Guinea: Poor Getting Poorer
In: Africa research bulletin. Economic, financial and technical series, Band 47, Heft 1
ISSN: 1467-6346
33839 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Africa research bulletin. Economic, financial and technical series, Band 47, Heft 1
ISSN: 1467-6346
In: Families in society: the journal of contemporary human services, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 239-240
ISSN: 1945-1350
In: The women's review of books, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 9
In: The family coordinator, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 195
In: Center for Migration Studies special issues, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 183-187
ISSN: 2050-411X
In: Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 109-121
ISSN: 1558-1489
In: Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, Band 19, Heft 4
ISSN: 1758-6100
In: Reason: free minds and free markets, Band 37, Heft 10, S. 32-39
ISSN: 0048-6906
In: African economic history, Heft 5, S. 88
ISSN: 2163-9108
In: African economic history, Heft 5, S. 86
ISSN: 2163-9108
In: African economic history, Heft 5, S. 90
ISSN: 2163-9108
In: WZB-Mitteilungen, Heft 134, S. 7-9
"Die soziale Ungleichheit in Deutschland nimmt zu, auch der Mittelstand befürchtet den Abstieg. Doch in den verschiedenen Einkommensschichten hat sich die Wahrscheinlichkeit zu verarmen über die letzten 25 Jahre sehr unterschiedlich entwickelt. Die Verarmungsquote stieg in den unteren Einkommensschichten von ca. 10 auf ca. 15 Prozent, während sie für die mittlere und die obere Einkommensschicht gleichmäßig niedrig geblieben ist." (Autorenreferat)
In: Journal of international development: the journal of the Development Studies Association, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 76-86
ISSN: 1099-1328
AbstractA libertarian movement that emphasises free markets to reduce poverty has grown strong in recent years. It views the poor as 'resilient and creative entrepreneurs and value‐conscious consumers'. This romanticised view of the poor is far from the truth and harms the poor in two ways. First, it results in too little emphasis on legal, regulatory and social mechanisms to protect the poor who are vulnerable consumers. Second, it results in overemphasis on microcredit and under‐emphasis on fostering modern enterprises that would provide employment opportunities for the poor. More importantly, the libertarian proposition grossly under‐emphasises the critical role and responsibility of the state for poverty reduction. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In: The Whitehead journal of diplomacy and international relations, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 57-70
ISSN: 1538-6589
I will argue that the view of the poor as "resilient and creative entrepreneurs and value-conscious consumers" has no empirical support. Romanticizing the poor not only does not help them, it actually harms them. First, it results in too little emphasis on legal, regulatory, and social mechanisms to protect the poor who are vulnerable consumers. Second, it results in overemphasis on micro-credit and under-emphasis on fostering modern enterprises that would provide employment opportunities for the poor. More importantly, the BOP proposition grossly under-emphasizes the critical role and responsibility of the state for poverty reduction. This is not to advocate a return to statist policies that stifled economic growth for decades in countries such as India and China. Contemporary economic history clearly demonstrates that the free market system is the best way to achieve overall growth and development, but that does not mean that there is no role for the state. Rajan and Zingales persuasively argue that "markets cannot flourish without the very visible hand of the governments."4 There is a need to impose some limits on free markets to prevent exploitation of the poor.5 Another vital role of the state is to provide basic services such as infrastructure, public health and education, responsibilities that are even more critical in the context of poverty reduction. Adapted from the source document.
In: Third world quarterly, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 144-146
ISSN: 1360-2241