Transparency Challenges in Reproductive Health Care
In: Transparency in Health and Health Care: Legal and Ethical Possibilities and Limits (editors Glenn Cohen, Barbara Evans, Holly Fernandez Lynch & Carmel Shachar) (Forthcoming)
444473 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Transparency in Health and Health Care: Legal and Ethical Possibilities and Limits (editors Glenn Cohen, Barbara Evans, Holly Fernandez Lynch & Carmel Shachar) (Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: Forced migration review, Heft special issue, S. 24-25
ISSN: 1460-9819
There is increased awareness that reproductive health care is a life-saving necessity in the early stages of an emergency. An evaluation in Aceh has highlighted current shortcomings & the need for greater training & awareness raising. Adapted from the source document.
In: NBER Working Paper No. w23768
SSRN
Working paper
In Conscience in Reproductive Health Care, Carolyn McLeod responds to a growing worldwide trend of health care professionals conscientiously refusing to provide abortions and similar reproductive health services in countries where these services are legal and professionally accepted. She argues that conscientious objectors in health care should have to prioritize the interests of patients in receiving care over their own interest in acting on their conscience. McLeod defends this 'prioritizing approach' to conscientious objection over the more popular 'compromise approach' in bioethics-without downplaying the importance of health care professionals having a conscience or the moral complexity of their conscientious refusals. She begins with a description of what is at stake for the main parties to the conflicts generated by conscientious refusals in reproductive health care: the objector and the patient. Her central argument for the prioritizing approach is that health care professionals who are charged with gatekeeping access to services such as abortions are fiduciaries for their patients and for the public they are licensed to serve. As such, they have a duty of loyalty to these beneficiaries and must give primacy to their interests in gaining access to care. McLeod provides insights into ethical issues extending beyond the question of conscientious refusal, including the value of conscience and the fundamental moral nature of the relationships health care professionals have with current and prospective patients
In: Oxford scholarship online
There is a growing trend worldwide of health care professionals conscientiously refusing to provide abortions and similar reproductive health services in countries where these services are legal and professionally accepted. Carolyn McLeod responds to this problem by arguing that conscientious objectors in health care should have to prioritize the interests of patients in receiving care over their own interest in acting on their conscience. She defends this "prioritizing approach" to conscientious objection over the more popular "compromise approach" in bioethics. All the while, she is careful not to downplay the importance of health care professionals having a conscience or the moral complexity of their conscientious refusals.
Carolyn McLeod responds to a growing trend of health care professionals conscientiously refusing to provide reproductive health services such as abortion. She argues for a prioritizing approach, according to which medical practitioners have a fiduciary duty to prioritize patients' interests in gaining access to care
In: Forced migration review, Heft 19, S. 33-34
ISSN: 1460-9819
In: Forced migration review, Heft spec, S. 24-25
ISSN: 1460-9819
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 129-165
ISSN: 1545-6943
In: Reproductive Health and Human Rights, S. 276-286
In: Forced migration review, Heft 32, S. 68-69
ISSN: 1460-9819
The provision of comprehensive reproductive health supplies and services in all situations would help prevent many unnecessary deaths of women and babies. Adapted from the source document.
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 371-393
ISSN: 0951-6328
In: Quality 13
In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2022;157: 210–215.
SSRN