Suchergebnisse

Presented on 15 May 2013 at the Policy Science Department Study Day of the University of Liège (Belgium). Security is both ubiquitous in public discourse and focused on criminal insecurity. Other uncertainties are largely concealed, such as health, housing, employment, normativity, affectivity or the environment. It is this configuration, between obsession and discursive focus, that will attract our attention. It seems to us that the security discourse has developed alongside another, broader one, which we call a mobilitarian ideology, based on the promotion of mobility for itself. Physical, professional, social, emotional or even religious or philosophical, mobility is seen as a positive value. In a society that perceives itself constantly and infinite, immobility is a mistake and mobility is the only salvage board for those who want to stay synchronous with their environment. Through the imperatives of activity, activation, participation and adaptation, the underlying ideology is pushing for widespread and unintended movement. Stability, consistency is presented as a barrier to access to perfect autonomy and freedom. Geographical anchoring, stable employment, permanence of couple and family, religious and philosophical affiliations and lifestyles are therefore unacceptable constraints. This discourse can be read as a valorisation of insecurity: as all the coordinates of the report to the world are constantly changing, it is no longer possible to rely on certainty, ensure safe zones and periods of safety. The imperative of mobility is therefore an imperative of insecurity. We will argue that it is in the mirror of this pressing ideology that a commitment to criminal insecurity is developing, both exuperating the anxieties caused by omnimobilisation and pushing it up, making it possible to continue to assert the legitimacy of mobility by a constituency of insecurity with its criminal dimension. ; Présenté le 15 mai 2013 lors de la journée d'étude du département de science politique de l'Université de Liège ...

The economic growth of the private security sector has been relatively important during the 70s. This rapid but uncontrolled development has however generated important problems implicating private security personnel. In order to respond to these problems, the legislator was forced to regulate the sector through the law of July 12th 1983. Thirty years later, the 1983 law remains the sector's rules of reference. Today, threats on modern societies have evolved and become more violent. Furthermore, due to a lack of economic resources, public authorities have reduced the range of security mission they'll undertake to focus solely on high priority issues. As a consequence, new responsibilities have been transferred to private security actors. In this context, the safeguard of individual liberties appears has an important topic. For example, private security agents operating at airports have been granted rights (body check and luggage searches) that interfere with people's freedom. To regulate the sector's development, the legislator has created a structure to control these activities. Despite this effort, regulations remains insufficient especially has more missions are transferred by the State to private security actors. As a result, reinforcing training programs for these private actors constitute an important step towards maintaining people's rights. It is the reason behind the Legislator decision to include training programs in book VI of domestic security laws. Today, private security actors participate actively in domestic security missions alongside public security forces while respecting individual liberties. ; La sécurité privée a connu un développement économique relativement important dans les années 70. Cette montée en puissance incontrôlée a généré des faits graves impliquant des agents de sécurité privée. C'est à la suite de ces évènements que le législateur a été contraint de réguler une première fois cette activité par la loi du 12 juillet 1983. Cette loi reste 30 ans plus tard, la réglementation de ...

The economic growth of the private security sector has been relatively important during the 70s. This rapid but uncontrolled development has however generated important problems implicating private security personnel. In order to respond to these problems, the legislator was forced to regulate the sector through the law of July 12th 1983. Thirty years later, the 1983 law remains the sector's rules of reference. Today, threats on modern societies have evolved and become more violent. Furthermore, due to a lack of economic resources, public authorities have reduced the range of security mission they'll undertake to focus solely on high priority issues. As a consequence, new responsibilities have been transferred to private security actors. In this context, the safeguard of individual liberties appears has an important topic. For example, private security agents operating at airports have been granted rights (body check and luggage searches) that interfere with people's freedom. To regulate the sector's development, the legislator has created a structure to control these activities. Despite this effort, regulations remains insufficient especially has more missions are transferred by the State to private security actors. As a result, reinforcing training programs for these private actors constitute an important step towards maintaining people's rights. It is the reason behind the Legislator decision to include training programs in book VI of domestic security laws. Today, private security actors participate actively in domestic security missions alongside public security forces while respecting individual liberties. ; La sécurité privée a connu un développement économique relativement important dans les années 70. Cette montée en puissance incontrôlée a généré des faits graves impliquant des agents de sécurité privée. C'est à la suite de ces évènements que le législateur a été contraint de réguler une première fois cette activité par la loi du 12 juillet 1983. Cette loi reste 30 ans plus tard, la réglementation de ...

The economic growth of the private security sector has been relatively important during the 70s. This rapid but uncontrolled development has however generated important problems implicating private security personnel. In order to respond to these problems, the legislator was forced to regulate the sector through the law of July 12th 1983. Thirty years later, the 1983 law remains the sector's rules of reference. Today, threats on modern societies have evolved and become more violent. Furthermore, due to a lack of economic resources, public authorities have reduced the range of security mission they'll undertake to focus solely on high priority issues. As a consequence, new responsibilities have been transferred to private security actors. In this context, the safeguard of individual liberties appears has an important topic. For example, private security agents operating at airports have been granted rights (body check and luggage searches) that interfere with people's freedom. To regulate the sector's development, the legislator has created a structure to control these activities. Despite this effort, regulations remains insufficient especially has more missions are transferred by the State to private security actors. As a result, reinforcing training programs for these private actors constitute an important step towards maintaining people's rights. It is the reason behind the Legislator decision to include training programs in book VI of domestic security laws. Today, private security actors participate actively in domestic security missions alongside public security forces while respecting individual liberties. ; La sécurité privée a connu un développement économique relativement important dans les années 70. Cette montée en puissance incontrôlée a généré des faits graves impliquant des agents de sécurité privée. C'est à la suite de ces évènements que le législateur a été contraint de réguler une première fois cette activité par la loi du 12 juillet 1983. Cette loi reste 30 ans plus tard, la réglementation de ...

The economic growth of the private security sector has been relatively important during the 70s. This rapid but uncontrolled development has however generated important problems implicating private security personnel. In order to respond to these problems, the legislator was forced to regulate the sector through the law of July 12th 1983. Thirty years later, the 1983 law remains the sector's rules of reference. Today, threats on modern societies have evolved and become more violent. Furthermore, due to a lack of economic resources, public authorities have reduced the range of security mission they'll undertake to focus solely on high priority issues. As a consequence, new responsibilities have been transferred to private security actors. In this context, the safeguard of individual liberties appears has an important topic. For example, private security agents operating at airports have been granted rights (body check and luggage searches) that interfere with people's freedom. To regulate the sector's development, the legislator has created a structure to control these activities. Despite this effort, regulations remains insufficient especially has more missions are transferred by the State to private security actors. As a result, reinforcing training programs for these private actors constitute an important step towards maintaining people's rights. It is the reason behind the Legislator decision to include training programs in book VI of domestic security laws. Today, private security actors participate actively in domestic security missions alongside public security forces while respecting individual liberties. ; La sécurité privée a connu un développement économique relativement important dans les années 70. Cette montée en puissance incontrôlée a généré des faits graves impliquant des agents de sécurité privée. C'est à la suite de ces évènements que le législateur a été contraint de réguler une première fois cette activité par la loi du 12 juillet 1983. Cette loi reste 30 ans plus tard, la réglementation de ...

Short presentation of security policies in France since the early 2000s and prospects for possible policies in the second decade of the same century. ; International audience ; Short presentation of security policies in France since the early 2000s and prospects for possible policies in the second decade of the same century. ; Présentation succincte des politiques de sécurité menées en France depuis le début des années 2000 et perspectives sur les politiques envisageables à l'orée de la deuxième décennie du même siècle.

This number is a special number. It is a kind of transition number. A new drafting team was set up with the new responsibilities of Laurent Bonelli as Secretary-General of the Centre and the installation of the magazine on the premises of Paris-Ouest-Nanterre. The team of associated editors expanded to Christian Olsson and Philippe Bonditti. Blaise Magnin and Karel Yon replaced Estelle Durand, Aurélie Veyron Churlet and Pauline Vermeren as drafting team. We are delighted that they both agreed to join us and put their enthusiasm and skills in the review, at a time when the financial difficulties caused by the policy of various ministries in that government to cut off the sources of funding for social science journals, particularly the most critical ones, were particularly felt, forcing us to separate us from the very professional employees we had previously (.). ; Ce numéro est un numéro particulier. C'est en quelque sorte un numéro de transition. Une nouvelle équipe de rédaction se met en place avec les nouvelles responsabilités de Laurent Bonelli comme secrétaire général du centre et l'installation de la revue dans les locaux de Paris-Ouest-Nanterre. L'équipe de rédacteurs associés s'élargit à Christian Olsson et Philippe Bonditti. Blaise Magnin et Karel Yon remplacent Estelle Durand, Aurélie Veyron Churlet et Pauline Vermeren comme équipe de rédaction. Nous sommes ravis qu'ils aient tous deux accepté de nous rejoindre et de mettre leur enthousiasme et leurs compétences dans la revue, au moment où les difficultés financières dues à la politique de différents ministères de ce gouvernement de couper les sources de financement des revues de sciences sociales, en particulier les plus critiques, s'est fait particulièrement sentir, nous obligeant à nous séparer des personnes salariées très professionnelles que nous avions auparavant (.).

Peace-building between Palestinians and Israelis has failed so far because of dis-synergetic international efforts as focus has shifted away from the political issues laying at the heart of the conflict to "security issues". Building conceptually on "human security" approaches, this article will contend that no sustainable peace is possible if political "root causes" are not addressed and if "security" is only attached to Israelis.

Peace-building between Palestinians and Israelis has failed so far because of dis-synergetic international efforts as focus has shifted away from the political issues laying at the heart of the conflict to "security issues". Building conceptually on "human security" approaches, this article will contend that no sustainable peace is possible if political "root causes" are not addressed and if "security" is only attached to Israelis.

International audience ; To Fulani herders of Senegalese Ferlo, socio-economic and symbolic links between settlements and cattle encounter significative change, with an increasing economic part played by small ruminants, not taking over but rather complementing the cultural references and strategies represented by cattle. Various rules of management are linked to specific strategies.

International audience ; To Fulani herders of Senegalese Ferlo, socio-economic and symbolic links between settlements and cattle encounter significative change, with an increasing economic part played by small ruminants, not taking over but rather complementing the cultural references and strategies represented by cattle. Various rules of management are linked to specific strategies. ; Chez les pasteurs peuls du Ferlo, les liens socio-économiques et symboliques entre le campement et son troupeau bovin connaissent de grands changements, marqués notamment par le rôle économique croissant des petits ruminants. Différents modes de gestion se mettent en place qui renvoient à des stratégies de protection contre les risques.

International audience To Fulani herders of Senegalese Ferlo, socio-economic and symbolic links between settlements and cattle encounter significative change, with an increasing economic part played by small ruminants, not taking over but rather complementing the cultural references and strategies represented by cattle. Various rules of management are linked to specific strategies.

International audience ; To Fulani herders of Senegalese Ferlo, socio-economic and symbolic links between settlements and cattle encounter significative change, with an increasing economic part played by small ruminants, not taking over but rather complementing the cultural references and strategies represented by cattle. Various rules of management are linked to specific strategies. ; Chez les pasteurs peuls du Ferlo, les liens socio-économiques et symboliques entre le campement et son troupeau bovin connaissent de grands changements, marqués notamment par le rôle économique croissant des petits ruminants. Différents modes de gestion se mettent en place qui renvoient à des stratégies de protection contre les risques.

Les infrastructures et réseaux critiques commencent à s'ouvrir vers des architectures, protocoles et applications vulnérables. Ainsi, non seulement il est question de sécuriser ces applications (e.g., contre les attaques potentielles), mais il faut également justifier notre confiance dans les mécanismes de sécurité déployés. Pour cela, nous présentons PolyOrBAC, un cadriciel basé sur le modèle de contrôle d'accès OrBAC, les mécanismes de services Web ainsi que les contrats électroniques. Ensuite, nous préconisons l'utilisation de la Programmation Logique par Contraintes (PLC) pour détecter et résoudre les conflits éventuels dans la politique de sécurité. Au niveau de la mise en œuvre, nous proposons le protocole Q-ESP, notre amélioration d'IPSec qui assure à la fois des besoins de sécurité et de QoS. Enfin, nous présentons nos modèles et résultats de test et d'évaluation d'outils de sécurité notamment les Systèmes de Détection d'Intrusions (IDS).

Les infrastructures et réseaux critiques commencent à s'ouvrir vers des architectures, protocoles et applications vulnérables. Ainsi, non seulement il est question de sécuriser ces applications (e.g., contre les attaques potentielles), mais il faut également justifier notre confiance dans les mécanismes de sécurité déployés. Pour cela, nous présentons PolyOrBAC, un cadriciel basé sur le modèle de contrôle d'accès OrBAC, les mécanismes de services Web ainsi que les contrats électroniques. Ensuite, nous préconisons l'utilisation de la Programmation Logique par Contraintes (PLC) pour détecter et résoudre les conflits éventuels dans la politique de sécurité. Au niveau de la mise en œuvre, nous proposons le protocole Q-ESP, notre amélioration d'IPSec qui assure à la fois des besoins de sécurité et de QoS. Enfin, nous présentons nos modèles et résultats de test et d'évaluation d'outils de sécurité notamment les Systèmes de Détection d'Intrusions (IDS).