Suchergebnisse

International audience ; System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

International audience ; System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

International audience ; System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

International audience ; System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

International audience System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

International audience ; System innovation for sustainability requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To support these complex and long-term transitions, decision support tools are required but nowadays, assessment tools are disciplinary and consider mainly material flows with environmental or economical perspectives. These tools provide helpful quantitative information for system (re)-design but often miss the temporal or spatial dimensions of a project and do not sufficiently consider the value creation system they propose to evaluate. This communication presents a conceptual framework for territorial project analysis. It enables the spatio-temporal analysis of stakeholder networks during a project. This framework considers tangible and intangible resources flows between the project's stakeholders and their territory to examine how an initiative can emerge , mobilise territorial assets and create sustainable values in return. This process takes place at the meso level (territory) and create dynamic interactions with the micro-level (organisations and individuals) and the macro-level (regulations and institutions). This analytical framework aims at supporting decision thanks to a comprehensive vision of the value constellation implied in a territorial project. It was developed on a theoretical basis and partially tested on various projects (territorial bioraffinery, PSS, territorial repair network) that were presented in previous communications. Future work will integrate sustainability principles to this framework to assist both economic, political and civic actors in taking decisions whom contribute to system transition to sustainability during their territorial projects.

Geographic analyses have centered on how state and capitalist enterprises—often in collaboration with each other—deploy volumetric territorial strategies and processes to achieve their ends, i.e., control in the form of securitization or resource extraction. We invite an exploration of different ways voluminous environments, their flows, and ecosystems can be experienced and represented with analyses of diverse activities of cave explorers in Venezuela, Cuba, and Mexico. These activities call attention to the heterogeneity of volumetric territorial projects. By exploring and mapping subterranean spaces, cavers co-opt some of the techniques of the state and/or capitalist territorialization and commodification. But the experiences of underground exploration and even mapping exceed and sometimes contradict the motivations and effects rightfully associated with these volumetric practices. Not only are these activities deeply affective and embodied, they typically happen beyond state reach. Moreover, following cavers' explorations requires more open conceptions of both territory and voluminous spaces, and the ecological rhythms and flows that constitute them. Doing so leads to the recognition of how cavers experience and enact alternative volumetric territorial projects. In the process, some of these projects forge defiant national imaginaries, literally from below. The possibility and potential of these imaginaries come from the unique quality of subterranean exploration: only those who explore and survey passages underground know their location, extent, and at times, their content. Yet, there are dangers as well: not only are most of these projects far from emancipatory or inclusionary, they can be co-opted by state and/or capitalist enterprises. The implications of this last point are complex and potentially contradictory: while state knowledge and control of caves and karst environments may limit caver access and activities, lack of state knowledge and control may also result in these environments and their contents' lack of protection.

En el presente artículo se propone un panorama de la primera generación de Municipios en Uruguay teniendo en cuenta la oportunidad que representa la escala municipal/local para impulsar procesos de desarrollo.Se describe el sistema de gobierno municipal implantado en 2010, observando sus variadas escalas y tipos de territorios y comunidades. En otros ámbitos, la existencia de las entidades municipales es de antigua data. No en Uruguay, que ha generado una institucionalidad ex novo en ese nivel de gobierno. Es recién en 2010 cuando el Uruguay comienza a implementar su tercer nivel de gobierno. Si bien el país transita hace décadas por reformas vinculadas a la organización territorial del Estado su denominador el binomio debilidad-dependencia.En el texto se discuten los conceptos de desarrollo y de proyecto de territorio, analizando la relación de los municipios con sus territorios y los instrumentos previstos en la Ley de Ordenamiento Territorial. ; In this paper an overview of the fi rst generation of Municipalities in Uruguay given the opportunity represented by the municipal/ local level to promote evelopment processes is proposed. Local government system introduced in 2010is described, noting its various scales and types of territories and communities. In other areas, the existence of municipalities is longstanding. Not in Uruguay, which has generated an ex novo institutions at that level of government. It is only in 2010when the Uruguay begins to implement its third level of government. Meanwhile the country transits decades by reforms, linked to the territorial organization of the binomial denominator weak-dependence. In the text he concepts of development and territorial project are discussed by analyzing the relationship between their territories and municipalities with the tools provided in the Law of Land Management.

The centrality was defined often in theory by mathematical constructions integrating a strong part of economy, even basing completely above. Actually, it is considered as a point of dynamic balance. The acentrality is a principle meaning superiority of the political construction of the centrality, and on the second role of the economy. ; La centralité a souvent été définie théoriquement par des constructions mathématiques intégrant une forte part d'économie, voire reposant complètement dessus. De fait, elle est considérée comme un point d'équilibre dynamique. L'acentralité est un principe débouchant surla primauté de la construction politique de la centralité, et sur le rôle second de l'économie.

The centrality was defined often in theory by mathematical constructions integrating a strong part of economy, even basing completely above. Actually, it is considered as a point of dynamic balance. The acentrality is a principle meaning superiority of the political construction of the centrality, and on the second role of the economy. ; La centralité a souvent été définie théoriquement par des constructions mathématiques intégrant une forte part d'économie, voire reposant complètement dessus. De fait, elle est considérée comme un point d'équilibre dynamique. L'acentralité est un principe débouchant surla primauté de la construction politique de la centralité, et sur le rôle second de l'économie.

The centrality was defined often in theory by mathematical constructions integrating a strong part of economy, even basing completely above. Actually, it is considered as a point of dynamic balance. The acentrality is a principle meaning superiority of the political construction of the centrality, and on the second role of the economy. ; La centralité a souvent été définie théoriquement par des constructions mathématiques intégrant une forte part d'économie, voire reposant complètement dessus. De fait, elle est considérée comme un point d'équilibre dynamique. L'acentralité est un principe débouchant surla primauté de la construction politique de la centralité, et sur le rôle second de l'économie.

The centrality was defined often in theory by mathematical constructions integrating a strong part of economy, even basing completely above. Actually, it is considered as a point of dynamic balance. The acentrality is a principle meaning superiority of the political construction of the centrality, and on the second role of the economy. ; La centralité a souvent été définie théoriquement par des constructions mathématiques intégrant une forte part d'économie, voire reposant complètement dessus. De fait, elle est considérée comme un point d'équilibre dynamique. L'acentralité est un principe débouchant surla primauté de la construction politique de la centralité, et sur le rôle second de l'économie.

The centrality was defined often in theory by mathematical constructions integrating a strong part of economy, even basing completely above. Actually, it is considered as a point of dynamic balance. The acentrality is a principle meaning superiority of the political construction of the centrality, and on the second role of the economy. ; La centralité a souvent été définie théoriquement par des constructions mathématiques intégrant une forte part d'économie, voire reposant complètement dessus. De fait, elle est considérée comme un point d'équilibre dynamique. L'acentralité est un principe débouchant surla primauté de la construction politique de la centralité, et sur le rôle second de l'économie.

En el presente artículo se propone un panorama de la primera generación de Municipios en Uruguay teniendo en cuenta la oportunidad que representa la escala municipal/local para impulsar procesos de desarrollo. Se describe el sistema de gobierno municipal implantado en 2010, observando sus variadas escalas y tipos de territorios y comunidades. En otros ámbitos, la existencia de las entidades municipales es de antigua data. No en Uruguay, que ha generado una institucionalidad ex novo en ese nivel de gobierno. Es recién en 2010 cuando el Uruguay comienza a implementar su tercer nivel de gobierno. Si bien el país transita hace décadas por reformas vinculadas a la organización territorial del Estado su denominador el binomio debilidad-dependencia. En el texto se discuten los conceptos de desarrollo y de proyecto de territorio, analizando la relación de los municipios con sus territorios y los instrumentos previstos en la Ley de Ordenamiento Territorial. ; In this paper an overview of the first generation of Municipalities in Uruguay given the opportunity represented by the municipal/ local level to promote evelopment processes is proposed. Local government system introduced in 2010is described, noting its various scales and types of territories and communities. In other areas, the existence of municipalities is longstanding. Not in Uruguay, which has generated an ex novo institutions at that level of government. It is only in 2010 when the Uruguay begins to implement its third level of government. Meanwhile the country transits decades by reforms, linked to the territorial organization of the binomial denominator weak-dependence. In the text he concepts of development and territorial project are discussed by analyzing the relationship between their territories and municipalities with the tools provided in the Law of Land Management. ; Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo