Suchergebnisse

Abstract. The article determines the structure of political conflicts, technology, and practice management, explains the concept of subject and object of a political conflict. The article provides information about functions of the political conflict, inc ; Анотація. У статті окреслюються структура політичних конфліктів, технології і практика управління ними, пояснюється поняття суб'єкта і об'єкта політичного конфлікту, перераховані функції політичного конфлікту, а також наведено інформацію про розробників т ; Анотація. У статті окреслюються структура політичних конфліктів, технології і практика управління ними, пояснюється поняття суб'єкта і об'єкта політичного конфлікту, перераховані функції політичного конфлікту, а також наведено інформацію про розробників т

The attitude of Louis Althusser towards Mao Zedong and Maoism is determined by the philosopher's intolerance to the "humanistic" revisionism of the fundamental principles of Marxism. Althusser characterizes Mao Zedong as a great Chinese communist leader, whose theoretical and political practice was in strict accordance with Marxism-Leninism. The philosopher draws conclusions about the continuity of Maoism in Leninist theoretical and political practice, as well as the possibility of the existence of a Marxist-Leninist alternative to Soviet socialist development.

The paper looks same results of last years inter-branch science investigations and follow inevitable inclusion the results in context of economic theory. New parts of inter-branch sciences (behavioral, evolutional, institutional and other economics) doubts of evidence of traditional economic theory main postulates, and offer alternative conceptions for explanation economic phenomena. This is a challenge to economists who maintains of stable fundamentals.

The paper considers some issues connected with developing the innovation theory in Russia and abroad drawing on Russian scientific literature and textbooks. It is revealed that while understanding the need for an innovative way for the development of national economy, Russia lacks a harmonious and conventional innovation theory. The paper presents a critique of theoretical positions of a number of Russian authors concerning classification and essence of innovation, the corresponding terminological paradigm alongside the main mechanisms of innovations diffusion. We provide a comparison and corresponding generalization of our approach to diffusion mechanisms with those of foreign scientists. We note that the insufficient preparedness of many researchers in contextual understanding of both foreign terms and some notions of political economy poses significant obstacles to the development of innovation theory in Russia. We finally offer some recommendations to improve the innovation theory in Russia.

The review presents a discussion at the session of the Scientific Council of Moscow State University on the development of modern economic theory and Russian model of social and economic development. The session, held on November 28, 2019 at the Faculty of Economics in Lomonosov Moscow State University, was dedicated to two dates - the 215th anniversary of the Department of Political Economy and the 115th anniversary of N. A. Tsagolov. The topic of scientific discussion: "Interdisciplinary approach - the key to solving theoretical and practical problems of modern time". During the discussion, issues related to interdisciplinary method in economic theory, University traditions and modern experience of interdisciplinary method in economic science were discussed. Speakers also concentrated on the problems of national political economy development, inseparably connected with the history of the Department of Political Economy at the Faculty of Economics in Moscow University. Special attention was paid to the period of the development of the Department under the leadership of N. A. Tsagolov and formation of the scientific school connected with his name. The discussion focused on the interdisciplinary approach developed by "Tsagolov School", the possibility of its development under the conditions of a new scientific and technological revolution, and its role in the effective study of economy and society in the twenty-first century.

The article analyzes the theoretical foundations of the concept of sustainable mobility within the framework of its three key components. It shows that the problem of transport sustainability is holistic and interdisciplinary and is considered within environmental, urbanistic and transport approaches that complement each other and offer conceptually close solutions for modern urban development. The article discusses the main directions of sustainable mobility, laid down in strategic planning documents of foreign countries. The paper also provides examples of the implementation of the principles of sustainable mobility in the strategies of socio-economic development of Russia's cities and regions developed by the authors. Population surveys conducted by the authors in Russian cities as part of the development of these strategic planning documents show that about 95% of the population prefer sustainable transport policy tools that have proven themselves useful in many cities around the world. The analysis concludes with the recommendations for Russia's transition to the «sustainable transport» paradigm.

The paper examines leadership as a key component of contemporary management. It reviews the changes in leadership paradigm at the beginning of the third millennium. To determine the correspondence between the recent theory and practice of leadership the article provides a comparative analysis of the existing views among scholars and business experts, and summarizes the best business practices of national and foreign companies. Although there is a certain correlation in theoretical and practical viewpoints describing the key leadership features in the 21st century, and successful business cases demonstrating the new ethical principles of leadership, still it is too early to come to the conclusion about total correspondence between theory and common business practice. To date the new leadership paradigm is at its infancy stage. Unless novel ideas and principles become a part of public consciousness, situations that contradict the recent leadership theory and its best practices are bound to emerge. There are several circumstances limiting the development of ethical and responsible leadership approach.

This paper is a review of a new textbook "Economic Development. Theory and Practice" (2016) written by M.V. Kulakov and L.P. Chikhun.

An article about the use of the methodology of general systems theory and the theory of self-organization as a methodological basis of scientific interpretation of social reality. The author analyzes the role of ideology and propaganda in the different concepts of interpretation of social reality (social Darwinism, Marxism, etc.). The main conclusion of the paper is the need deideologization scientific knowledge.

The article presents the analysis of methodological issues and problems of the correlation between theory and reality in basic courses taught at the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University. The paper provides the methodological approaches that can be used in conducting lectures and seminars, based on many years of experience; analyzes basic methods and forms that help convince students of the practical usefulness of the disciplines studied. The authors also offer methodological solutions that allow to explain to the students the ultimate goal of studying theoretical courses and encourage their involvement and interest in the learning process.

Article about synthesis of theory the self-organizing and the institutional economic theory. The author proves the thesis about exogenous an origin of institutional processes in economy and cyclic institutional development.