Suchergebnisse

Öffentlicher Personenverkehr und Umweltschutz.

Medien- bzw. Fernsehkonsum im Bezug auf Europa und die EU.

Einstellung von Landwirten zur europäischen Agrarpolitik.

Themen: Vorteilhaftigkeit der europäischen Agrarpolitik für den
eigenen Betrieb; Bewertung der europäischen Agrarpolitik aus Sicht der
Agrarwirtschaft, der Konsumenten, der Umwelt und der
Nahrungsmittelindustrie; Schätzung des Anteils der
agrarwirtschaftlichen Ausgaben der EU am Gesamtetat; Bewertung des
Budgets als ausreichend; persönliche Vorteile durch die europäischen
Agrarsubventionen (erhaltene Zahlungen aufgrund der Bodenfläche oder
des Viehbestands, aufgrund der produzierten Mengen, zur Unterstützung
von Vermarktungsaktivitäten, für neue Gebäude oder Renovierung, für ein
Projekt der ländlichen Entwicklung oder der Forstwirtschaft, für einen
langfristigen Umweltschutzvertrag); Beurteilung der Schwierigkeiten bei
der Mittelbeantragung; gewünschte Ziele der EU-Agrarpolitik und
Bewertung der derzeitigen Durchsetzung entsprechender Maßnahmen:
Sicherung eines stabilen und angemessenen Einkommens für Bauern,
Förderung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der europäischen Landwirtschaft auf
dem Weltmarkt, Unterstützung der Bauern bei der Anpassung der Produkte
an Verbraucherwünsche, Unterstützung der Interessen der Bauern beim
Handel mit Zwischenhändlern oder Großhändlern, Verbesserung des
Landlebens, Reduzierung der Entwicklungsunterschiede zwischen Regionen,
Förderung der Sortimentserweiterung, Förderung des biologischen Anbaus,
Förderung des Umweltbewusstseins, Schutz des Geschmacks und der
Besonderheit europäischer Produkte, Schutz kleiner oder mittlerer
landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe, Sicherstellung einwandfreier
landwirtschaftlicher Produkte; Beurteilung der Entwicklung der
Agrarpolitik weg von Produktsubventionen hin zu Unterstützung und
Entwicklung der ländlichen Wirtschaft; Informiertheit über den
EU-Beitritt einiger Länder und die landwirtschaftlichen Aspekte davon;
Einschätzung der Auswirkung des Beitritts auf den eigenen Betrieb;
Informiertheit über die Diskussionen der Welthandelsorganisation in
Genf und die landwirtschaftlichen Aspekte davon; Einschätzung der
Auswirkung dieser Diskussionen auf die eigene Tätigkeit; ausreichende
Informationsversorgung über agrarwirtschaftliche Themen im eigenen
Land; persönliche Informationsbeschaffung über Fernsehen, Radio,
Tageszeitungen, Zeitschriften, landwirtschaftliche Presse, Internet,
spezielle Unterlagen wie Broschüren oder Prospekte, Berufsverbände oder
Gespräche; Wunsch nach mehr Informationen über die Marktordnung
einzelner Produkte oder die ländliche Entwicklung; Vertrauen in
verschiedene Institutionen bei der Meinungsbildung über die
EU-Agrarpolitik (Journalisten, Bauern, Experten, Regierung, europäische
Institutionen, Bauernverband, Verbraucher- und
Umweltschutzorganisationen, Familie und Freunde).

Demographie: Alter; hauptsächliche Produkte und Größe des
landwirtschaftlichen Betriebes; Anteil der landwirtschaftlichen
Tätigkeiten am Haushaltseinkommen; Selbsteinschätzung der Betriebsgröße
relativ zu den Betriebsgrößen in der Region.

Einstellung zum Wettbewerb zwischen Unternehmen und die Wettbewerbspolitik der Europäischen Union.

Wissen über die EU-Regionalpolitik. Meinung über die Strategien und Vorgehensweisen der EU-Regionalpolitik.

This project aims to advance knowledge in labour politics by focusing on the 'contentious politics of unemployment', i.e. the relationship between political-institutional approaches to employment policy and political conflicts mobilized by collective actors over unemployment in the public domain. It is designed to study this topic at national, international comparative, and transnational levels. Key objectives: (a) to generate new data for longitudinal and comparative analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships; (b) to study the potential for political participation 'from below' by citizens campaigning for the rights of the unemployed and the conditions under which existing organizational networks and policy dialogues transform in a more open civil policy deliberation; (c) to provide knowledge based on rigorous cross-national and EU-level transnational analyses allowing grounded empirical statements about the Europeanisation of the field.

As the contested and negotiated character of the employment policy field expresses itself both in the public domain and in the institutional arenas for interest mediation, we look both at political claim-making in the public space and policy deliberation within the polity. The overall design of the research has three main components: (a) mapping the field of political contention, i.e. structures of ideological cleavages and actor relationships, both longitudinally and cross-nationally; (b) examining the nature of the multi-organizational field extending from the core policy domain to the public domain, i.e. networks and channels of political influence between core policy actors and intermediary organizations, on one side, and civil society organizations and social movements representing the unemployed (including the unemployed themselves), on the other; (c) studying the nature of the interaction between EU-level and national policy-making by determining the channels of political influence that exist between European institutions and national policy domains in the field (the multi-level governance of employment policy), and examining to what extent there are new political opportunities for the bottom-up empowerment of citizens' organizations as a consequence of the emergence of the EU as an actor in the field. The body of data generated allows for longitudinal (1990-2002) and comparative (F, D, I, S, CH, UK) analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships in the unemployment issue-field. It is backed up by interviews conducted with key actors in the organizational field (policy actors, employers associations, trade unions, parties, NGOs and social movements) both at the national and transnational levels. Innovative attempts are made to establish networks and links between the involved actors as part of our dissemination strategy, which is key to the overall success of the project.

Beurteilung der EU-Regionalpolitik.

Objectives: This project aims to advance knowledge in labour politics by focusing on the 'contentious politics of unemployment', i.e. the relationship between political institutional approaches to employment policy and political conflicts mobilized by collective actors over unemployment in the public domain. It is designed to study this topic at national, international comparative, and transnational levels. Key objectives: (a) to generate new data for longitudinal and comparative analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships; (b) to study the potential for political participation 'from below' by citizens campaigning for the rights of the unemployed and the conditions under which existing organizational networks and policy dialogues transform in a more open civil policy deliberation; (c) to provide knowledge based on rigorous cross-national and EU-level transnational analyses allowing grounded empirical statements about the Europeanisation of the field. Description: As the contested and negotiated character of the employment policy field expresses itself both in the public domain and in the institutional arenas for interest mediation, we look both at political claim-making in the public space and policy deliberation within the polity. The overall design of the research has three main components: (a) mapping the field of political contention, i.e. structures of ideological cleavages and actor relationships, both longitudinally and cross-nationally; (b) examining the nature of the multi-organizational field extending from the core policy domain to the public domain, i.e. networks and channels of political influence between core policy actors and intermediary organizations, on one side, and civil society organizations and social movements representing the unemployed (including the unemployed themselves), on the other; (c) studying the nature of the interaction between EU-level and national policy-making by determining the channels of political influence that exist between European institutions and national policy domains in the field (the multi-level governance of employment policy), and examining to what extent there are new political opportunities for the bottom-up empowerment of citizens' organizations as a consequence of the emergence of the EU as an actor in the field. A new body of data will be generated which will allow for longitudinal (1990-2002) and comparative (F, D, I, S, CH, UK) analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships in the unemployment issue-field. This will be backed up by interviews conducted with key actors in the organizational field (policy actors, employers associations, trade unions, parties, NGOs and social movements) both at the national and transnational levels. Innovative attempts will be made to establish networks and links between the involved actors as part of our dissemination strategy, which is key to the overall success of the project. Expected results: The success of this project is underwritten by the European dimension. It will provide the first systematic cross-national comparison of the contentious politics of unemployment based on original data. It has a high potential for being a path-breaking academic study in labour politics, social movements and Europe. The findings will feedback understanding to the actors in the field, facilitated through our dissemination strategy which aims to contribute toward a constructive social dialogue.

The PERITIA survey is the first major cross-national survey of public trust in expertise used to inform policy making on climate change and COVID-19.

While the main focus is on trust in national governments and scientists, the survey also contains measures capturing trust in a wide range of policy actors, including the European Commission, scientists in public, private and HE settings, climate charities and NGOs, news, media and social media organisations, as well as advisory groups such as the World Health Organization and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The data were collected online in January 2022 as part of the EC-funded Policy Expertise and Trust (PERITIA) study in Germany, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Poland and the United Kingdom. In Armenia CATI (Computer Assistant Telephone Interview) was used to collect data in February-May 2022.

Politische und sozio-ökonomische Situation, Rolle des Staates,
politische Einstellungen und Wahlverhalten.

Themen: Größte Probleme des Landes; bevorzugter Aufenthaltsort;
Situation bezüglich Demokratie, Menschenrechte, Respekt vor der Arbeit,
Wohnen, Beschäftigung, Gesetzestreue, Bildung, Kultur, Kindererziehung,
Gesundheit und Einfluß auf Regierungsbeschlüsse; Glücksgefühl (Skala);
Regierungsausgaben für Umwelt, Gesundheit, Polizei, Bildung, Militär und
Verteidigung, Renten, Arbeitslosenunterstützung, Kultur und Kunst;
Zuständigkeit der Regierung für Beschäftigung, Preiskontrolle,
Gesundheitsversorgung, Lebensstandard; Unterstützung der Industrie und
Einkommensunterschiede; Verringerung der Einkommensunterschiede;
Zulänglichkeit der Einkommens; Zufriedenheit mit der Demokratie und der
Situation der eigenen Familie; Zustand der Gesellschaft; Vertrauen in
Institutionen; Erfolg der Arbeit von Parlament, Regierung,
Premierminister, Präsident und aller Ministerien; Nutzen der
Europäischen Union; Rating der politischen Parteien; Parteipräferenz
(Sonntagsfrage); Links-Rechts-Selbsteinstufung; Parteiverbundenheit;
letzte Wahlentscheidung; Einschätzung der Zeit vor 1990; Nationalität;
Religiosität; Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Religion; monatliches
Haushaltseinkommen; Besitz von Haushaltsgeräten, Auto und Haus; sozialen
Selbsteinstufung; Wohnort.

This project aims to advance knowledge in labour politics by focusing on the 'contentious politics of unemployment', i.e. the relationship between political-institutional approaches to employment policy and political conflicts mobilized by collective actors over unemployment in the public domain. It is designed to study this topic at national, international comparative, and transnational levels. Key objectives: (a) to generate new data for longitudinal and comparative analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships; (b) to study the potential for political participation 'from below' by citizens campaigning for the rights of the unemployed and the conditions under which existing organizational networks and policy dialogues transform in a more open civil policy deliberation; (c) to provide knowledge based on rigorous cross-national and EU-level transnational analyses allowing grounded empirical statements about the Europeanisation of the field.

As the contested and negotiated character of the employment policy field expresses itself both in the public domain and in the institutional arenas for interest mediation, we look both at political claim-making in the public space and policy deliberation within the polity. The overall design of the research has three main components: (a) mapping the field of political contention, i.e. structures of ideological cleavages and actor relationships, both longitudinally and cross-nationally; (b) examining the nature of the multi-organizational field extending from the core policy domain to the public domain, i.e. networks and channels of political influence between core policy actors and intermediary organizations, on one side, and civil society organizations and social movements representing the unemployed (including the unemployed themselves), on the other; (c) studying the nature of the interaction between EU-level and national policy-making by determining the channels of political influence that exist between European institutions and national policy domains in the field (the multi-level governance of employment policy), and examining to what extent there are new political opportunities for the bottom-up empowerment of citizens' organizations as a consequence of the emergence of the EU as an actor in the field. The body of data generated allows for longitudinal (1990-2002) and comparative (F, D, I, S, CH, UK) analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships in the unemployment issue-field. It is backed up by interviews conducted with key actors in the organizational field (policy actors, employers associations, trade unions, parties, NGOs and social movements) both at the national and transnational levels. Innovative attempts are made to establish networks and links between the involved actors as part of our dissemination strategy, which is key to the overall success of the project.

Objectives: This project aims to advance knowledge in labour politics by focusing on the 'contentious politics of unemployment', i.e. the relationship between political institutional approaches to employment policy and political conflicts mobilized by collective actors over unemployment in the public domain. It is designed to study this topic at national, international comparative, and transnational levels. Key objectives: (a) to generate new data for longitudinal and comparative analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships; (b) to study the potential for political participation 'from below' by citizens campaigning for the rights of the unemployed and the conditions under which existing organizational networks and policy dialogues transform in a more open civil policy deliberation; (c) to provide knowledge based on rigorous cross-national and EU-level transnational analyses allowing grounded empirical statements about the Europeanisation of the field. Description: As the contested and negotiated character of the employment policy field expresses itself both in the public domain and in the institutional arenas for interest mediation, we look both at political claim-making in the public space and policy deliberation within the polity. The overall design of the research has three main components: (a) mapping the field of political contention, i.e. structures of ideological cleavages and actor relationships, both longitudinally and cross-nationally; (b) examining the nature of the multi-organizational field extending from the core policy domain to the public domain, i.e. networks and channels of political influence between core policy actors and intermediary organizations, on one side, and civil society organizations and social movements representing the unemployed (including the unemployed themselves), on the other; (c) studying the nature of the interaction between EU-level and national policy-making by determining the channels of political influence that exist between European institutions and national policy domains in the field (the multi-level governance of employment policy), and examining to what extent there are new political opportunities for the bottom-up empowerment of citizens' organizations as a consequence of the emergence of the EU as an actor in the field. A new body of data will be generated which will allow for longitudinal (1990-2002) and comparative (F, D, I, S, CH, UK) analyses of ideological and policy positions of actors and their relationships in the unemployment issue-field. This will be backed up by interviews conducted with key actors in the organizational field (policy actors, employers associations, trade unions, parties, NGOs and social movements) both at the national and transnational levels. Innovative attempts will be made to establish networks and links between the involved actors as part of our dissemination strategy, which is key to the overall success of the project. Expected results: The success of this project is underwritten by the European dimension. It will provide the first systematic cross-national comparison of the contentious politics of unemployment based on original data. It has a high potential for being a path-breaking academic study in labour politics, social movements and Europe. The findings will feedback understanding to the actors in the field, facilitated through our dissemination strategy which aims to contribute toward a constructive social dialogue.