Tri‐state cooperation
In: National municipal review, Band 46, Heft 8, S. 405-408
19333 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: National municipal review, Band 46, Heft 8, S. 405-408
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 163, Heft 1, S. 30-38
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: National municipal review, Band 32, Heft 8, S. 423-431
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 181, Heft 1, S. 142-148
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Foreign policy analysis, Band 7, Heft 3
ISSN: 1743-8594
What can states expect to receive in return for the military aid they provide to other states? Can military aid buy recipient state compliance with donor objectives? In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of US military assistance on recipient state behavior toward the United States. We build on existing literature by creating three explicit theoretical models, employing a new measure of cooperation generated from events data, and controlling for preference similarity, so that our results capture the influence military aid has on recipient state behavior independent of any dyadic predisposition toward cooperation or conflict. We test seven hypotheses using a combination of simultaneous equation, cross-sectional time series, and Heckman selection models. We find that, with limited exceptions, increasing levels of US military aid significantly reduce cooperative foreign policy behavior with the United States. US reaction to recipient state behavior is also counterintuitive; instead of using a carrot-and-stick approach to military aid allocations, our results show that recipient state cooperation is likely to lead to subsequent reductions in US military assistance. Adapted from the source document.
In: Asian perspective, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 205-214
ISSN: 2288-2871
In: Foreign Policy Analysis, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 275-294
In: National municipal review, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 151-156
AbstractProvisin for grants‐in‐aid in the social field, to be spent by states under federal supevision, will pave the way for greater coöperation between states and nation.
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 75, Heft 4, S. 160
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 74, Heft 4, S. 155
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: American political science review, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 721-737
ISSN: 1537-5943
Our history affords numerous examples of efforts to secure state cooperation in the enforcement of federal laws, especially those marking abrupt changes in national policy. In practice, state cooperation has been most readily forthcoming in the administration of benefactory legislation. Most notably, federal grants-in-aid have been effective in helping to lift the standards of state services in such functional areas as highways, airports, public health, and agricultural technology. In another area, Selective Service has successfully employed local boards to enforce national policy. On the other hand, the Fugitive Slave law, the Civil Rights laws, National Prohibition, and the Emergency Price Control acts are reminders of the difficulties federal authorities have encountered in trying to enlist state aid in enforcement of national regulatory policies uncongenial to local sentiment. This article examines the experience under a permissive provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, section 11(b), which authorizes the national government to reimburse state agencies aiding in enforcement.
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 162-188
ISSN: 1085-794X
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 206-212
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: Journal of civil society, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 325-340
ISSN: 1744-8697