Public ordering of private coercion: urban redevelopment and democratization in South Korea
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 371-390
ISSN: 1598-2408
1027 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 371-390
ISSN: 1598-2408
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 371-390
ISSN: 2234-6643
AbstractThis study explores collaboration between state actors and non-state specialists in the market for coercion. We focus on the case of forced evictions in South Korea, where violence carried out by private companies has occurred with the implicit, and at times explicit, sanctioning of the state. This level of government–private security cooperation has traditionally been explained by various hypotheses, including arguments about the weak capacity of a state to enforce compliance, trends in the neo-liberal marketization of state power, or as the outcome of a state being captured by the capitalist classes. Documenting the history of urban redevelopment projects and changes in government responses to major protest incidents in Korea, we instead argue that this niche market for private force is an observable implication of a shift in state–society relations in the wake of democratization. This phenomenon is, in effect, a very undemocratic response to democratization, by state elites.
In: Business Law Today, p. 1, July 2011
SSRN
In: Global economic review, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 1-19
ISSN: 1744-3873
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 53-64
In: Futures, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 53-64
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 53-64
ISSN: 0016-3287
In: International review of law and economics, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 453-477
ISSN: 0144-8188
In: Florida State University Law Review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 415-458
SSRN
In: Revue d'économie politique, Band 117, Heft 1, S. 37-60
ISSN: 2105-2883
Classements des alternatives sociales et évaluation des politiques publiques Une nouvelle méthode d'évaluation des politiques publiques a été proposée récemment. Elle requiert que soient construits des ordres complets des allocations des ressources, basés sur des critères d'efficacité, de justice distributive et d'invariance par rapport à des modifications de variables irrelevantes. Ensuite, on déduit la politique publique appropriée en maximisant un tel classement sous les contraintes imposées par l'asymétrie d'information ou d'autres contraintes institutionnelles. L'article propose une illustration de cette nouvelle approche dans le cas de la production et du partage des coûts d'un bien public et le cas du système de taxation des revenus du travail.
In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Band 41, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Journal of Public Economics, Band 95, Heft 3-4, S. 225-238
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 48, S. 49-59
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Political geography, Band 48, S. 49
ISSN: 0962-6298