Suchergebnisse

Study purpose is to determine the signs of legal security on the basis of existing scientific views and current legislation, excluding its overly broad understanding, leading to the fact that any legal requirement is included in the content of national security. Methodology: the basis is the dialectical method of cognition of the facts of social reality, on which the formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. The methods of analysis and synthesis, abstraction, deduction and induction have found their application both individually and as part of other methods. Main content. We analyzed the features of legal security: normative; legal system stability; focus on eliminating legal threats and others, as well as criticized the widespread understanding of legal security as a form of national security. Conclusions. It is proved that it is necessary to distinguish between such phenomena as legal security and legal security as a form of national security, while the latter is part of legal security. In general, the entire block of legal security is not included in the content of national security.

The sphere of security plays an important role in the domestic and foreign policy of states. In this regard, the object of the study were security threats that determine stability in Ukraine and Pakistan. The authors used the method of comparative analysis to draw parallels between the security of Ukraine and Pakistan and identify possible ways to improve it. It is concluded that, both Ukraine and Pakistan are quite geopolitically distant, have different histories and state-building processes, but are affected by traditional and "non-traditional" security threats. Definitely, the main unifying factor for the states is the antagonistic or "enemy" state - India for Pakistan and Russia for Ukraine, which becomes a catalyst for the formation of national identity and unity of society. The conflicts in Pakistan (Kashmir, Baluchistan and Pashtunistan) and Ukraine (war in Donbass, illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation) have had common consequences and mechanisms for overcoming them, which are implemented in the context of the internal and state policy of both Kiev and Islamabad.

This article examines the recent history of Colombia from the perspective of security -understood as a political and multidimensional issue. It analyses primarily the tendency to militarize security and the consequences this brings to democracy, but touches upon other dimensions of security as well. It starts in the mid-Twentieth Century with the professionalization of the military forces and the development of military autonomy in the handling of public order. However, most of the article deals with the policy of Democratic Security developed by Alvaro Uribe's administration, and includes the changes brought about by Juan Manuel Santos' the first year of government. The article ends by identifying some challenges to security today. ; Este artículo recorre la historia contemporánea del país desde el ángulo de la seguridad, entendida como un asunto político pluridimensional. Su eje es la tendencia de militarización de la seguridad y sus consecuencias para la democracia. En él se incorporan otras dimensiones según lo requiera el análisis. La profesionalización militar y el desarrollo de la autonomía militar en el manejo del orden público, durante las décadas de mediados del siglo pasado, son la base del análisis de fondo. Éste se centra en los altibajos de la política de Seguridad Democrática del gobierno de Álvaro Uribe y termina con lo ocurrido en materia de seguridad durante el primer año del gobierno de Juan Manuel Santos. El artículo finaliza identificando algunos desafíos de la seguridad en la actualidad.

The goal of the article is to identify cybersecurity issues as a component of national security and suggest ways to solve them. The topic of the research is the cyber security of Ukraine. In the course of the research, the following methods were used: dialectical method, formal and legal method, comparative-legal method and scientific abstraction method. As a result, the legal acts governing cybersecurity in Ukraine are analyzed, the cyber security actors are determined and their functions are defined. Practical implementation. There is a need to establish and implement an annual plan for the implementation of the Cyber Security Strategy, which should detail the actions to ensure cyber security, identify specific measures, deadlines and responsible actors. It is concluded that, ways to improve the cybersecurity system (as part of national security), which will update the legal mechanisms of cybersecurity, create cybersecurity infrastructure at the global level, establish effective interaction between cybersecurity actors regardless of their departmental affiliation and / or form of ownership, including with the owners of critical infrastructure and non-state owned information), are in their primary phase.