Suchergebnisse

International audience ; Based on his experience working as a sociologist in the field of violent extremism, Conti argues that the terms "disengagement" and "deradicalisation" are limited in their meaning, as they consider the radicalised person "as an actor with no legitimacy and without any genuine political commitment". Offering a new approach to reintegrating radicalised individuals into society, Conti describes a 2015 study which he conducted entitled engagements citoyens ("civic commitments") in which 12 inmates were interviewed and encouraged to speak about their struggles inside and outside of prison, while also speaking with prison staff and other members of society. The primary aims of this programme were to enable inmates to engage in conversation with individuals having different perspectives and to continue instructing them in light of what they revealed in the last phase of the programme, during which they spoke about themselves and described "personal hardship related to their B. Conti (*) Centre d'analyse et d'intervention sociologiques (CADIS)

International audience ; Based on his experience working as a sociologist in the field of violent extremism, Conti argues that the terms "disengagement" and "deradicalisation" are limited in their meaning, as they consider the radicalised person "as an actor with no legitimacy and without any genuine political commitment". Offering a new approach to reintegrating radicalised individuals into society, Conti describes a 2015 study which he conducted entitled engagements citoyens ("civic commitments") in which 12 inmates were interviewed and encouraged to speak about their struggles inside and outside of prison, while also speaking with prison staff and other members of society. The primary aims of this programme were to enable inmates to engage in conversation with individuals having different perspectives and to continue instructing them in light of what they revealed in the last phase of the programme, during which they spoke about themselves and described "personal hardship related to their B. Conti (*) Centre d'analyse et d'intervention sociologiques (CADIS)

American foreign policy in Southeast Asia from 1975 to the present can be characterized as exhibiting varying degrees of benign neglect, with episodic attention to perceived security threats. Current policies are narrowly focused on anti-terrorism; their perceived anti-Muslim overtones, while engendering instrumental cooperation, have tended to alienate Southeast Asian publics. U.S. influence in Southeast Asia appears to be waning, with China capitalizing on opportunities to expand its influence.