Suchergebnisse

The socially useful effect of broadcasts by broadcasting organizations aimed at distributing creative objects and information to representatives of the public is rewarded by the recognition of exclusive rights to the results of their intellectual activity by these organizations. Although illegal rebroadcasting of radio and television broadcasts on the air or by cable are not excluded, most violations of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations are currently committed in information and telecommunications networks, including the Internet. The purpose of this article is to identify problematic aspects in the protection of the rights of broadcasting organizations in court. The article analyzes the Russian legislation concerning the activities of broadcasting organizations, as well as judicial practice in cases of violation of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations. In case of violations of the exclusive rights of broadcasting organizations on the Internet, broadcasting organizations use, among other things, protective mechanisms provided for by the legislation on information, information technologies and information protection, and may also apply to the Moscow City Court for the application of preliminary interim measures of copyright and related rights protection against illegally used objects. However, broadcasting on the Internet around the world remains a gray area from the point of view of law, and legal relations with the participation of broadcasting organizations require additional legal regulation. There is no unambiguous answer in Russian legislation to the question whether the rebroadcasting on the Internet can be considered as making to the public, or such rebroadcasting should be considered as an independent way of using broadcasting that is not reflected in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. ; Общественно полезный эффект от трансляций организаций вещания, направленных на распространение творческих объектов и информации представителям публики, вознаграждается признанием за данными организациями исключительных прав на результаты их интеллектуальной деятельности. Хотя не исключены инеправомерные ретрансляции радио- ителепередач вэфир или по кабелю, большинство нарушений исключительных прав организаций вещания внастоящее время совершается в информационно-телекоммуникационных сетях, включая интернет. Цель настоящей статьи— выявление проблемных аспектов при защите прав организаций вещания всудебном порядке. В статье анализируются российское законодательство, касающееся деятельности организаций вещания, атакже судебная практика по делам о нарушении исключительных прав организаций вещания. Вслучае нарушений исключительных прав организаций вещания винтернете организации вещания пользуются втом числе защитными механизмами, предусмотренными законодательством об информации, информационных технологиях и о защите информации, атакже могут обратиться вМосковских городской суд за применением вотношении неправомерно используемых объектов предварительных обеспечительных мер защиты авторского права и смежных прав. Однако вещание винтернете во всем мире остается сточки зрения права серой зоной, аправоотношения сучастием организаций вещания требуют дополнительного правового регулирования. Вроссийском законодательстве отсутствует однозначный ответ на вопрос, может ли ретрансляция сообщения передач винтернете рассматриваться как доведение до всеобщего сведения или такую ретрансляцию следует рассматривать как самостоятельный способ использования сообщений, не нашедший отражение вГражданском кодексе Российской Федерации.

Cover -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- 1 An Invitation to a Historical Reenactment -- 2 A Culture Goes to School: An Integrative Revolution in a Developing Country -- 3 Robert Coles as Domestic Goodwill Ambassador of the Second Reconstruction -- 4 William H. Cosby, Victorian Reformer, and the Integrative Properties of Humor -- 5 Joan Ganz Cooney's Sesame Street and the Rebroadcasting of Social Change -- 6 Lessons from a Historical Reenactment -- Notes -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- Y -- Z.

Abstract. The geostationary arc is an orbit in space in which a satellite, 22,300 miles up, moving at the speed at which the earth revolves, can continue to hover over a continent on earth, monitoring weather and military activities, rebroadcasting entertainment and information programs, newspaper and magazine printing plates and particularly communications. In the latter use it replaces surface microwave relay transmitters every 30 miles (which replaced the much more expensive long landlines), at an estimated savings of more than half a billion dollars annually for this use alone. Because the orbit cannot accommodate all the applicants for slots within it, the Federal Government should grant, for an adequate fee, three year licenses, raising the fee on renewal to absorb the annual economic rent.

As Internet technology has advanced, consumers have increasingly opted to view video content on their computer, tablet, and smartphone screens instead of their television screens. In American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. ("Aereo III"), decided in 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected one of the more creative methods of delivering content via the Internet, closing a legal loophole by ruling that a company could not escape copyright liability by characterizing its retransmission of content as simply providing the consumer with equipment. Although the ruling definitively answered one question that had been subject to debate, the battle over Internet broadcasting has simply moved to another arena. The decision has led Aereo and similar companies to argue that they should be allowed to take advantage of the compulsory licensing scheme available to "cable systems" under Section 111 of the Copyright Act. The result of this new debate could have far-reaching effects on how consumers can access television content and on how the courts will interpret the Copyright Act in the future. This Note examines the decisions made in the wake of Aereo III that have addressed the application of Section 111 and, in particular, contrasts the reasoning of Fox v. Aereokiller, in which the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that Internet rebroadcasting services are eligible for a compulsory license under Section 111, with the reasoning of courts that have come to the opposite conclusion. This Note argues that both the text of Section 111 and its legislative history demonstrate that Internet rebroadcasting services fall under the statutory definition of "cable system." It further argues that granting access to the compulsory licensing scheme would accomplish the important policy goal of increasing competition in the marketplace.

The purpose of the article is to give a review of the current environment of management and the development of culture and arts in the system of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine. The methodology of research is the application of the descriptive method and definitive analysis, functional analysis, formal characterization in the process of research regarding the national field of management and development of culture and arts segment in Ukraine. The scientific novelty is the analysis of the institutional field of national development of culture and arts in Ukraine. The scientific novelty is an analysis of the institutional field of development of national culture and art in the aspects of public administration, institutions of higher education (HEI) in the indicated areas, and government mass media channels. Conclusions: Effective organization of national management of institutional field development of national forms of cultural and art interaction – that is the Ukrainian cultural need in the process of its civilizational development. The main aspects of development and support of culture and arts from the government institutions side, in our opinion, are coordination of means of the government management system in the cultural and arts industry, institutions of higher education in culture and arts industries, and mass media broadcasting channels, which are owned by the government. National artistic, cultural-and-artistic, artistic-and-technological, scientific, educational, cultural and intellectual-and-creative capable part of a human capital asset (involved in the systems of the national arts and creative production, including government management organizations in the field of cultural and creative industries) must support the organization of national arts and cultural platforms of interaction based on communicative cooperation of groups of arts and cultural production, as well as comprehensive rebroadcasting of the best-produced products by unions of arts and cultural production by informative, mass media, arts, educational governmental means (tangible and intangible). The country should unite the efforts of specialists in this sector in the field of institutional communication of cultural-and-arts interaction, should support the formation of bases for the practical production of the national arts and cultural production of all branches of the sector of cultural and creative industries of Ukraine.

The purpose of the article is to give a review of the current environment of management and the development of culture and arts in the system of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine. The methodology of research is the application of the descriptive method and definitive analysis, functional analysis, formal characterization in the process of research regarding the national field of management and development of culture and arts segment in Ukraine. The scientific novelty is the analysis of the institutional field of national development of culture and arts in Ukraine. The scientific novelty is an analysis of the institutional field of development of national culture and art in the aspects of public administration, institutions of higher education (HEI) in the indicated areas, and government mass media channels. Conclusions: Effective organization of national management of institutional field development of national forms of cultural and art interaction – that is the Ukrainian cultural need in the process of its civilizational development. The main aspects of development and support of culture and arts from the government institutions side, in our opinion, are coordination of means of the government management system in the cultural and arts industry, institutions of higher education in culture and arts industries, and mass media broadcasting channels, which are owned by the government. National artistic, cultural-and-artistic, artistic-and-technological, scientific, educational, cultural and intellectual-and-creative capable part of a human capital asset (involved in the systems of the national arts and creative production, including government management organizations in the field of cultural and creative industries) must support the organization of national arts and cultural platforms of interaction based on communicative cooperation of groups of arts and cultural production, as well as comprehensive rebroadcasting of the best-produced products by unions of arts and cultural production by informative, mass media, arts, educational governmental means (tangible and intangible). The country should unite the efforts of specialists in this sector in the field of institutional communication of cultural-and-arts interaction, should support the formation of bases for the practical production of the national arts and cultural production of all branches of the sector of cultural and creative industries of Ukraine. ; Мета роботи – дати характеристику сучасного середовища управління та розвитку культури та мистецтв у системі культурно-креативних індустрій в Україні. Методологія полягає в застосуванні описового методу, дефінітивного аналізу, функціонального аналізу, формалізації в процесі дослідження державного поля управління та розвитку сектору культури та мистецтв в Україні. Наукова новизна являє собою аналіз інституціонального поля розвитку вітчизняної культури та мистецтв в аспектах державного управління, закладів вищої освіти (ЗВО) в означених галузях та державних каналах інформаційної комунікації. Висновки. Ефективна організація державного управління інституціональним полем розвитку національних форм культурної та мистецької взаємодії – необхідність української культури в процесі її цивілізаційного розвитку. Основними аспектами розвитку й підтримки культури та мистецтв з боку діяльності державних інституцій ми вважаємо координацію засобів системи державного управління в галузі культури та мистецтв, ЗВО в галузях культури та мистецтв, та інформаційних масових комунікаційних каналів ретрансляції, що належать державі. Національна мистецька, культурно-мистецька, мистецько-технологічна, наукова, освітня, культурно та інтелектуально-креативно спроможна частина людського капіталу, задіяна у системах державного мистецького і культурного виробництва (МіКВ), включаючи організації державного управління в галузях культурно-креативних індустрій, повинна сприяти організації національних мистецьких та культурних платформ взаємодії на основі комунікаційної співпраці груп МіКВ, а також всебічній ретрансляції найкращих з вироблених мистецькими об'єднаннями товарів МіКВ державними інформаційними, комунікаційними, освітніми, мистецькими матеріальними й нематеріальними засобами. Державі необхідно об'єднати зусилля фахівців даного сектору в полі інституціональної комунікаційної культурно-мистецької взаємодії, сприяти формуванню баз практичного виробництва національного МіКВ усіх галузей сектору культурних та креативних індустрій України.