Suchergebnisse

[8], 116, [2] p. ; Dedication signed: Christopher Leuer. ; The first leaf is blank except for signature-mark "A". ; With a final errata leaf. ; Heading to dedication in seven lines. Variant: heading in eight lines. ; Reproduction of the original the Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.). Library.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

[2], 24 p. ; Relates to the administration of Governor Leisler. ; Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

"Animadversions . upon some passages of a book, entituled, A political epitomy, concerning the power of sovereigns in ecclesiastical affairs. Written by Adrian Houtuyn": p. 156-182. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; "The introductory epistle" signed: J. Crull, M.D.

[6], 42 p. ; Reproduction of original in the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus). Library.

[2], 14, 17-35, [1] p. ; A reply to: L'Estrange, Sir Roger. Citt and Bumpkin. ; Place of publication from Wing. ; A reissue, with a cancel title page, of: A dialogue by Tom and Dick, over a dish of coffee, concerning matters of religion and government.

De bagni et essercitii antichi de greci et de romani. ; Discorso sopra la castramentatione, et disciplina militare de romani / composto per il S. Guglielmo Choul . ; con i bagni, & essercitij antichi de greci, & romani ; et tradotto on lingua toscana per M. Gabriel Symeoni, con portada, paginación y signatura propias. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Fecha entre paréntesis tomada de la portada del t. 2. ; Existe otra emisión con distinta portada y fecha de 1559. ; La h. pleg. es esquema tipográfico con grabados xilográficos. ; Las il. son grabados xilográficos intercalados al texto: escenas de vida de romanos y griegos y monedas. ; Texto con apostillas marginales. ; Portada con orla tipográfica. ; Sign.: a-z4, A-H4 ; a-o4, A-E4, [flor]4.

De bagni et essercitii antichi de greci et de romani. ; Discorso sopra la castramentatione, et disciplina militare de romani / composto per il S. Guglielmo Choul . ; con i bagni, & essercitij antichi de greci, & romani ; et tradotto on lingua toscana per M. Gabriel Symeoni, con portada, paginación y signatura propias. ; CCBE S. XVI, ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Existe otra emisión con distinta portada y fecha de 1558. ; Las il. son grabados xilográficos intercalados al texto: escenas de vida de romanos y griegos y monedas. ; Texto con apostillas marginales. ; Portada con orla tipográfica. ; Sign.: a-z4, A-H4, *4 ; a-o4, A-E4, [flor]4.

[2], 38 p. ; A reply to Charles Blount's Appeal from the country to the city. Cf. Kitchen, G. Sir Roger L'Estrange, p. 255-256. ; A second part was published in the same year.

Fecha probable de imp. ; Enc. Holandesa ; Incipit: "Los autores que expresamente afirman son: Covarrubias, in IV Decret., 2 p., cap. 3, § 5; Ayala." (fol. 167r) ; Explicit: ". Volumus autem quod exemptio praefata non comprehendat ecclesias neque personas in eis quae ad animarum curam pertinent in quibus Decreta Concilii Tridentini omnino servari debeant. [Urbano VIII, Imperscrutabilis, § 20]" (fol. 168v)