Suchergebnisse

Global challenges have been affecting the world constantly. Thus there are pressures to innovate and adapt to changing conditions. State in this context is not an exception. It can be argued that the states have been experiencing far greater pressures to find the best solutions to amortize global pressure. One of the most favorable way to do that, turn to regional organizations. To date, the most successful regional organization is considered to be the European Union, followed by ASEAN. However, the research comparing these two organizations is not much on the fact that there are well-established opinions, that EU n=1 case and a large part of the regional classic theories originate from the EU intellectual heritage. The new regionalism approach throw a challenge to claim that the EU can be compared and should be compared, because it is the only one way to understand the processes of regional mechanisms.The analysis of these two regional organizations regionalization processes shift have shoved that. EU and ASEAN regionalization processes change is almost the same at their start, dominates security issues. They are totally different in their functioning, the EU followed hard institutionalization and promotion of supranational institutions. ASEAN have avoided of any form of institutionalization and promoted the informality. Only partially comparable influence to Member States and third countries where EU has acquired a more solid experience. It was also discovered that non-state actors have had different roles. The EU institutions have provided basis for non-state actors to thrive on contrary in ASEAN non-state actors produced such platform that later has been supported by officials.

Regionalization refers to the process of cooperation, integration, cohesion and identity creation in a regional space and involves state as well as non-state actors. Regionalization serves as a tool for settling conflicts and securing peace among nations. The conflicts and the spillovers they produce in regions such as the Middle East are acknowledged as being of paramount concern to international security. Building regional peace and security is a stepping stone to the construction of a more secure global order. Transforming regions into pluralistic security communities, moving from zones of war to stable zones of peace, has assumed increasing importance. The ongoing spatial formation is defined and explained as a gradual regional transformation movement from a Machiavellian-Keynesian geopolitical rationality toward a Porterian-Floridian one. These political rationalities are motivated by the perceived nature of the contemporary security environment in which a specific type of competitiveness (competitive regionalism/city-regionalism) has partly superseded military-based security issues. There is a growing emphasis on endogenous processes, utilizing regional assets, institutions and knowledge and promoting intra-regional links via cluster policies as the key to regional economic success in a global political economy. It is acknowledged that innovation, competitiveness, clusters, networks, and top quality are key shibboleths in the plans which present long-term future visions for the regions. The author is crafting a research that could measure regional performance in political, socio-economic, societal and environmental aspects with respect to regionalization processes, regional security and regional transformation. Rather than using European Union as the standard from which to explain all other cases of regionalization, or excluding European Union altogether in theorizing attempts, author emphasizes that it is important to enhance the comparative regional analysis. In order not to be restrained to the European Union model, the volume encompass multi-paradigmatic and eclectic analysis that could explain in detail why the European Union regionalization model cannot be replicated in the Middle East, in the core countries of the Levant in particular.

Regionalization refers to the process of cooperation, integration, cohesion and identity creation in a regional space and involves state as well as non-state actors. Regionalization serves as a tool for settling conflicts and securing peace among nations. The conflicts and the spillovers they produce in regions such as the Middle East are acknowledged as being of paramount concern to international security. Building regional peace and security is a stepping stone to the construction of a more secure global order. Transforming regions into pluralistic security communities, moving from zones of war to stable zones of peace, has assumed increasing importance. The ongoing spatial formation is defined and explained as a gradual regional transformation movement from a Machiavellian-Keynesian geopolitical rationality toward a Porterian-Floridian one. These political rationalities are motivated by the perceived nature of the contemporary security environment in which a specific type of competitiveness (competitive regionalism/city-regionalism) has partly superseded military-based security issues. There is a growing emphasis on endogenous processes, utilizing regional assets, institutions and knowledge and promoting intra-regional links via cluster policies as the key to regional economic success in a global political economy. It is acknowledged that innovation, competitiveness, clusters, networks, and top quality are key shibboleths in the plans which present long-term future visions for the regions. The author is crafting a research that could measure regional performance in political, socio-economic, societal and environmental aspects with respect to regionalization processes, regional security and regional transformation. Rather than using European Union as the standard from which to explain all other cases of regionalization, or excluding European Union altogether in theorizing attempts, author emphasizes that it is important to enhance the comparative regional analysis. In order not to be restrained to the European Union model, the volume encompass multi-paradigmatic and eclectic analysis that could explain in detail why the European Union regionalization model cannot be replicated in the Middle East, in the core countries of the Levant in particular.

Regionalization refers to the process of cooperation, integration, cohesion and identity creation in a regional space and involves state as well as non-state actors. Regionalization serves as a tool for settling conflicts and securing peace among nations. The conflicts and the spillovers they produce in regions such as the Middle East are acknowledged as being of paramount concern to international security. Building regional peace and security is a stepping stone to the construction of a more secure global order. Transforming regions into pluralistic security communities, moving from zones of war to stable zones of peace, has assumed increasing importance. The ongoing spatial formation is defined and explained as a gradual regional transformation movement from a Machiavellian-Keynesian geopolitical rationality toward a Porterian-Floridian one. These political rationalities are motivated by the perceived nature of the contemporary security environment in which a specific type of competitiveness (competitive regionalism/city-regionalism) has partly superseded military-based security issues. There is a growing emphasis on endogenous processes, utilizing regional assets, institutions and knowledge and promoting intra-regional links via cluster policies as the key to regional economic success in a global political economy. It is acknowledged that innovation, competitiveness, clusters, networks, and top quality are key shibboleths in the plans which present long-term future visions for the regions. The author is crafting a research that could measure regional performance in political, socio-economic, societal and environmental aspects with respect to regionalization processes, regional security and regional transformation. Rather than using European Union as the standard from which to explain all other cases of regionalization, or excluding European Union altogether in theorizing attempts, author emphasizes that it is important to enhance the comparative regional analysis. In order not to be restrained to the European Union model, the volume encompass multi-paradigmatic and eclectic analysis that could explain in detail why the European Union regionalization model cannot be replicated in the Middle East, in the core countries of the Levant in particular.

The paper analyzes contemporary rural development, which includes economic, social, political, cultural and environmental changes and tendencies that appeared in the recent years. The possibility to apply European rural development model is discussed. This model changes approach to rural areas. It is characterized by concept of sustainable rural development, multifunctional agriculture with focus on rural heritage, organic farming, and modernization of rural settlements. Long-term strategy of development of rural areas is based on the modern tendencies of economics in post-industrial society and prospects for creation of educated and active society, as well as on optimal use of local resources and creation of safe and comfortable environment for the present and future generations. Much attention is paid to sustainable use of renewable energy sources, organic agriculture, and healthy lifestyle. European rural development model is a contrast to the so-called Cairns Group model, which favours aggressive actions to ensure rapid profit growth, using for this purpose all the currently available technologies and measures in hope that future generations will find new ways to restore degraded areas and resources to survive. [.]

The paper analyzes contemporary rural development, which includes economic, social, political, cultural and environmental changes and tendencies that appeared in the recent years. The possibility to apply European rural development model is discussed. This model changes approach to rural areas. It is characterized by concept of sustainable rural development, multifunctional agriculture with focus on rural heritage, organic farming, and modernization of rural settlements. Long-term strategy of development of rural areas is based on the modern tendencies of economics in post-industrial society and prospects for creation of educated and active society, as well as on optimal use of local resources and creation of safe and comfortable environment for the present and future generations. Much attention is paid to sustainable use of renewable energy sources, organic agriculture, and healthy lifestyle. European rural development model is a contrast to the so-called Cairns Group model, which favours aggressive actions to ensure rapid profit growth, using for this purpose all the currently available technologies and measures in hope that future generations will find new ways to restore degraded areas and resources to survive. [.]

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

This work explores the tendencies of globalization and regionalization in the modern Civil Procedure within European and Eurasian regions. These tendencies take the form of systematic convergence of national laws on Civil Justice, which basically may appear in two forms: unification (elaboration of common rules for several countries) and harmonization (establishment of consistent regulation). The present research seeks to find out who, under what conditions and for what purpose may need convergence in procedural sphere; why this phenomenon is relatively new in contemporary law. According to the author, convergence may be achieved through such mechanisms as international treaty-making and supranational lawmaking, judicial rulemaking and the drafting of model acts. Dissertation intends to demonstrate how the process of CPL approximation takes place within the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, what difficulties their Member States come across, how is it possible to improve the situation and what are the perspectives of the two regions cooperation. The work applies systemic, logical, comparative, historical, documentary-analytical and other methods. Research is based on a significant number of normative and non-normative acts, scholar articles and monographs, as well as case law. The object, aim and tasks of the work demonstrate that it is predominantly doctrinal in nature, that is why a key role belongs to theoretical methods and analytical work with the sources.

The article deals with the current situation in the field of Civil Procedure approximation in the Community of Independent States (CIS) countries and the perspectives of further regional and worldwide harmonization and unification of this branch there. As the comparative object, the law of the European Union is taken, the Member States of which managed to achieve a certain progress in the field of development of common Civil Procedure.