Political Rights Review and Political Party Cohesion
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 213-229
ISSN: 1460-2482
118045 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 213-229
ISSN: 1460-2482
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics
ISSN: 0031-2290
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Band 69, Heft 2
ISSN: 0031-2290
In: A Freedom House Book + Freedom in the World 1981
World Affairs Online
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 72
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: International human rights 1
In: Human(ities) and rights: global network journal, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 164-207
ISSN: 2675-3707
The interactions between legal and political system has been strengthened in recent years, especially through judicial review, with the transference to Courts of themes that define and divide a political system. In brazilian case, in the absence of legislative deliberation some of these discussions are forwarded Brazilian courts, who gave controversial decisions about "mega politics". So, the research´s question "" is the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (re) building electoral legislation, as a manifestation of judicial activism, interfering in mega politics?The study starts from a theoretical approach, with the deductive method, combined with a qualitative case analysis about courts´s decisions regarding party loyalty, coalition verticalizations, threshold clauses and the rights of legislative minorities, and political donations. Therefore, the research is supported by a bibliographical and documentary survey. Based on the methodological approach of Judicial Politcs, the legal protection of fundamental political rights and the structure of the Brazilian strong judicial system are described (Normative Theory), and evaluated the motivations of legal decisions, taking into account judicialization as exercise of a political activity (Positive Theory).
In: ILLIBERAL LIBERAL STATES: IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND INTEGRATION IN THE EU, S. Carrera and E. Guild, eds., Ashgate, 2009
SSRN
In: Public administration: the journal of the Australian regional groups of the Royal Institute of Public Administration, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 21-21
ISSN: 1467-8500
In: Australian journal of public administration, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 362-375
ISSN: 1467-8500
Abstract: The article examines the history of legal restrictions on political activities by Victorian public employees from the introduction of responsible government in 1856. As in other Australian jurisdictions, the rules have gradually become less restrictive. Special aspects of the Victorian experience examined include: (a) the short lived experiment of not excluding permanent officials from membership of Parliament; (b) the creation of separate parliamentary constituencies for public employees in 1903; (c) the attempt to devise safeguards against political pressure by public employees after separate representation was abandoned; (d) special restrictions on the police, including disenfranchisement from 1854 to 1888 and the ban on participating in elections otherwise than by voting.
In: Polity, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 72-95
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: Political Empowerment of Women, S. 87-118
In: Journal of ethnic and migration studies: JEMS, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 131-145
ISSN: 1469-9451
In: Journal of contemporary history, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 395-412
ISSN: 1461-7250
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 236-247
ISSN: 2457-0222