Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Foreword -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: How Did Same-Sex Marriage Become Legal in the United States? -- Overview: The Complex Issue of Same-Sex Marriage -- Four Decades of LGBT Activism Paved the Way for Marriage Equality -- American Politics have Shifted Significantly Since the 1990s -- Unequal Treatment Led the Supreme Court to Overturn DOMA -- State Marriage Laws Vary Widely Following DOMA's Demise -- Young People Helped Shift Public Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage -- Gay Marriage Around the World -- Chapter 2: Does Same-Sex Marriage Benefit Society? -- Chapter Preface -- Same-Sex Marriage Benefits Society in Many Ways -- Same-Sex Marriage Strengthens the Institution of Marriage -- Same-Sex Marriage Furthers the American Values of Freedom and Equality -- Marriage Equality Reduces Dependence on Government Social Services -- What's Wrong with Letting Same-Sex Couples "Marry?" -- Same-Sex Marriage Weakens the Institution of Marriage -- Chapter 3: Is Same-Sex Marriage Good for Families and Children? -- Overview: Gay Couples Weigh Financial Options that Accompany Marriage -- Same-Sex Marriage Protects Families and Children in Many Ways -- There is No Scientific Evidence that Same-Sex Marriage Harms Children -- Children in Same-Sex Households are Healthier than their Peers -- Same-Sex Marriage is not Good for Families and Children -- Children Pay a Lifelong Emotional Price for Same-Sex Parenting -- Gay Marriage, then Group Marriage? -- Chapter 4: What are Some other Key Issues with Same-Sex Marriage? -- Chapter Preface -- Same-Sex Marriage has Negative Consequences for Religious Liberty -- Same-Sex Marriage does not Impact Religious Freedom -- Beyond Gay Marriage-Is the LGBT Movement Walking down the Aisle to Nowhere? -- Same-Sex Marriage is Good for the Economy

Cover -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Introduction Real-life case study -- Chapter 1 Same-sex relationships -- Chapter 2 Why get married? -- Chapter 3 Religious rite or civil right? -- Chapter 4 Families and children -- Chapter 5 Effects on society -- Chapter 6 Into the future -- Timeline -- Glossary -- Further Reading -- Index

With same-sex marriage igniting a firestorm of controversy in the press and in the courts, in legislative chambers and in living rooms, Andrew Sullivan, a pioneering voice in the debate, has brought together two thousand years of argument in an anthology of historic inclusiveness and evenhandedness. Among the selections included here:- The 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in support of same-sex marriage- Justice Kennedy's majority opinion and Justice Scalia's dissent in the 2003 landmark Supreme Court decision striking down anti-sodomy laws- President George W. Bush's call for a Federal Marriage Amendment- John Kerry's Senate speech urging defeat of the Defense of Marriage Act- Harvard historian Nancy F. Cott's testimony before the Vermont House Judiciary Committee- Reverend Peter J. Gomes on the distinction between civil and religious marriage- Stanley Kurtz on the politics of gay marriage- Evan Wolfson on the popularity of the right to marry among lesbians and gay men- New York Times op-ed columnist David Brooks' conservative case for same-sex marriage- Excerpts from Genesis, Leviticus, and other essential biblical texts- Aristophanes's classic theory of same-sex love, from Plato's Symposium- Hannah Arendt on marriage as a fundamental right- Camille Paglia's skepticismRepresenting the full range of perspectives and the most cogent and arresting arguments, Same-Sex Marriage is essential to a balanced understanding of the most pressing cultural question we face today.From the Trade Paperback edition.

Scripture condemns various forms of sexual behavior-but not all. Same-Sex in Scripture identifies in Mt. 19:12 an acknowledgement by Christ of the person born without an impulse towards the opposite sex, and reasons that inasmuch as all creation is good (1 Gen. 31, 1Tim. 4:4) this individual in partnership with someone of the same sex, in following Christ's commands of love, has moral status in the Kingdom of Heaven. Geis argues the insufficiency of Nature as a criterion for sexual behavior given the many exceptions from which the criterion when applied to human sexuality suffers. Only Christ's unexceptioned commandment of love has the binding force salvific law requires. Same-sex behavior can comport with this law, just as heterosexual behavior, as is clear from the role Mt. 5:28 gives the heart in sexuality. It is a position that achieves the middle between the extremes of this contentious debate.

Intro -- Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data -- Contents -- Preface -- The Effect of State-Legalized Same-Sex Marriage on Social Security Benefits and Pensions -- Summary -- Social Security -- Federal Employee Pensions -- Private-Sector Pensions -- Bills in the 110th Congress -- End Notes -- Same-Sex Adoptions -- Summary -- End Notes -- Same-Sex Marriages: Legal Issues -- Summary -- Introduction -- Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)34 -- Potential Constitutional Challenges to DOMA37 -- Full Faith and Credit Clause -- Equal Protection -- Substantive Due Process (Right to Privacy) -- Interstate Recognition of Marriage -- States' Responses -- State Litigation -- State Constitutional Amendments Limiting Marriage to a Man and a Woman -- Alabama -- Arkansas -- Arizona -- California -- Colorado -- Florida -- Georgia -- Idaho -- Kansas -- Kentucky -- Louisiana -- Michigan -- Mississippi -- Missouri -- Montana -- North Dakota -- Ohio -- Oklahoma -- Oregon -- South Carolina -- South Dakota -- Tennessee -- Texas -- Utah -- Virginia -- Wisconsin -- State "Civil Union" Laws -- Congressional Activity -- Conclusion -- End Notes -- Homosexuals and the U.S. Military: Current Issues -- Summary -- Background and Analysis -- Discharge Statistics -- Issues -- Legal Challenges -- Actions Following the Murder of Private Barry Winchell -- Recruiting, JROTC, ROTC and Campus Policies -- High Schools -- Colleges and Universities -- Supreme Court Review of the Solomon Amendment -- Homosexuals and Marriages -- Foreign Military Experiences -- End Notes -- Chapter Sources -- Index.

Same-sex parented family research and academic literature has focused primarily on intact families and/or those created after a heterosexual divorce–their family models, methods of family creation and the fertility process, and the health and well-being of their children. Similarly, separation and divorce research and academic literature has focused primarily on opposite-sex parented families. To date, limited research has explored the experiences of same-sex parents who separated after having children within their relationship. This article reports on findings from a qualitative study of semi-structured in-depth interviews with 22 same-sex parents in Australia who had experienced parental separation and aims to contribute to a new phase of same-sex relationship and parenting research that explores divorce and separation. Participants were acutely aware that their separation and post-separation families troubled the social expectations and mores of the same-sex parented family by appearing to break unwritten rules, threatening to disrupt campaigns for social and political acceptance, and falling off an apparent pedestal that their families and relationships had been placed on. Separated same-sex parents were also concerned that their families would disrupt efforts to achieve social and political acceptance–and this created challenges with recruitment and interviewing techniques with male participants in particular. This article will demonstrate the pressure for same-sex parents to present an idyllic image of family. It will also discuss how, as a consequence of being seen as troubling, same-sex parental separation created experiences of isolation and invisibility for parents during and after their separation.

As the uproar over the recent New York State law demonstrates, same-sex marriage is a perennial hot-button issue, certain to impact the 2012 election. This book provides a useful roadmap to both sides of this contentious matter. Taking a 'point/counterpoint' approach, the authors consider key questions about the institution itself: What is marriage for? Is marriage meant to be a gendered institution? Why is the state in the business of sanctioning marriage? Where do the needs of children fit in? Will legalisation of same-sex marriage lead to legalisation of polygamy?

Same-sex marriages are currently not permitted under Australian federal law. Although same-sex couples in de facto relationships have had most of the legal rights of married couples since July 2009, there is however no national registered partnership or civil union scheme. Public opinion polls in Australia consistently show majority support for same-sex marriage, yet political and legal opposition to it has stymied a number of recent attempts at state and federal level to legislate for 'marriage equality', which would require amending the federal Marriage Act. Should marriage only be between a