How Motivation Influences Political Decision Making
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"How Motivation Influences Political Decision Making" published on by Oxford University Press.
1742232 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"How Motivation Influences Political Decision Making" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Motivated Reasoning and Political Decision Making" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Vis , B 2011 , ' Prospect theory and political decision-making ' , Political Studies Review , vol. 9 , no. 3 , pp. 334-343 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00238.x
Risk is a central feature of political decision making. Prospect theory, an empirically correct theory of choice under risk that deals precisely with this condition, therefore seems to have much to offer political science. Prospect theory's central finding is that individuals' attitude toward risk depends on whether they face losses or gains. Confronting gains, individuals are risk averse in their decision making; confronting losses, they are risk accepting. Where do these preferences come from? Do they also hold for collective decision making? How can prospect theory help us to solve puzzles in political science? This article addresses these questions by discussing some advances in evolutionary biology, behavioural economics, psychology, neuro-economics and political science. The article shows that there is increasing evidence that prospect theory preferences have an evolutionary origin and that these preferences extend to collective decision making. Moreover, it demonstrates that political science can indeed gain from applying prospect theory, as insights from prospect theory help to solve puzzles such as why some governments pursue electorally risky welfare state reform but others do not. © 2011 The Author. Political Studies Review © 2011 Political Studies Association.
BASE
In: Political studies review, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 334-343
ISSN: 1478-9302
Risk is a central feature of political decision making. Prospect theory, an empirically correct theory of choice under risk that deals precisely with this condition, therefore seems to have much to offer political science. Prospect theory's central finding is that individuals' attitude toward risk depends on whether they face losses or gains. Confronting gains, individuals are risk averse in their decision making; confronting losses, they are risk accepting. Where do these preferences come from? Do they also hold for collective decision making? How can prospect theory help us to solve puzzles in political science? This article addresses these questions by discussing some advances in evolutionary biology, behavioural economics, psychology, neuro-economics and political science. The article shows that there is increasing evidence that prospect theory preferences have an evolutionary origin and that these preferences extend to collective decision making. Moreover, it demonstrates that political science can indeed gain from applying prospect theory, as insights from prospect theory help to solve puzzles such as why some governments pursue electorally risky welfare state reform but others do not.
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 86
ISSN: 1467-9221
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 188-202
ISSN: 0031-2290
Little attention has been paid so far, in the current discussion re the use of PO polls in pol, to consideration of the limits placed on the polls by the nature of pol'al decision-making What polls can tell politicians, & what politicians want & need to know, are considered. It appears that the shortcomings, like the strength of polls, are probably no greater, though definitely diff from, those of other sources of pol'al intelligence. It is all the more tempting to reject the validity & utility of polls if the method produces findings which the individual dislikes on pol'al grounds. IPSA.
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 368-393
ISSN: 1085-794X
Economic rights can be instantiated in a variety of ways. This article investigates the problem associated with making economic rights into policy through one source: the political policymaker. By considering the policymaker's decision problem, we can identify particular decision flaws and possible corrective measures that might prompt economic rights instantiation through "enlightened self-interest." A complementary approach involves constitutionalizing economic rights as directive principles and enforceable law, which could work somewhat independently of the policymaker's preferences and/or beliefs. The final part of the article examines a sample of actual constitutions to determine whether government effort toward fulfilling economic rights is related with constitutionalization. The evidence considered here suggests a positive relationship: countries with better economic rights provisions in their constitutions demonstrate greater economic rights effort.
In: Research in micropolitics 6
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics
ISSN: 1460-2482
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Q Methodology in Research on Political Decision Making" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Voter Information Processing and Political Decision Making" published on by Oxford University Press.
Do the media matter for public policy making? Based on the literature on the conditionality of the effect of mass media attention on political attention and theories of public policy making, this article argues that it depends on prior political attention. If the media focus on a case related to an issue to which politicians already pay attention, and the media attention is sustained, this can initiate a political decision-making process that leads to public policy change. The article illustrates this logic using two Danish examples and discusses how this argument can be investigated more broadly.
BASE
In: Strategic analysis: a monthly journal of the IDSA, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 511-526
ISSN: 1754-0054
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 368-393
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Handbook of Decision Making; Public Administration and Public Policy, S. 347-360