Ar Lietuvos teisinėje sistemoje įtvirtintas išplėstinis genocido sudėties apibrėžimas nepažeidžia principo nullum crimen sine lege? ; Wether the extended genocide structure established in Lithuanian legal system does not violate principle nullum crimen sine lege?
Genocide is described as one of the most severe crimes of the international law. After the Second World War international community decided to codify international law and the general principles of the law recognized by civilized nations. The United Nations enacted The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The convention stated that genocide crime is described as acts against national, ethnic, racial or religious group. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, many countries including Lithuania got back their independence. Lithuania's legislators incorporated the norms of the Genocide convention into the state's legal system. Besides these norms legislators also included social and political groups into the definition of genocide crime. It was done in order to punish persons, who were responsible for the criminal offense against Lithuania's citizen during soviet occupation. The decision that states legislators made extended the definition of genocide crime established in international law, which defines genocide as the acts against national, ethnic, racial or religious group, but not against social or political group. Under international principle nullum crimen sine lege a person should not face criminal punishment except for an act that was criminalized by law before he performed the act. In this work it is aimed to determine whether the extended genocide structure established in Lithuanian legal system does not violate principle nullum crimen sine lege. First of all, there were analyzed the definition of genocide crime and the reasons why social and political groups were not included. Before the Genocide convention, this act had no name and the first one, who came up with the name was R. Lemkin, who wrote a book about genocide crime. Then United Nations enacted the convention, which determines the genocide as the acts against national, ethnic, racial or religious group. During the process there were a lot of discussions about the groups, which should be protected by the convention, the social and political groups were also included in the projects. But some countries including Soviet Union disagreed with the protection of these groups. So, the social and political groups were not included into the Genocide convention because of the political reasons. But besides that, there is a number of other countries like Lithuania, which also included the social and political groups into their domestic laws in order to protect them. Secondly, there is a description of the principle nullum crimen sine lege. There were analyzed the application of the principle and the exception of it. The principle means that a person should not face criminal punishment except for an act that was criminalized by law before he performed the act. The exception is applied to sui generis offenses – war crimes and crimes against humanity, which is recognized by the civilized nations. This means that the exception of nullum crimen sine lege is applied to the crime of genocide too. Thirdly, it was analyzed the reasons why Lithuania's legislators included the social and political groups into the definition of genocide. In order to punish persons, who were responsible for the acts against Lithuanians during the occupation of Soviet Union the definition was extended by adding social and political groups into the definition. When the persecution of the perpetrators in Lithuania has started, there were perceived that it was not easy to prove the extermination of national and ethnic groups. It was easier to prove the special intent to exterminate the political and social groups, because soviets acts were directed to the specific groups of Lithuanians, which cannot be described as national, ethnic, racial or religious groups. Fourthly, in the work there were analyzed the definitions of social and political groups. Social group is a group where members are related with common ties and characteristics. The national, ethnic, racial and religious groups are also social groups even though the social group itself was not included in the Genocide convention. But not all social groups are national, ethnic, racial or religious groups, so the Genocide convention protects only a certain type of social groups. Political groups are groups, where members are related with common beliefs, which can be compared even with the religious beliefs. The drafters of the Genocide convention justified the exclusion of political group from the protected list of groups because it lacked the stability. But there were no discussions about including the religious group, which is as stable as political group. Finally, there were analyzed the relation between the extended definition of genocide and principle nullum crimen sine lege. Even though the exception of the principle nullum crimen sine lege is applicable to the crime of genocide, it is applied only to the crime, which is defined by the general principles of international law, which is recognized be the civilized nations. That means that exception is valid for the acts against national, ethnic, racial or religious groups, but not to social or political groups, because these two groups are not protected from genocide crime by the Genocide convention and other international laws.