Suchergebnisse

The practice of estrangement retains an essential political function. It is possible to link this narrative formula to the investigative paths typical of Thing Theory: in this way the perspective guaranteed by the matter can shed light upon the ideological coordinates of capitalist logic, through an interpretation of the commodity in a dissident key according to the suggestion offered by Francesco Orlando in his Freudian theory. This article therefore aims to document the relationship between Šklovskij's intuition, Thing Theory and Orlando's proposal through a close reading of Solid Object, a short story by Virginia Woolf. ; La pratica dello straniamento conserva un'imprescindibile funzione politica. È possibile legare tale formula narrativa ai percorsi indagativi propri della Thing Theory: in tal modo la prospettiva garantita dalla materia può far luce sulle coordinate ideologiche proprie della logica capitalistica, attraverso una rilettura della merce in chiave dissidente secondo il suggerimento offerto da Francesco Orlando in merito alla sua teoria freudiana. Questo contributo mira perciò a documentare il connubio tra l'intuizione di Šklovskij, la Thing Theory e la proposta di Orlando attraverso una lettura ravvicinata di "Solid Object", racconto di Virginia Woolf.

Selon la Legal Origins Theory, les origines juridiques d'un État ont une influence significative sur sa croissance économique. Née dans l'orbite du droit des sociétés, elle a d'abord été défendue par un collectif d'auteurs à l'occasion de l'étude du niveau de protection accordé aux actionnaires minoritaires dans différents États à travers le monde. Ils en ont tiré la conclusion que les États appartenant à la culture juridique de Common Law accordaient le plus haut degré de protection, source d'un marché financier efficace et synonyme de croissance économique. La Legal Origins Theory s'est ensuite étendue à d'autres domaines juridiques et s'est attachée à démontrer plus globalement l'efficience générale du modèle de Common Law. Dans la foulée, elle fut au cœur des rapports Doing Business de la Banque mondiale. Cette théorie a suscité de nombreuses critiques que la présente contribution a pour ambition d'exposer. Après l'analyse de la théorie et des critiques émises à son encontre, l'étude tente de dégager les présupposés philosophiques sous-jacents à la Legal Origins Theory, à travers la pensée de deux auteurs : Friedrich von Hayek et Bruno Leoni. ; The Legal Origins Theory argues that the legal origins of a state have a significant influence on its economic growth. This theory originated mainly and prospered in the field of company law. A group of researchers has enquired about the degree of protection granted to minority shareholders in various states throughout the world. They concluded that states belonging to the legal family of common law granted the best protection, sourcing an efficient market and easing their economic growth. The Legal Origins Theory spread out widely and expanded to several other legal domains, while continuing to emphasize and highlight the efficiency of the common law. It was furthermore at the heart of the "Doing Business" reports of the World Bank. This theory has led to many critiques, which the present paper aims to show. Beyond this analysis and the review of criticisms, our study finally attempts to identify the philosophical assumptions that support the Theory of Legal Origins, through the review of the developments authored by Friedrich von Hayek and Bruno Leoni. ; Peer reviewed

This text is constructed as follows. It is organised as follows: classifications; a reminder of the foundations of the stakeholder theory; stakeholder theory, empirical or normative theory? ambiguities in stakeholder theory; the ethical and political foundations of stakeholder theory; stakeholders as a possible basis for deliberative democracy). ; Ce texte est construit de la manière suivante. Il est organisé de la manière suivante : les classifications ; le rappel des fondements de la théorie des parties prenantes ; la théorie des parties prenantes, une théorie empirique ou normative ?; les ambiguïtés de la théorie des parties prenantes ; les fondements éthiques et politiques de la théorie des parties prenantes ; les parties prenantes comme fondement possible d'une démocratie délibérative). ; This text is constructed as follows. It is organised as follows: classifications; a reminder of the foundations of the stakeholder theory; stakeholder theory, empirical or normative theory? ambiguities in stakeholder theory; the ethical and political foundations of stakeholder theory; stakeholders as a possible basis for deliberative democracy). ; Doctoral

How to theorize communication in social sciences? This text has two goals. First, to rely on the work of Louis Quéré, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of the two dominant models of two dominant models: an epistemological model enrolling the theory of information and cybernetics in an instrumental aim; a political model that aims at inter-understanding at the service of self-determination of the citizens in the elaboration of norms that govern them. Moreover, we wish to add to this review, two models which go beyond the limits of the first two approaches: a praxeological model that relies on praxis as an organizing activity of shared perspectives; a model of incommunication that reverses the situation and makes the impossibility of achieving intercomprehension the norm.