Multilateral Governance of Nuclear Risks
In: Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 142-154
ISSN: 1944-4079
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 142-154
ISSN: 1944-4079
In: Journal of risk research: the official journal of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe and the Society for Risk Analysis Japan, Band 25, Heft 8, S. 941-944
ISSN: 1466-4461
In: Security studies, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 142-179
ISSN: 1556-1852
In: Security studies, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 142-179
ISSN: 0963-6412
World Affairs Online
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 319-321
ISSN: 1470-482X
In: Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft: IPG = International politics and society, Heft 4, S. 44-62
ISSN: 0945-2419
World Affairs Online
In: Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft: IPG = International politics and society, Heft 4, S. 44-62
In: Third world quarterly, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 557-579
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Oxford review of economic policy, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 195-210
ISSN: 1460-2121
In: Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs
ISSN: 1868-4882
In: Contemporary security policy, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 72-109
ISSN: 1743-8764
In: Development and change, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 164-190
ISSN: 1467-7660
ABSTRACTMultilateral development banks (MDBs) are one of the most popular forms of international organization, with at least 27 operating in the world today. Although most academics and policy makers focus on the World Bank and major regional MDBs, the majority of MDBs are in fact relatively small, and controlled by developing as opposed to industrialized countries. How do the differing governance arrangements of these 'minilateral' development banks (MnDBs) impact their operations? This article takes the Trade and Development Bank (TDB), an MDB in Africa with 22 regional member countries, as a case study to consider this question. Based on an analysis of TDB's track record since 2005 and interviews with management and shareholders, the author finds that borrower‐led governance leads to substantial disadvantages in terms of access to finance. Borrower‐led governance permits TDB and other MnDBs greater operational flexibility, which partially compensates for this financial disadvantage, but these operational strategies come with trade‐offs in terms of developmental effectiveness. The findings suggest that MnDBs have substantial latent potential and, in an increasingly multipolar world, they are likely to grow in coming years. However, MnDBs need to ensure that their developmental value added is strengthened in step with their financial power.
In: Journal of risk research: the official journal of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe and the Society for Risk Analysis Japan, Band 25, Heft 8, S. 959-975
ISSN: 1466-4461
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 319-321
ISSN: 1470-4838
In: Études internationales, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 593
ISSN: 1703-7891