Suchergebnisse

У статті охарактеризовані значимі фактори трансформації сучасних уявлень про зміну ціннісних орієнтацій особистості у нашій державі. На думку автора до них належать: нівеляція українськості, повільне формування громадянського суспільства, української політичної нації та модерної української ідентичності, незавершеність українського державо- та націєтворення, процесів постколоніальногo самовизначення як окремого громадянина, так і українського народу в цілому, боротьба за втілення в життя демократичних принципів гідності в суспільстві, відкидання духовних цінностей людини в сучасному соціумі, події, пов'язані з агресією Росії в нашій державі.Проаналізовано деякі сучасні погляди на гідність людини після подій 2014-го року, досліджено роль гідності в сучасному українському соціумі. Автор вказує на ключове місце гідності серед людських цінностей, називаючи її однією з основних засад організації суспільства. У дослідженні розкриваються основні гасла періоду Революції Гідності в Україні, прояви гідності особистості в українському соціумі під час відбору до Євробачення-2019. ; The article describes the significant factors of transformation of modern ideas about the change of value orientations of the individual in our state.According to the author, they include: the leveling of Ukranian culture, the slow formation of civil society, Ukrainian political nation and modern Ukrainian identity, the incompleteness of the Ukrainian state and nation-building of the processes of postcolonial self-determination as an individual citizen and the Ukrainian people in general, the struggle for the implementation of democratic principles of dignity in society, the rejection of the spiritual values of man in modern society, the events associated with the aggression of Russia in our state.Some modern views on the human's dignity after the events of 2014th areanalyzed, the role of dignity in the modern Ukrainian society is investigated. The author points to the key place of dignity among human values, calling it one of the main basic foundations of organization of society. In a research the main slogans of the period of the Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine, manifestations the dignity of the personality in the Ukrainian society during the selection for the Eurovision-2019.

The article describes the significant factors of transformation of modern ideas about the change of value orientations of the individual in our state.According to the author, they include: the leveling of Ukranian culture, the slow formation of civil society, Ukrainian political nation and modern Ukrainian identity, the incompleteness of the Ukrainian state and nation-building of the processes of postcolonial self-determination as an individual citizen and the Ukrainian people in general, the struggle for the implementation of democratic principles of dignity in society, the rejection of the spiritual values of man in modern society, the events associated with the aggression of Russia in our state.Some modern views on the human's dignity after the events of 2014th areanalyzed, the role of dignity in the modern Ukrainian society is investigated. The author points to the key place of dignity among human values, calling it one of the main basic foundations of organization of society. In a research the main slogans of the period of the Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine, manifestations the dignity of the personality in the Ukrainian society during the selection for the Eurovision-2019. ; У статті охарактеризовані значимі фактори трансформації сучасних уявлень про зміну ціннісних орієнтацій особистості у нашій державі. На думку автора до них належать: нівеляція українськості, повільне формування громадянського суспільства, української політичної нації та модерної української ідентичності, незавершеність українського державо- та націєтворення, процесів постколоніальногo самовизначення як окремого громадянина, так і українського народу в цілому, боротьба за втілення в життя демократичних принципів гідності в суспільстві, відкидання духовних цінностей людини в сучасному соціумі, події, пов'язані з агресією Росії в нашій державі.Проаналізовано деякі сучасні погляди на гідність людини після подій 2014-го року, досліджено роль гідності в сучасному українському соціумі. Автор вказує на ключове місце гідності серед людських цінностей, називаючи її однією з основних засад організації суспільства. У дослідженні розкриваються основні гасла періоду Революції Гідності в Україні, прояви гідності особистості в українському соціумі під час відбору до Євробачення-2019.

The article highlights the trend of reinstitutionalisation of propaganda and counter propaganda after a brief historical era of international hiatus in the 1990s when the propaganda-related institutions were dismantled in many countries worldwide. The latter trend is exemplified by a number of processes, including the phenomenon of the Russian propaganda that has evolved after Putin took office, and the emergence of the strategic communications offices in Europe starting from 2015. The revival of propaganda 2.0 is a result of the hybrid wars that have engulfed leading countries worldwide. Propaganda is a systematic effort to manipulate other people's beliefs and spread chaos. Although the current propaganda aims resemble the ones used during the Cold War, the new tech abilities have enhanced its tactics. While the Internet, digitalization and social media platforms offer new opportunities for secret services and relevant experts, the phenomenon of "open consсiousness" allows an average consumer to be unwillingly affected by the messages that contain propaganda. It is argued that counter-propaganda tools should factor in media literacy efforts and building resilience among the general population to withstand disinformation messages. A number of organizations focused at countering propaganda has been created as a means of an institutional solution. Following a watershed moment in Ukraine two relevant organizations were established in 2021: Centre for Countering Disinformation (as part of the National Security and Defense Council) and Centre of Strategic Communications and Information Security (as part of the Ministry of Culture and Information Politics). These organizations aim at carrying out relevant work in line with their EU counterparts.

The article is devoted to the outline and research of several topical critical questions related to the study of the role of the Ukrainian youth in the development of civil society in terms of the undeclared Russian-Ukrainian war and global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as the influence of the civilization borderland factor on the mentality and behavior of borderland residents. The article focuses on the fact that the concurrently multidirectional influences, such as geopolitical, cultural, religious and others, make the borderland a zone of attraction and rejection, as well as the space for large-scale manipulations. The formation of civil society in the borderland area has its own specifics, yet scantily explored in the academic research. Special attention is paid to the increase of the civil society's significance in various spheres from the promotion of reforms at the state level to the voluntary assistance provided to the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the "Joint Forces Operation", internally displaced persons, and other segments of the population. To successfully solve the problem of building the Ukrainian civil society, it is necessary to fundamentally comprehend the youth's participation in the solution of various problems of modern Ukraine. Thus, it is important that young citizens be ready for active cooperation with the state and public organizations. The research emphasizes one of the popular ways to transform young people into active citizens of Ukraine, which consists in their encouragement to participate in the process of building civil society at all levels of the educational process in the educational establishments of our state, Ukrainian weekend schools abroad; involvement in the work of the Young Scholars' Council and various public organizations. This all caused the need to search for fundamentally new approaches to preparing youth for an active life in the Ukrainian society. The author of the article has elucidated the work experience of the scholars of the Research Institute of Ukrainian Studies regarding the effective forms and methods of increasing young people's activity through the prism of academic, cultural, and educational work.

В статье проанализирована роль исторической памяти в мультикультурных обществах. Исследовано соотношение исторической памяти и идентичности как важных составляющих в бесчисленных «войнах памяти», охвативших нынешние мультикультурного общества. Сделан вывод о необходимости смещения полюса изучения с политической истории в направлении социальной и культурной истории, которые в значительной степени примиряют, а не разъединяют мультикультурные общества.Ключевые слова: историческая память, мультикультурализм, коллективная память, Украина. The article analyzes the role of historical memory in multicultural societies. Historical memory in transitive societies plays an ambivalent character. On the one hand, the formation of civil society on a common platform becomes a bridge for the unification of society. On the other hand, in the case of addressing controversial issues in society, an intergenerational / social group gap is formed. Memory is involved in the political struggle, therefore, it is often associated with the influence of the political order in shaping historical knowledge in solving specific political problems.The relationship between historical memory and identity as an important component in the countless "memory wars" that has embraced present-day multicultural societies is researched. It is concluded that there is a need to shift the field of study from political history into the direction of social and cultural history, which largely reconcile rather than disconnect multicultural societies.Historical memory is increasingly used to interpret reality. Reminiscences in multicultural societies can open old wounds and revive divisions of a certain part of society. On the other hand, the periods of intervention, glory and rule can be vulnerable, since they allow us to characterize the attitude towards neighbors, which will not promote tolerance and peace. The growth of nationalism in multicultural societies on the basis of the mythologization of historical memory is associated with such manifestation as ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is defined as the tendency and endeavor of man to evaluate all life and cultural phenomena through the prism of his ethnic group, which is the criterion of the most perfect in all respects. As a consequence, the spread of manifestations of "multicultural blindness" and micro-conflicts on an inter-ethnic basis are becomingKey words: historical memory, multiculturalism, collective memory, Ukraine. ; В статті проаналізовано роль історичної пам'яті в мультикультурних суспільствах. Досліджено співвідношення історичної пам'яті та ідентичності як важливих складових в незліченних «війнах пам'яті», що охопили нинішні мультикультурні суспільства. Зроблено висновок щодо необхідності зміщення полюсу вивчення з політичної історії в напрямку соціальної та культурної історії, які в значній мірі примирюють, а не роз'єднують мультикультурні суспільства.Ключові слова: історична пам'ять, мультикультуралізм, колективна пам'ять, Україна. В статье проанализирована роль исторической памяти в мультикультурных обществах. Исследовано соотношение исторической памяти и идентичности как важных составляющих в бесчисленных «войнах памяти», охвативших нынешние мультикультурного общества. Сделан вывод о необходимости смещения полюса изучения с политической истории в направлении социальной и культурной истории, которые в значительной степени примиряют, а не разъединяют мультикультурные общества.Ключевые слова: историческая память, мультикультурализм, коллективная память, Украина. The article analyzes the role of historical memory in multicultural societies. Historical memory in transitive societies plays an ambivalent character. On the one hand, the formation of civil society on a common platform becomes a bridge for the unification of society. On the other hand, in the case of addressing controversial issues in society, an intergenerational / social group gap is formed. Memory is involved in the political struggle, therefore, it is often associated with the influence of the political order in shaping historical knowledge in solving specific political problems.The relationship between historical memory and identity as an important component in the countless "memory wars" that has embraced present-day multicultural societies is researched. It is concluded that there is a need to shift the field of study from political history into the direction of social and cultural history, which largely reconcile rather than disconnect multicultural societies.Historical memory is increasingly used to interpret reality. Reminiscences in multicultural societies can open old wounds and revive divisions of a certain part of society. On the other hand, the periods of intervention, glory and rule can be vulnerable, since they allow us to characterize the attitude towards neighbors, which will not promote tolerance and peace. The growth of nationalism in multicultural societies on the basis of the mythologization of historical memory is associated with such manifestation as ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is defined as the tendency and endeavor of man to evaluate all life and cultural phenomena through the prism of his ethnic group, which is the criterion of the most perfect in all respects. As a consequence, the spread of manifestations of "multicultural blindness" and micro-conflicts on an inter-ethnic basis are becomingKey words: historical memory, multiculturalism, collective memory, Ukraine.

The return of the state to sociological discourse can be based on the study of the role of state measures in societies that overcome the consequences of violence. The purpose of the article – is to outline the problems and some ways of overcoming them facing the state in the post-conflict reconstruction of society and can be successfully addressed by state authorities with varying degrees of success.Given that the state in a post-conflict society, as a rule, has a low level of public confidence and limited resources to resolve the conflict, the practice of peacekeeping operations and other organizational arrangements for building peace is widespread.In addition to the organizational component, the assistance of the Western world is in promoting and sometimes imposing in the transitional societies the legal norms and political institutions of the "old world", which often complicated the peace process and did not take into account the local context of peace-building. In addition, the speed at which international donors wanted to obtain a result from international intervention could contradict the long-term process of psychosocial and economic recovery of victims of the conflict.Modern theories of "transitional justice" try to overcome the contradiction between the limited support of international actors on the one hand and the fragility of the state and the weakness of civil society on the other.The researchers are proposing a model where the state interacts with civil society on the path to peace in the long run and reconciliation.A decentralized transitional justice model emerged in Northern Ireland, where local conciliation initia- tives combined community efforts and government and non-governmental interventions. Particular emphasis on overcoming the effects of violence is on reparations. However, there is no unambiguous universal form of payment to victims of the conflict to meet all economic needs. Reparations can take different forms – from money to symbolic ones. In addition, the decision to pay reparations is implemented by the state on the basis of agreements at the level of institutes of transitional justice, first of all, the truth-establishing commissions.In order to overcome the consequences of violence and the post-conflict reconstruction of a society, the state must take into account the whole range of social problems – political, socio-psychological, and economic. The solution to political problems is through the provision of broad political rights and ensuring the inclusiveness of social groups in society. Socio-psychological problems are solved in particular through the transformation of the group identity of the oppositional conflicts of social groups in the context of the exchange of social experience. Economic issues of post-conflict reconstruction concern the development of an effective reparation system at the individual, group and national levels. ; Стаття стосується спектра державних заходів щодо подолання наслідків насилля в процесі постконфліктного відновлення. Розкриваються соціально-політичні, соціально-психологічні та соціально-економічні особливості державної політики в постконфліктних суспільствах.

The return of the state to sociological discourse can be based on the study of the role of state measures in societies that overcome the consequences of violence. The purpose of the article – is to outline the problems and some ways of overcoming them facing the state in the post-conflict reconstruction of society and can be successfully addressed by state authorities with varying degrees of success.Given that the state in a post-conflict society, as a rule, has a low level of public confidence and limited resources to resolve the conflict, the practice of peacekeeping operations and other organizational arrangements for building peace is widespread.In addition to the organizational component, the assistance of the Western world is in promoting and sometimes imposing in the transitional societies the legal norms and political institutions of the "old world", which often complicated the peace process and did not take into account the local context of peace-building. In addition, the speed at which international donors wanted to obtain a result from international intervention could contradict the long-term process of psychosocial and economic recovery of victims of the conflict.Modern theories of "transitional justice" try to overcome the contradiction between the limited support of international actors on the one hand and the fragility of the state and the weakness of civil society on the other.The researchers are proposing a model where the state interacts with civil society on the path to peace in the long run and reconciliation.A decentralized transitional justice model emerged in Northern Ireland, where local conciliation initia- tives combined community efforts and government and non-governmental interventions. Particular emphasis on overcoming the effects of violence is on reparations. However, there is no unambiguous universal form of payment to victims of the conflict to meet all economic needs. Reparations can take different forms – from money to symbolic ones. In addition, the decision to pay reparations is implemented by the state on the basis of agreements at the level of institutes of transitional justice, first of all, the truth-establishing commissions.In order to overcome the consequences of violence and the post-conflict reconstruction of a society, the state must take into account the whole range of social problems – political, socio-psychological, and economic. The solution to political problems is through the provision of broad political rights and ensuring the inclusiveness of social groups in society. Socio-psychological problems are solved in particular through the transformation of the group identity of the oppositional conflicts of social groups in the context of the exchange of social experience. Economic issues of post-conflict reconstruction concern the development of an effective reparation system at the individual, group and national levels. ; Стаття стосується спектра державних заходів щодо подолання наслідків насилля в процесі постконфліктного відновлення. Розкриваються соціально-політичні, соціально-психологічні та соціально-економічні особливості державної політики в постконфліктних суспільствах.

The article offers an analysis of the main trends in the development of historical education as an important component of the educational process in the higher school of Ukraine at the beginning of the 21st century. The problematic issues of transformation in the sphere of teaching of historical disciplines at the present stage are determined. Separately, the specific characteristics of teaching «History of Ukraine» in technical universities are examined. The authors consider the modernization of learning process in the institutions of higher education of Ukraine as a dialectic issue containing certain risks for humanities' component of bachelors' and masters' preparation. Important stages of this process were the events of 2009, 2014 and 2015. They demonstrated the fundamental divergence of views on the ways of higher schools' reforming in Ukraine of the most part of humanities' academic community on the one hand, and state bureaucracy on the other. The public debate on the role of historical disciplines in the preparation of modern graduates of higher schools of Ukraine revealed a number of pedagogical, didactical and methodological
problems. Foremost among these was recognized the challenge of distinguishing between secondary and higher school courses of «History of Ukraine». The subject of intense discussion is the mechanism for the enforcement of the problem and dialogical methods to the teaching process of the institutions of higher education. In the end, the conclusion was made according the aspiration of the senior management of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine to cut back as short as possible schedule of hours for humanities in the institutions of higher education (especially in the technical and military universities) can have serious social and political consequences. Ignoring the importance of the discipline «History of Ukraine» in developing of the technical students' and cadets' world view in the conditions of the «hybrid war» could become an essential precondition for defeat the informational war by Ukraine. Authors are emphasizing on attention that among the political elite of Ukraine dominate technocratic understanding of term «information security». As a result, historical disciplines are turning into outsiders of educational process thus making it more difficult to consolidate Ukrainian society in the period of the serious military-political crisis.

This paper focuses on the political language symbolism used during the political protests in Ukraine (in 1990, 2000-2001, 2004, 2013-14). Firstly, author discusses the strategies used by the slogan writes during the political protests and shows that they were aimed at mobilizing civil consensus. Secondly, author is interested in the evolution of the language produced during the ongoing protest in Ukraine, and how it delineates the space for the expression of political agenda.

Introduction. The current stage of development of Ukraine – a thorny way of establishment of a democratic state, the main objective of which is to create appropriate conditions for the fullness vital activity and creative self-realization of all segments of civil society, in which people with disabilities need a comprehensive attention and care on the part of social institutions. In the history of mankind is accumulated a great diversity of views of humanistic content for disabled persons, that certifies certain level of civilization development of separate countries, empires, unions and the international community as a whole.Purpose of the article is an appeal to history of society and state attitude to people with peculiarities in psychophysical development from the standpoint of civilized approach that will make possible to identify and summarize the prerequisites of becoming inclusive education as a socio-pedagogical phenomena.Results. On the basis of analysis of reference, historic and philosophical, psychological and pedagogical literature is reviewed the evolution of the views of society and the state for persons with specialties of psycho-physical development of a civilized approach as the unity of the progressive process of mankind development, in which distinguishes certain stages of cyclical development of society: the period of the establishment of society, the period of maturity of society, industrial, postindustrial and informational periods.Conclusion. Thus, periodization of the evolution of views of society for persons with features of psycho-physical development of a point of view of civilized approach the subject of research interest is not only one of some aspect of human existence, rather the combination of all forms of life activity of a certain society – material, moral, ideological, cultural, political, legal, religious, educational, developmental and so on.

Basic theories of the future development have been analyzed in the article, which include post-industrial and information society, postmodern society, risk society theory, theory of the network society and theory of the knowledge society. Based on the analysis of these theories the main features of future society have been systematized. Evaluation of success in the development of knowledge economy based on the knowledge index by countries and in Ukraine has been made. A comparison of the terms «post-industrial society» and «post-industrial economy» has been completed. The main features of post-industrial society, which distinguish it from the post-industrial economy, have been revealed. These features have been grouped on two levels: individual and public one. Public level features characterize the objective degree of development of economic and political institutions in society; individual level, as a subjective characteristic, describes the development of a person. ; У статті досліджено основні теорії майбутнього розвитку: постіндустріального та інформаційного суспільства, суспільства постмодерну, теорії суспільства ризику, теорії мережевого суспільства й теорії суспільства знання. Систематизовано основні ознаки майбутнього суспільства, виходячи з аналізу цих теорій. Проведено оцінку успіху розбудови економіки знань за країнами світу та в Україні.

Показано, що в інформаційному суспільстві спостерігається сутнісна трансформація поняття відповідальності. Проаналізована наукова позиція З. Баумана стосовно інформаційного суспільства як індивідуалізованого суспільства, у якому в результаті інформаційно-технологічної революції відбувається глибинна трансформація європейської культури, її цінностей і норм, у тому числі й відповідальності. Обґрунтовується, що на сучасному етапі формування культури інформаційного суспільства протиріччя в культурі породили системну кризу відповідальності. ; Показано, что в информационном обществе наблюдается сущностная трансформация понятия ответственности. Проанализирована научная позиция З. Баумана касательно информационного общества как индивидуализированного общества, в котором в результате информационно-технологической революции происходит глубинная трансформация европейской культуры, ее ценностей и норм, в том числе и ответственности. Обосновывается, что на современном этапе формирования культуры информационного общества противоречия в культуре породили системный кризис ответственности. ; It is shown in the article, that the modern stage of development of society is characterized deeply by contradictory tendencies in the field of politics, economy, culture that appears in the crisis of responsibility. All these processes require a serious scientific comprehension and analysis of the systems, sent to the exposure of specific features of this phenomenon for making of algorithm of actions, that will assist a removal or even softening of existent contradictions.Reasonably, that responsibility, being the multilevel and multidimensional phenomenon, was examined and examined in the different foreshortening: ethic, social, legal, philosophical, and also psychical. Thus, authors examine responsibility both with the aim of determination of essence of concept «responsibility» and making of going near her understanding and from position of different subject sides. At the same time, for today there is insufficiency of the works sanctified to complex consideration of responsibility in informative society. It is shown that modern life of man becomes the set of subjective and individual risks. That it did not take place around, even if a man is not reason of it, responsibility will carry she. In a presence asymmetric of two types of responsibility – collective and individual at that collective responsibility is minimized due to transference of responsibility of society on his individuals. Thus, two basic tendencies of contemporaneity are marked: increase of level of individualization and decline of role of the state in the decision of problems of modern society even within the limits of the competense that answers the crisis of collective responsibility. So the state stops to be the bulwark of justice and responsibility.It will be that for the modern stage characteristic «short-term» mentality, as a modern system of social relations is «superflexible», it is constantly transformed, changing acting persons, terms and rules of existence, often not reporting about it to the participants. In the field of work it is expressed in absence of long-term contracts, any guarantees and any responsibility, that, in turn, results in absence of planning and concrete prospects. In such terms mutual responsibility, loyalty and collectivism, hand over the positions and yield to each individual interest. Responsibility for itself, other, supporting, mutual aid, participation are basic descriptions of human mutual relations of society that is based on the traditional system of world views. In the modern world everybody answers for itself. Society of «postmodern» is society with the castrated ethics and moral. It would seem, norms remain the same, but it is declared nowise does not coincide with that a man looks after in reality. Yes, from all parties assert about values life, unacceptability of violence and war, about a necessity to protect a natural environment. But reality and statistical data testify to opposite: the world is on a verge an ecocatastrophe, violence and wars remain inalienable part of our life.Drawn conclusion, that on the modern stage of forming of culture of informative society of contradiction in a culture generated the system crisis of responsibility: ethic, political, economic, both on individual and collective levels.Opening of Z. Bauman of system crisis of principle of responsibility is illuminated in modern society on individual and collective levels, in all spheres of human relations: economic, political, social and spiritual. Bauman shows that takes place not simply change of one stage of development of society on other, that logically swims out from previous, but departure originates from linear traditional development. From society of order, responsibility, stability and immortality we passed to society of chaos, irresponsibility, equivalent probabilities and short-term, as a result planning, prognostication and responsible «conclusions on the future» is practically done by impossible.

Показано, що в інформаційному суспільстві спостерігається сутнісна трансформація поняття відповідальності. Проаналізована наукова позиція З. Баумана стосовно інформаційного суспільства як індивідуалізованого суспільства, у якому в результаті інформаційно-технологічної революції відбувається глибинна трансформація європейської культури, її цінностей і норм, у тому числі й відповідальності. Обґрунтовується, що на сучасному етапі формування культури інформаційного суспільства протиріччя в культурі породили системну кризу відповідальності. ; Показано, что в информационном обществе наблюдается сущностная трансформация понятия ответственности. Проанализирована научная позиция З. Баумана касательно информационного общества как индивидуализированного общества, в котором в результате информационно-технологической революции происходит глубинная трансформация европейской культуры, ее ценностей и норм, в том числе и ответственности. Обосновывается, что на современном этапе формирования культуры информационного общества противоречия в культуре породили системный кризис ответственности. ; It is shown in the article, that the modern stage of development of society is characterized deeply by contradictory tendencies in the field of politics, economy, culture that appears in the crisis of responsibility. All these processes require a serious scientific comprehension and analysis of the systems, sent to the exposure of specific features of this phenomenon for making of algorithm of actions, that will assist a removal or even softening of existent contradictions.Reasonably, that responsibility, being the multilevel and multidimensional phenomenon, was examined and examined in the different foreshortening: ethic, social, legal, philosophical, and also psychical. Thus, authors examine responsibility both with the aim of determination of essence of concept «responsibility» and making of going near her understanding and from position of different subject sides. At the same time, for today there is insufficiency of the works sanctified to complex consideration of responsibility in informative society. It is shown that modern life of man becomes the set of subjective and individual risks. That it did not take place around, even if a man is not reason of it, responsibility will carry she. In a presence asymmetric of two types of responsibility – collective and individual at that collective responsibility is minimized due to transference of responsibility of society on his individuals. Thus, two basic tendencies of contemporaneity are marked: increase of level of individualization and decline of role of the state in the decision of problems of modern society even within the limits of the competense that answers the crisis of collective responsibility. So the state stops to be the bulwark of justice and responsibility.It will be that for the modern stage characteristic «short-term» mentality, as a modern system of social relations is «superflexible», it is constantly transformed, changing acting persons, terms and rules of existence, often not reporting about it to the participants. In the field of work it is expressed in absence of long-term contracts, any guarantees and any responsibility, that, in turn, results in absence of planning and concrete prospects. In such terms mutual responsibility, loyalty and collectivism, hand over the positions and yield to each individual interest. Responsibility for itself, other, supporting, mutual aid, participation are basic descriptions of human mutual relations of society that is based on the traditional system of world views. In the modern world everybody answers for itself. Society of «postmodern» is society with the castrated ethics and moral. It would seem, norms remain the same, but it is declared nowise does not coincide with that a man looks after in reality. Yes, from all parties assert about values life, unacceptability of violence and war, about a necessity to protect a natural environment. But reality and statistical data testify to opposite: the world is on a verge an ecocatastrophe, violence and wars remain inalienable part of our life.Drawn conclusion, that on the modern stage of forming of culture of informative society of contradiction in a culture generated the system crisis of responsibility: ethic, political, economic, both on individual and collective levels.Opening of Z. Bauman of system crisis of principle of responsibility is illuminated in modern society on individual and collective levels, in all spheres of human relations: economic, political, social and spiritual. Bauman shows that takes place not simply change of one stage of development of society on other, that logically swims out from previous, but departure originates from linear traditional development. From society of order, responsibility, stability and immortality we passed to society of chaos, irresponsibility, equivalent probabilities and short-term, as a result planning, prognostication and responsible «conclusions on the future» is practically done by impossible.

The question manifestation of mass political behavior in modern individualized society through the formation of new social and political values and the growing role of individual choice individual nature of its activities in politics.Key words: mass political behavior, individualized society, class identification, the era ofmodern, post-industrial society. ; Досліджуються вияви масової політичної поведінки у сучасному індивідуалізованому суспільстві через формування системи нових соціально-політичних цінностей і постійно зростаючої ролі індивідуального вибору особистістю характеру своєї діяльності в політиці.Ключові слова: масова політична поведінка, індивідуалізоване суспільство, класова ідентифікація, епоха модерну, постіндустріальне суспільство.