Suchergebnisse

The main purpose of this article is to study the role of the Russian Museum in the formation of the historical consciousness of Russian society. In this context, the author examines the history of the creation of the Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III and its pre-revolutionary collections that became the basis of this famous museum collection (in particular, the composition of the museum's expositions for 1898 and 1915). Within the framework of the methodology proposed by the author, the works of art presented in the museum's halls were selected and distributed according to the historical eras that they reflect, and a comparative analysis of changes in the composition of the expositions was also carried out. This approach made it possible to identify the most frequently encountered historical heroes, to consider the representation of their images in the museum's expositions, and also to provide a systemic reconstruction of historical representations broadcast in its halls.

The article considers the initiatives of the Russian Emperor Alexander I and his Unofficial Committee in question of Censorship Reform. The article gives an account of the the community influence in question organization of the Censorial Statute of 1804.

"The reign of Alexander I was a pivotal moment in the construction of Russia's national mythology. This work examines this crucial period focusing on the place of the Russian nobility in relation to their ruler, and the accompanying debate between reform and the status quo, between a Russia old and new, and between different visions of what Russia could become. Drawing on extensive archival research and placing a long-neglected emphasis on this aspect of Alexander I's reign, this book is an important work for students and scholars of imperial Russia, as well as the wider Napoleonic and post-Napoleonic period in Europe."--Bloomsbury Publishing

Educated in the spirit of the Enlightenment, upon his accession to the throne in March 1801, Alexander I, intending to reform his empire, gave priority to domestic issues; but very quickly, foreign policy came to dominate the agenda, and his duel with Napoleon wholly absorbed his energies. Because of the ambivalence of the Tilsit alliance, Russian-French relations continuously deteriorated after 1807, leading to the 1812 tragedy. Vanquisher of Napoleon, the tsar who has been transformed by the ordeal (he became religious), became anxious to rebuild the European continent on a new basis. This explains the personal role he played during the Vienna Congress and the project of Holy Alliance that he encouraged. But by 1820-21, Alexander became more and more paranoiac in his political views and the Holy Alliance has been transformed into a tool to repress liberal ideas in the service of conservative regimes. ; Alejandro I, entronizado en marzo de 1801 y educado en el espíritu de las Luces, toma conciencia de la necesidad de reformar el imperio dando prioridad a las cuestiones internas; pero pronto la política exterior le absorbe totalmente, de forma que su reinado quedará marcado por el enfrentamiento con Napoleón. La alianza de Tilsit se revela ambigua y las relaciones franco-rusas se degradan hasta la tragedia de 1812. El zar, que salió victorioso y transformado de la prueba –se volvió profundamente religioso–, hace sentir su peso en la reconstrucción del continente europeo, jugando un papel personal importante en el Congreso de Viena y en Tratado de la Santa Alianza. Sin embargo, desde 1820-1821 Alejandro I tiene una visión del mundo cada vez más paranoica, y la Santa Alianza se convierte en una herramienta represiva al servicio del absolutismo.

Alejandro I, entronizado en marzo de 1801 y educado en el espíritu de las Luces, toma conciencia de la necesidad de reformar el imperio dando prioridad a las cuestiones internas; pero pronto la política exterior le absorbe totalmente, de forma que su reinado quedará marcado por el enfrentamiento con Napoleón. La alianza de Tilsit se revela ambigua y las relaciones franco-rusas se degradan hasta la tragedia de 1812. El zar, que salió victorioso y transformado de la prueba –se volvió profundamente religioso–, hace sentir su peso en la reconstrucción del continente europeo, jugando un papel personal importante en el Congreso de Viena y en Tratado de la Santa Alianza. Sin embargo, desde 1820-1821 Alejandro I tiene una visión del mundo cada vez más paranoica, y la Santa Alianza se convierte en una herramienta represiva al servicio del absolutismo. ; Educated in the spirit of the Enlightenment, upon his accession to the throne in March 1801, Alexander I, intending to reform his empire, gave priority to domestic issues; but very quickly, foreign policy came to dominate the agenda, and his duel with Napoleon wholly absorbed his energies. Because of the ambivalence of the Tilsit alliance, Russian-French relations continuously deteriorated after 1807, leading to the 1812 tragedy. Vanquisher of Napoleon, the tsar who has been transformed by the ordeal (he became religious), became anxious to rebuild the European continent on a new basis. This explains the personal role he played during the Vienna Congress and the project of Holy Alliance that he encouraged. But by 1820-21, Alexander became more and more paranoiac in his political views and the Holy Alliance has been transformed into a tool to repress liberal ideas in the service of conservative regimes.

Finland's Ministry of Finance came into being in 1809, when the Russian emperor Alexander I spoke the words of liberty and independence over Finland and its economic policy. This book tells the story of the first steps of economic and financial autonomy and the ongoing processes of wellfare construction and internationalization