POLITIKA, Jurnal Ilmu Politik (JIP), merupakan media komunikasi dan informasi bagipengembangan ilmu politik, baik politik lokal, nasional, regional, maupun internasional. POLITIKAditerbitkan untuk menjadi wahana pendorong perkembangan ilmu politik melalui dokumentasi hasilhasilpenelitian serta kajian kritis terhadap berbagai konsep baru, fenomena, dan peristiwa dalamkehidupan politik. POLITIKA secara berkala terbit dua kali setahun, yaitu pada bulan April –September dan Oktober – Februari. Redaksi menerima sumbangan artikel hasil penelitian, artikelkonseptual, dan artikel analisis (bukan penelitian) dari lingkungan perguruan tinggi dan kalanganumum. Artikel dapat ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia atau Bahasa Inggris. Pedoman penulisan artikeldapat dilihat pada halaman belakang.
artykuł w: Wschód Europy : studia humanistyczno-społeczne Vol. 6, Nr 1 (2020), s.173-193 ; Streszcz. ang., pol., ros. ; artykuł w: Wschód Europy : studia humanistyczno-społeczne Vol. 6, Nr 1 (2020), s.173-193 ; Streszcz. ang., pol., ros.
The selected articles introduce students with the concept and principals of the cultural policy. The course will provide analysis and assessment of the cultural policy of Lithuania and peculiarities of cultural policies of European countries. The practical part will introduce the regulatory framework of the Lithuania's cultural policy, analyse several typical cases of cultural heritage preservation and organisation and management of modern cultural processes.
The selected articles introduce students with the concept and principals of the cultural policy. The course will provide analysis and assessment of the cultural policy of Lithuania and peculiarities of cultural policies of European countries. The practical part will introduce the regulatory framework of the Lithuania's cultural policy, analyse several typical cases of cultural heritage preservation and organisation and management of modern cultural processes.
The selected articles introduce students with the concept and principals of the cultural policy. The course will provide analysis and assessment of the cultural policy of Lithuania and peculiarities of cultural policies of European countries. The practical part will introduce the regulatory framework of the Lithuania's cultural policy, analyse several typical cases of cultural heritage preservation and organisation and management of modern cultural processes.
Il-kliem "moralizzazzjoni tas-sistema politika" ta' pajjizna jista' ma jdoqqx nota ħelwa f'widnejn min il-kelma morali, tilfet kull sinifikat jew saret kelma antikwata z-zejjed għall-mentalita "avant guardista" tiegħu. Meta niddiskuti l-"moralizzazzjoni tas-sistema politika" mhux qed nagħmel xi priedka reliġjuza u lanqas ma nappella għall-valuri morali Nsara, imma għal prinċipji "universali'' jiġifieri dawk il-prinċipji li ,hu x'inhu t-twemmin poltiku jew reliġjuz tiegħek tasal biex taċċettahom bl-uzu elementari tar-raġuni. Naċċettaw jew ma naċċettawx Il-kelma speċifika "moralizzazzjoni", illum hawn ħafna nies f'pajjizna li jaccennaw għal din il-ħaġa aniki jekk ma jesprimuhiex f'daqshekk kliem. ; peer-reviewed
Investing is the conversion of available savings to a specific asset, usually shares, bonds, real estate or investment fund units, with a simple purpose of increasing the amount of money invested in the future. Investments have several types, which are divided according to certain features: according to the investor's influence on the entity, according to the investor's permanent residence, according to the investor status, according to the investment object. Investment policy is often defined institutional investors including, where everything is more or less regulated. State investment policy is formulated in the program of activities of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, taking into account economic and social-economic development forecasts of the Republic of Lithuania Investor's rights and protection, cooperation between the investor and the investment firms determine the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
Investing is the conversion of available savings to a specific asset, usually shares, bonds, real estate or investment fund units, with a simple purpose of increasing the amount of money invested in the future. Investments have several types, which are divided according to certain features: according to the investor's influence on the entity, according to the investor's permanent residence, according to the investor status, according to the investment object. Investment policy is often defined institutional investors including, where everything is more or less regulated. State investment policy is formulated in the program of activities of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, taking into account economic and social-economic development forecasts of the Republic of Lithuania Investor's rights and protection, cooperation between the investor and the investment firms determine the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
The article is based on an idea that there are four different modes of understanding reality – practice, science, art and mysticism. Political liberalism demands separation of public and private beliefs. However, mystical understanding of reality is not a system of propositions and beliefs. This is why one can speak of a conflict between liberalism and mystical understanding of reality. Political liberalism imposes a certain understanding of reality on believers. Liberals propose to remove religious convictions from public life and not to treat them as a basis of politics. They forget that mystics have the biggest trouble namely with convictions. To turn the reality of God into words for them is always the hardest task. Mystics find God before words, concepts and discourses. Liberals reduce religion to convictions and demand from mystics to comprehend that, which in their opinion is not comprehensible. There is a tension between liberalism and people who have mystical experiences. Liberals narrow down religious experience to convictions. However, mystical experience is a much broader subject. Behind it stands an understanding of world that has its own standards of reality.
The article is based on an idea that there are four different modes of understanding reality – practice, science, art and mysticism. Political liberalism demands separation of public and private beliefs. However, mystical understanding of reality is not a system of propositions and beliefs. This is why one can speak of a conflict between liberalism and mystical understanding of reality. Political liberalism imposes a certain understanding of reality on believers. Liberals propose to remove religious convictions from public life and not to treat them as a basis of politics. They forget that mystics have the biggest trouble namely with convictions. To turn the reality of God into words for them is always the hardest task. Mystics find God before words, concepts and discourses. Liberals reduce religion to convictions and demand from mystics to comprehend that, which in their opinion is not comprehensible. There is a tension between liberalism and people who have mystical experiences. Liberals narrow down religious experience to convictions. However, mystical experience is a much broader subject. Behind it stands an understanding of world that has its own standards of reality.
The article is based on an idea that there are four different modes of understanding reality – practice, science, art and mysticism. Political liberalism demands separation of public and private beliefs. However, mystical understanding of reality is not a system of propositions and beliefs. This is why one can speak of a conflict between liberalism and mystical understanding of reality. Political liberalism imposes a certain understanding of reality on believers. Liberals propose to remove religious convictions from public life and not to treat them as a basis of politics. They forget that mystics have the biggest trouble namely with convictions. To turn the reality of God into words for them is always the hardest task. Mystics find God before words, concepts and discourses. Liberals reduce religion to convictions and demand from mystics to comprehend that, which in their opinion is not comprehensible. There is a tension between liberalism and people who have mystical experiences. Liberals narrow down religious experience to convictions. However, mystical experience is a much broader subject. Behind it stands an understanding of world that has its own standards of reality.
The article is based on an idea that there are four different modes of understanding reality – practice, science, art and mysticism. Political liberalism demands separation of public and private beliefs. However, mystical understanding of reality is not a system of propositions and beliefs. This is why one can speak of a conflict between liberalism and mystical understanding of reality. Political liberalism imposes a certain understanding of reality on believers. Liberals propose to remove religious convictions from public life and not to treat them as a basis of politics. They forget that mystics have the biggest trouble namely with convictions. To turn the reality of God into words for them is always the hardest task. Mystics find God before words, concepts and discourses. Liberals reduce religion to convictions and demand from mystics to comprehend that, which in their opinion is not comprehensible. There is a tension between liberalism and people who have mystical experiences. Liberals narrow down religious experience to convictions. However, mystical experience is a much broader subject. Behind it stands an understanding of world that has its own standards of reality.
It-tkattir tax-xoghol produttiv, titjib fil-kundizzjonijiet ta' I-impieg, opportunitajiet indaqs ghall-haddiema kollha u djalogu rispettat bejn min jahdem u min ihaddem . dawn huma I-erba' principji Ii jiffurmaw ii-perm tal-politika socjali attwali ta' I-Unjoni Ewropea. L-importanza Ii nghatat lil dawn l- ghanijiet ma kenitx dejjem I-istess fi hdan I-Unjoni Ewropea. Huwa car Ii, ghall-bidu tieghu, il-Progett Ewropew kien intiz bhala progett strettament ekonomiku fejn I-element socjali kellu jsib postu wahdu jew sahansitra jibqa' lura ghax seta' jtellef mit-twettiq ta' suq hieles. Illum, I-istrategija dwar il-politika socjali fl-Unjoni Ewropea nbidlet. ; N/A
Status of the newspaper "Politika" in Karađorđevićs' Yugoslavia (1918-1941)The newspaper Politika was founded on 25 January 1904 by Vladislav F. Ribnikar. Since that time the Serbian Press market has begun to develop, and the Politika permanently has taken the important role up to this day. The newspaper witnessed important events in the Balkans in the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century but at the same time it was also under strong influence of Serbian centers of political authority. One example of such an influence was the status of the Politika in the period during the reign of Karađorđević dynasty in Yugoslavia, in 1918-1941. The newspaper then served a propaganda function for the royal court, particularly in 1929-1934. Then king Aleksander ruled in an authoritarian way and Politika played an important part in the country. The mechanism of functioning of the newspaper in the period of the royal authoritarianism, as well as in the remaining years of the interwar Yugoslavia was thus discussed in the article to help clarify the status of Politika under the rule of Karađorđevićs. Status gazety "Politika" w Jugosławii Karađorđeviciów (1918–1941)Gazeta pod nazwą "Politika" została założona 25 stycznia 1904 roku przez Vladislava F. Ribnikara. Od tego czasu zaczął kształtować się serbski rynek prasowy, w którym "Politika" trwale zajmuje istotne miejsce do dzisiejszego dnia. Gazeta była świadkiem ważnych i doniosłych wydarzeń na Bałkanach w XX wieku i na początku XXI wieku, ale zarazem znajdowała się również w strefie ścisłych wpływów politycznych serbskich ośrodków władzy. Jednym z przykładów takiego wpływu był status "Politiki" w okresie panowania dynastii Karađorđeviciów w Jugosławii w latach 1918–1941. Gazeta pełniła wtedy funkcję propagandową dworu królewskiego, co dało się szczególnie zauważyć w latach 1929–1934. Wtedy bowiem król Aleksander I sprawował autorytarne rządy w państwie, których ważną częścią stała się "Politika". Mechanizm funkcjonowania gazety zarówno w okresie autorytaryzmu królewskiego, jak i w pozostałych latach międzywojennej Jugosławii został więc poddany omówieniu, które umożliwiło wyjaśnienie statusu "Politiki" pod panowaniem Karađorđeviciów.
Lithuanian authors have challenges to study Russia's politics of history. The analysis is complicated because of a few factors. Diplomatic disputes and informative wars between Lithuania and Russia concerning historical questions have encouraged researches by historians but not by political scientists. In Lithuania, the questions of who and how is forming the history politics of Russia, what is its content and the function it accomplishes, remain unexamined. The analysis is further complicated by disagreement among Russian political scientists, historians, journalists, and politicians over the existence of such politics. The present analysis demonstrates that post-soviet Russia perceives the importance of historical memory, i.e. it understands that historical memory and its forms depend on the states' politics. Russia's political history genesis testifies that trends of such politics depend on the geopolitical orientation of its government. The end of the Cold War did not manage to conceal the fundamental differences between Europe and Russia. The wave of liberalism and democracy, which spread over Central and Eastern Europe as well as Russian Federation, has caused tension in Russia ruled by B. Yeltsin. Yeltsin's Russia was not able to tackle this problem by using measures of history politics in order to lessen the distance between Russia and the West. V. Putin undertook to find the solution to this situation, and he did. By using changes of international politics, he builds the image of Russia as a great power. Politics of history are subordinated to build this image; also, it is used as an instrument in domestic politics. The history politics of Russia has taken the shape of a manipulative form and serves the interests of V. Putins's power.
