Suchergebnisse

After characterizing Taylor's general approach to the problems of solidarity, we distinguish and reconstruct three contexts of solidarity in which this approach is developed: the civic, the socio-economic, and the moral. We argue that Taylor's distinctive move in each of these contexts of solidarity is to claim that the relationship at stake poses normatively justified demands, which are motivationally demanding, but insufficiently motivating on their own. On Taylor's conception, we need some understanding of extra motivational sources which explain why people do (or would) live up to the exacting demands. Taylor accepts that our self-understanding as members of either particular communities or humanity at large has some motivational power, but he suspects that in many cases the memberships are too thin to resonate deeply and enduringly within us. In Taylor's view, a realistic picture of what moves people to solidarity has to account for the extra motivation, when it happens. We propose an alternative view in which morality, democracy and socio-economic cooperation can be seen as separate spheres or relations which are normatively justified, motivationally demanding, but also sufficiently motivating on their own.

After characterizing Taylor's general approach to the problems of solidarity, we distinguish and reconstruct three contexts of solidarity in which this approach is developed: the civic, the socio-economic, and the moral. We argue that Taylor's distinctive move in each of these contexts of solidarity is to claim that the relationship at stake poses normatively justified demands, which are motivationally demanding, but insufficiently motivating on their own. On Taylor's conception, we need some understanding of extra motivational sources which explain why people do (or would) live up to the exacting demands. Taylor accepts that our self-understanding as members of either particular communities or humanity at large has some motivational power, but he suspects that in many cases the memberships are too thin to resonate deeply and enduringly within us. In Taylor's view, a realistic picture of what moves people to solidarity has to account for the extra motivation, when it happens. We propose an alternative view in which morality, democracy and socio-economic cooperation can be seen as separate spheres or relations which are normatively justified, motivationally demanding, but also sufficiently motivating on their own. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications and Thesis Eleven Co-op Ltd, copyright holder.]

Charles Taylor gehört zu den international renommiertesten Philosophen der Gegenwart. Sein Werk vereinigt auf der Grundlage einer philosophischen Anthropologie starker Wertungen Sprach-, Sozial- und politische Philosophie zu einer umfassenden Gütertheorie der Moderne, die in Taylors Opus Magnum A Secular Age (2007; dt.: Ein säkulares Zeitalter, 2009) ihren brillanten Abschluss findet. Obwohl noch jung an Jahren, gehört dieses Buch bereits jetzt schon zu den Klassikern der philosophischen Ideengeschichte: In komplexen Gedankenführungen erzählt Taylor dabei von dem Einstellungswandel im Sozialprestige unserer "Fülle"-Vorstellungen, um die Entstehung des säkularen Denkens zu erkunden. Dabei spannt er den erzählerischen Bogen von den Reformbewegungen des Hochmittelalters über die vertragstheoretischen Disziplinierungsmodelle bis hin zum ausgrenzenden Humanismus des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Dieses Werk wird nun von international ausgewiesenen Fachvertretern durchgängig kommentiert, um auf diese Weise Interpretationshilfen für ein Schlüsselwerk der Sozialphilosophie anzubieten.