Discussion is dedicated to the study of legal problems of stimulating the interest of businesses in the use of scientiic research and conducting their own research. The relevance of the proposed topic due to the fact that one of the most acute problems of the Russian economy is little demand from the business sector on the existing industrial intellectual property. Identiied problems allowed to develop proposals for improving the legal regulation aimed at the formation and growth of the volume of intangible assets and transactions with them. The author of the report proposes to amend the Russian legislation in the ield of tax regulation, the integration of education and research in business and economics, regulation of labour of research fellows, the settlement of disputes in the ield of intellectual property, promotion of small innovative enterprises, procurement for state and municipal needs.
In: Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: official publication of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Band 9, Heft 6, S. 372-378
The idea of abolishing or simplifying government regulations has a large following in Washington at the moment. As Reagan and his minions start to prune the growth of the past twenty years, we must hope that they are able to distinguish between the healthy growth which provides needed support and the unnecessary growth which strangles necessary initiatives. However, there is one area where we need more regulation rather than less, namely, biomedical research. In calling for more regulation in biomedical research, I do not mean the imposition of outside controls by allegedly ignorant and insensitive bureaucrats (although I think some outside control is unfortunately necessary), but rather the control which scientists themselves are meant to exercise over their work. I am calling for more attention to the regulation and control of experimental variables, such control being ever more important as the questions asked probe deeper and deeper into the subtle workings of biological systems.
The Community Research Fellows Training (CRFT) Program promotes the role of underserved populations in research by enhancing the capacity for community-based participatory research (CBPR). CRFT consists of 12 didactic training sessions and 3 experiential workshops intended to train community members in research methods and evidence-based public health. The training (a) promotes partnerships between community members and academic researchers, (b) enhances community knowledge of public health research, and (c) trains community members to become critical consumers of research. Fifty community members participated in training sessions taught by multidisciplinary faculty. Forty-five (90%) participants completed the program. Findings demonstrate that the training increased awareness of health disparities, research knowledge, and the capacity to use CBPR as a tool to address disparities.
A consideration of perceptions of Australia's declining international recognition focuses on the contributions of Australian economists to their country's international reputation. A review of articles published in top-rated refereed journals by Fellows listed under the economics discipline between 1990 & 2004 indicated that only a third of them had published more than one paper during the 15-year period. A look at the annual publication rate showed that the average of 9.9 articles by Fellows during the 1990s had dropped to three in the 21st century. It was also found that 33 percent of the total contributions by Australians were in the six journals published by econometricians & economic historians while few Australian economists were represented in inter-disciplinary journals. Although the Australian academic economic establishment must decide whether or not these results are a matter of concern, it does not seem unreasonable to expect Australians to be well represented in the leading journals of their profession. It is suggested that economic scholars shift their focus from quantity of output to quality. Tables. J. Lindroth
The article describes the problems of legal regulation of the work of convicts. The article examines the issue of compulsory labor of such persons. The law replaced the duty to work with the right. It is determined that work is the key to achieving the goal of punishment, which provides not only punishment but also resocialization of the person.Labor is one of the main means of influencing criminals, which instils in them law-abiding behavior.Modern conditions of detention of convicts, namely securing the right of convicts to work, are not able to fully ensure the realization of the purpose of punishment.That is why they are once again on the path of crime.In this regard, it is necessary to change the regime of detention of convicts in places of imprisonment. Firstly, convicts must be properly motivated to volunteer, as compulsory labor has been abolished. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to raise wages, set minimum free standards for the detention of prisoners, and make additional services paid. This will provide an incentive for convicts to work and promote the resocialization of the individual. Secondly, it is very difficult for convicts to find employment after release. this requires proper government support. It is expedient to introduce quotas for employment of such persons. The article considers the legal status of convicts in terms of criminal executive and labor law. It is established that currently the legal regulation of the remuneration for work of convicts has significant shortcomings. In order to correct them, it is necessary to legislate the procedure for calculating the wage of convicts. In addition, it must be established that the convict's salary will be directly proportional to the output.This will promote the interest of convicts in work. In summary, the aforementioned measures will contribute to the realization of the purpose of punishment, namely the resocialization of such persons. In addition, it will allow convicts to directly influence their security in prisons.