Christians often disagree with themselves and others over such matters as music, popular culture and worship style. Yet they usually lack theology of art or taste to deal with aesthetic disputes. This provocative book offers an "ecumenical" approach to artistic taste and aesthetic judgement
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Taste usually occupies the bottom of the sensorial hierarchy, as the quintessentially hedonistic sense, too close to the animal, the elemental and the corporeal, and for this reason disciplined and moralised. At the same time, taste is indissolubly tied to knowledge. To taste is to discriminate, emit judgement, enter an unstable domain of synaesthetic normativity where the certainty of metaphysical categories begins to crumble. This second title in the 'Law and the Senses' series explores law using taste as a conceptual and ontological category able to unsettle legal certainties, and a promising tool whereby to investigate the materiality of law's relation to the world. For what else is law's reduction of the world into legal categories, if not law's ingesting the world by tasting it, and emitting moral and legal judgements accordingly? Through various topics including coffee, wine, craft cider and Japanese knotweed, this volume explores the normativities that shape the way taste is felt and categorised, within and beyond subjective, phenomenological and human dimensions. The result is an original interdisciplinary volume – complete with seven speculative 'recipes' – dedicated to a rarely explored intersection, with contributions from artists, legal academics, philosophers, anthropologists and sociologists.
In: Journal of sport and social issues: the official journal of Northeastern University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 438-444
'Taste and Democracy' is the title of a glazed ceramic pot made by Grayson Perry in 2004. When Perry delivered the first of four Reith Lectures for the BBC in 2013 with the title 'Democracy Has Bad Taste', arts practitioners were given a new kind of platform in debates on taste. In this Professorial Platform, I will ask what position the art school occupies in debates on taste and democracy in the twenty-first century and how it can affirm its position when caught between the cultural ideal of the critically astute tastemaker and the contemporary spectre of the algorithm. I will argue that the true democratic problem of taste lies in the claim on a socially responsible act of self-representation within the domain of free choice, which sacrifices individual gratification in the name of better judgement. The historical basis of this claim is worth examining in order to understand the role of the art school at a moment when the commercial idyll of middle-class taste is coming apart at the seams.
Selective bias is the tendency to interpret information in ways that are consistent with our preconceived notions. If, for example, consumers have different opinions about branded and non-branded versions of certain products, it can also be caused by the fact that they perceive the product differently due to their beliefs about the brand in any way (e.g. previous experience, brand name). With the involvement of several food industry products, I tested the relationship between the brand and perceived taste on two independent groups. During a blind test, I researched whether the favored branded product is really more tastier, and I used the brand test to check the effect of brand awareness on taste.
UIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020 DL 57/2016/CP1453/CT0090 ; Kant's account of taste is often taken to imply that aesthetic appreciation and moral issues are incompatible – as if one could not consider purposes of a moral sort while passing a judgment of taste. Taking into account how morally and politically engaged art has proven to be, it is easy to see why interest in Kant's account of taste has waned. This cannot be the whole story, though. I claim that the applied judgment of taste can include the consideration of moral purposes while remaining an aesthetic judgment: Iargue, first, that the beauty of buildings and the beauty of horses may include the consideration of concepts of a moral sort and that human beauty does necessarily include it; in the second part of my paper, I will give an account of why the applied judgment of taste is a genuine kind of judgment of taste. If my views are correct, the applied judgment of taste instantiates aesthetic appreciation of morally and politically engaged art objects without dismissing – and on the contrary, considering – their moral and political engagement. As such, Kant's notion of applied judgment of taste might enrich current discussions in the fields of aesthetics, philosophy of art, and art itself. ; publishersversion ; published