Voter Turnout. A Social Theory of Political Participation
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 64, Heft 6, S. 1238-1240
ISSN: 0035-2950
3934 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 64, Heft 6, S. 1238-1240
ISSN: 0035-2950
La recherche est souvent affaire de cycles et de redécouvertes. Ce livre n'échappe pas à cette logique. À l'instar d'Alan Zuckerman qui s'intéresse aux logiques sociales du politique ou de Céline Braconnier1 qui insiste sur l'importance des groupes d'appartenance primaire des individus pour saisir leurs comportements électoraux, le travail de Meredith Rolfe vise à resocialiser l'individu, ici quand il s'agit d'aller voter. Pour l'auteure, il faut sortir d'une analyse atomistique, qu'elle soit centrée sur le calcul des coûts ou des bénéfices (Anthony Downs), ou bien des ressources civiques, afin de proposer une « théorie sociale » de la participation électorale [Premier paragraphe].
BASE
La recherche est souvent affaire de cycles et de redécouvertes. Ce livre n'échappe pas à cette logique. À l'instar d'Alan Zuckerman qui s'intéresse aux logiques sociales du politique ou de Céline Braconnier1 qui insiste sur l'importance des groupes d'appartenance primaire des individus pour saisir leurs comportements électoraux, le travail de Meredith Rolfe vise à resocialiser l'individu, ici quand il s'agit d'aller voter. Pour l'auteure, il faut sortir d'une analyse atomistique, qu'elle soit centrée sur le calcul des coûts ou des bénéfices (Anthony Downs), ou bien des ressources civiques, afin de proposer une « théorie sociale » de la participation électorale [Premier paragraphe].
BASE
La recherche est souvent affaire de cycles et de redécouvertes. Ce livre n'échappe pas à cette logique. À l'instar d'Alan Zuckerman qui s'intéresse aux logiques sociales du politique ou de Céline Braconnier1 qui insiste sur l'importance des groupes d'appartenance primaire des individus pour saisir leurs comportements électoraux, le travail de Meredith Rolfe vise à resocialiser l'individu, ici quand il s'agit d'aller voter. Pour l'auteure, il faut sortir d'une analyse atomistique, qu'elle soit centrée sur le calcul des coûts ou des bénéfices (Anthony Downs), ou bien des ressources civiques, afin de proposer une « théorie sociale » de la participation électorale [Premier paragraphe].
BASE
In: Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales: revue internationale de systémique complexe et d'études relationnelles, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 233
ISSN: 1918-7475
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
The aim of the article is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, and the epistemological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. In light of the "peripheral" concerns, the aim of the paper is to identify and critically assess the meta-methodological principles of the contemporary sociological theory. The article focuses on the relations between sociology, society, modernization, and globalization, including the "borderline" Lithuanian case. In the later analysis, the paper focuses on the differences of social theory and sociological theory, the sociological forms and the criteria of their differentiation. The article attempts to provide an understanding of the conceptual connections between social theory and political philosophy. Although the concept of "theory" has deep roots in the professional discourses of East European intellectuals, sociological theory finds itself in a position where it cannot significantly affect the socio-political intellectual agenda. Moreover, the theoretical sociology more and more is identified with the role of the 'under laborer'. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the deterministic scheme of the old (Soviet) historicism corresponds to the optimistic perspective of the new (Western) historicism. The article points out to an urgent need to re-think the perspectives of sociological theory for contemporary times. The article concludes with discussion of criteria in the assessment of status and value of theoretical sociology.
BASE
In: ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 207-222
How to theorize communication in social sciences? This text has two goals. First, to rely on the work of Louis Quéré, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of the two dominant models of two dominant models: an epistemological model enrolling the theory of information and cybernetics in an instrumental aim; a political model that aims at inter-understanding at the service of self-determination of the citizens in the elaboration of norms that govern them. Moreover, we wish to add to this review, two models which go beyond the limits of the first two approaches: a praxeological model that relies on praxis as an organizing activity of shared perspectives; a model of incommunication that reverses the situation and makes the impossibility of achieving intercomprehension the norm.
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 94-98
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Revue économique, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 615
ISSN: 1950-6694
In: Méthod(e)s: African review of social sciences methodology, Band 1, Heft 1-2, S. 131-146
ISSN: 2375-4753