must remain involved in the EU initiatives. Europe cannot go it alone and will need advice and perhaps even material support if it is to realize its ambitious agenda. ; https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1809/thumbnail.jpg

As the incumbent Turkish administration strives to pursue more aspiring goals in foreign affairs, Turkey's military policy is fast developing in line with this vision. The nation's defense technological and industrial base can now produce various conventional weaponry. Of these, without a doubt, Turkey's drone warfare assets have garnered the utmost attention among the international strategic community. In tandem, the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) have gradually gained an expeditionary posture with forward deployments across a broad axis, ranging from the Horn of Africa to the Gulf and the Mediterranean. Meanwhile, the military's doctrinal order of battle has been transforming to address the unfolding hybrid warfare challenges in Ankara's hinterland. Turkey's proxy warfare capabilities have also registered an uptrend in this respect. Nevertheless, Ankara will have to deal with certain limitations in key segments, particularly 5th generation aircraft and strategic weapon systems which, together, represent a severe intra-war deterrence gap in Turkey's defense posture. The Turkish administration will have to address this specific shortfall given the problematic threat landscape at the nation's Middle Eastern doorstep. This study covers two interrelated strategic topics regarding Turkey's national military capacity in the 21st century: its defense technological and industrial base (DTIB) and its military policy, both currently characterized by a burgeoning assertiveness.

As the UK's next general election looms closer, so too does the next Strategic Defence and Security Review. The last such review exercise in 2010 provoked extensive and widespread criticism - related to both its process and its outcomes. However, what was not called into question was the fundamental assumption on which the whole exercise rested: that the UK should maintain its full-spectrum expeditionary posture. James de Waal argues that, while the nuts and bolts of defence policy continue to be important, there is a much more significant, substantive debate to be had about the type of defence policy the UK should pursue. Adapted from the source document.

With the end of the Cold War, perceptions of the role of armed forces in the international environment changed dramatically and have led to a critical re-evaluation of defence budgets, defence bureaucracies and defence roles. The Changing Face of Military Power brings together some of the most eminent scholars in the field of defence studies to assess the changing dynamics of military power. It focuses in particular on the move towards joint service cooperation as a way of minimising costs and increasing efficiency.