This book presents practical, straightforward advice on public order offences ranging from drunken brawls and football offences to more serious issues such as violent protest and terrorism, helping police officers make decisions under pressure and contain potentially volatile situations.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
This research is based on the background of the problem of the gap between the substance of the Regional Regulation of Badung Regency Number 7 of 2016 concerning Public Order and Peace of the People in the Badung Regency region with the facts that occur in the field. The aims was to find out how the authority and remedies for enforcement of regional government regulations in the context of implementing public order and peace of mind by the Public Order Enforcersin Badung Regency. The research method used is quantitative descriptive with an empirical legal research approach. The data used are primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. The method of determining the sample used is probability sampling. Data is collected through documentation techniques, observation and interviews. The results showed that the authority of Badung District Public Order Enforcersin organizing public order was regulated in the Badung District Regulation Number 7 of 2016 and supported by other Regulations in the Badung Regency area. Legal efforts of the Public Order Enforcers such as the act of controlling, demolition, sealing, closing the business operations and so forth. The remedies are pre-incentive non-judicial and judicial.
Does economic deterioration in a developed country such as Great Britain inevitably mean increasing disorder and lawlessness? How would the forces of law and order react to authoritarian governments of the political left and right? These two questions and the likely answers form the first part of this essay.The Royal Commission on the Police (1962) faced the question of either retaining a police system based on local government or recommending its replacement by a national police force under the Home Secretary. With one powerful dissension they chose the former. They claimed to have solved the problem of democratic accountability of the police, but in recent years cracks have begun to appear in the system. The vexed question of the prospects of schism between a chief constable and his police authority committee is examined.Finally, it is suggested the British governmental institutions, including Parliament itself, are insufficiently democratic, and that a Bill of Rights protecting civil liberties is long overdue.