Major Social Problems.Rudolph M. Binder
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 27, Heft 6, S. 806-807
ISSN: 1537-5390
1765 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 27, Heft 6, S. 806-807
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 26, Heft 5, S. 652-653
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Affilia: journal of women and social work, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 23-43
ISSN: 1552-3020
The current effort to use social policy to restore the traditional nuclear family reflects deep-seated fears about the changing structure of the middle-class family, as well as distrust of the caretaking capacity of the poor. The concepts of the family ethic and social reproduction are used to examine and explain the cutbacks in social welfare and the state's increasingly punitive treatment of poor women and their families.
In: Human relations: towards the integration of the social sciences, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 111-125
ISSN: 1573-9716, 1741-282X
The sectarian Amana Society of Iowa existed for 89 years as a communal enterprise. In 1932, for a combination of reasons, the Society abandoned communalism and reorganized as a joint-stock corporation. The reasons for the change are discussed in terms of double-bind theory. It is argued that all members faced a conflict between the demands of the sect's plan for salvation and the group's economic dependence on external markets. In addition, the elders experienced a second bind between preserving the community and upholding its rules. The stresses in the Society were resolved through reorganization.
In: Empan, Band 120, Heft 4, S. 50-57
La souffrance au travail des cadres de direction des centres sociaux est récurrente et menace de les enfermer dans un aveuglement cognitif les éloignant de leur mission initiale. Comment allier politiques managériales de la Fédération et pratiques sur le terrain ? Comment interagir dans un collectif de contraintes et de points de vue sans se perdre soi-même ? Quels sont les risques psychosociaux engendrés par toute la complexité de la bureaucratisation, la difficulté organisationnelle, les perpétuelles réformes administratives, le devoir de performance ?
"What does friendship have to do with racial difference, settler colonialism and post-apartheid South Africa? While histories of apartheid and colonialism in South Africa have often focused on the ideologies of segregation and white supremacy, Ties that Bind explores how the intimacies of friendship create vital spaces for practices of power and resistance. Combining interviews, history poetry, visual arts, memoir and academic essay, the collection keeps alive the promise of friendship and its possibilities while investigating how affective relations are essential to the social reproduction of power. From the intimacy of personal relationships to the organising ideology of liberal colonial governance, the contributors explore the intersection of race and friendship from a kaleidoscope of viewpoints and scales. Insisting on a timeline that originates in settler colonialism, Ties that Bind uncovers the implication of anti-Blackness within nonracialism, and powerfully challenges a simple reading of the Mandela moment and the rainbow nation. In the wake of countrywide student protests calling for decolonization of the university, and reignited debates around racial inequality, this timely volume insists that the history of South African politics has always already been about friendship. Written in an accessible and engaging style, Ties that Bind will interest a wide audience of scholars, students, and activists, as well as general readers curious about contemporary South African debates around race and intimacy"--Amazon
In: Political behavior, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 53
ISSN: 0190-9320
International audience ; Critical literature has questioned British state-sponsored multiculturalism's capacity to confront racism and facilitate cross-community alliances; instead, multiculturalism is perceived to constitute groups in ethnically defined communities and essentialist cultures. Exploring two ethnographic examples — an Irish arts centre and St Patrick's Day — this article considers attempts by the London-Irish to make Irishness inclusive and to create cross-community alliances under government-sponsored `multicultural' initiatives. Invoking Bateson's `doublebind', I argue multiculturalism is characterized by a paradoxical injunction that curbs the possibility for `ethnic minorities' to withdraw from their circumscribed status. On the one hand, groups such as the Irish are often encouraged, within multiculturalism, to make their cultures inclusive in order to contribute towards a celebration of `cosmopolitan' diversity; on the other, it is explicitly forbidden to threaten their particularism; to do so would threaten their claim to resources as a distinctive group.
BASE
In: Ethnicities, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 177-198
Critical literature has questioned British state-sponsored multiculturalism's capacity to confront racism and facilitate cross-community alliances; instead, multiculturalism is perceived to constitute groups in ethnically defined communities and essentialist cultures. Exploring two ethnographic examples — an Irish arts centre and St Patrick's Day — this article considers attempts by the London-Irish to make Irishness inclusive and to create cross-community alliances under government-sponsored `multicultural' initiatives. Invoking Bateson's `doublebind', I argue multiculturalism is characterized by a paradoxical injunction that curbs the possibility for `ethnic minorities' to withdraw from their circumscribed status. On the one hand, groups such as the Irish are often encouraged, within multiculturalism, to make their cultures inclusive in order to contribute towards a celebration of `cosmopolitan' diversity; on the other, it is explicitly forbidden to threaten their particularism; to do so would threaten their claim to resources as a distinctive group.
In: Social text, Band 23, Heft 3-4, S. 57-68
ISSN: 1527-1951
In: Social dynamics: SD ; a journal of the Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 197-217
ISSN: 1940-7874
In: Zugl.: Marriage and family review, Vol. 5, no. 4
In: The marriage and family review series
In: Social text, Heft 2, S. 133
ISSN: 1527-1951
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 885-920
ISSN: 1939-9162
Intraparty caucuses in the US Congress are often recognized for the information sharing, voting blocs, and personal relationships they facilitate. This article introduces an additional benefit to joining intraparty caucuses: campaign donations. Applying social network analysis and exponential random graph models to the 115th and 116th Congresses, I find that members are more likely to donate to their fellow caucus members than other members in Congress. In addition, I find that party leaders, particularly Republican party leaders, are less likely to donate to members that join intraparty caucuses, indicating that Leadership PAC funding is strategic for rank‐and‐file members and party leaders alike. This article adds to our understanding of intraparty caucuses, particularly their role in facilitating member‐to‐member campaign donations, and the relationship between caucus members and party leaders.